Response to Pio

Comment on John F. Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy Theories by Dereck.

First, have you ever thrown an object in a car while you were moving. It come right back to your hand because your hand is moving at the same speed as the car in which you are driving. But in a convertible, once you get above the top of the car, that which is propelled upward will end up behind the car because the car will continue to move but which is above the top of the car will slow down in comparison to the vehicle. Your explanation still doesn’t explain what you can clearly see in photos and the Zapruter film. Brain matter and blood is propelled in a forward stream in front of the President. That which stay below the top of the car covered the Connally’s. The part that got above the car would then fall on the back of the car or even beyond the back of the car since the car continued to move. I guess we just need to agree to disagree. It doesn’t seem fair that everyone’s evidence that Kennedy was shot from in front was because of the “back and to the left movement” of his head. But then you can see from slow mo of film that his head actually went forward first, and that blood and brain matter was shot forward in front of the President (the exit wound) thus establishing a shot from behind, but someone this evidence is flawed. Then there is this crap about the positions of Kennedy to Gov. Connally in the car. If you argue that Connally was sitting inboard the President and lower thus making them line up appropriately to be shot from the Depository then the “Magic Bullet Theory” is brought up. I suppose you could argue what the bullet looked like, but you can’t argue that this alignment wouldn’t have made it possible. Computer recreations have shown that it is plausible. But I have read too many accounts that say Connnally was sitting in front of Pres. Kennedy. But this then weakens the argument that Connally was struck by a different bullet. How would it be possible for Connally to have even gotten hit if the President was sitting directly behind him? There wouldn’t have been a clear path to Connally without going through the President. Rather than trying to debunk things that do not need debunk, try to offer a alternate theory to account for all the injuries. But be specific. Explain how it is possible for Connally to get hit from behind and the bullet(s) not hit the President. Don’t come up with adecdotal evidence about wind and such. Explain how blood and brain matter be propelled forward, it the President was struck from in front and the exit wound was in the back. Plus, conspiracy theorist say the Warren Commission did a horrible job investigating it, yet much of your timeline comes from what was reported by the Warren Commission, including your script of some of the police interviews. Once again, conspiracy theorists will just pick and chose which things to accept and which to say were fabricated. Now, personally, I do think there was a conspiracy, but I feel that Oswald was still the shooter and only shooter.