The 35th President of the United States of America John F. Kennedy was assassinated on Friday, November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas, USA at 12:30 […]
Continue Reading John F. Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy Theories
The 35th President of the United States of America John F. Kennedy was assassinated on Friday, November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas, USA at 12:30 […]
Continue Reading John F. Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy Theories
Lee Harvey Oswald shot John F. Kennedy and he acted alone in the shooting. I think someone put him up to it. By that , I mean someone put him in that window.
I think it was Carlos Marcello ( new orleans mob boss) had some involvement , as well as some Cubans , possibly guys in the CIA ( remember , the CIA and the Mafia was working together to kill Castro at the time).
Lee Harvey Oswald worked in New Orleans during the summer of ’62. He knew David Ferrie and Guy Banister (men who knew Marcello ).
Marcello knew Jack Ruby ( the man who killed Oswald). Marcello helped Ruby in the nightclub business and came him lots of sausage for christmas. Ruby knew lots of guys in the mafia. He went to cuba around ’61 or ’62 to deliver guns. Telephone records show he made long distance phone call to Santo Trafficante and others during early November 1963.
And after Ruby was arrested for killing Oswald , Joe Campisi , a resurant ownner connected to Marcello and others visited Ruby in jail.
View Comment
Oswald could not have killed kennedy because 2 witnesses saw him on the six floor of the texas book depsoitry and if he had take the shot from there the bullet would of had to have truned a corner practically. police have been over the evidance in the case of the kennedy murder and found that the evidence against oswald was inconclusive he was probs payed to just sit there and take the fall for a lot of money or threated he may not have even known what he was taking the fall for all i know is that thanx to shotty poilce work Oswald was wrongly inprisoned and now he is dead but we will probs never know the truth because the only two men when could have told us the truth are dead
Okay, Okay…all I’m seeing to all these ‘opinions’ are the mafia, Oswald, or…bigfoot & bruce lee??? What you have to realize is that there are more than just 3 or 4 groups of people involved. In our history class we learned that almost 17 different groups or persons could have been involved. There is no way to know for sure, and there isn’t enough evidence to have a solid oppinion.
I don’t, however, believe Oswald acted alone. I think there is enough evidence to disregard that theory, but not all the evidence will be released until like 2020 or 30 something. By that point in time anyone involved in the assassination will already be dead.
Hahah big foot ok mate ok
There are so many questions with this theroy
Was L.H.O an alone shooter?
Was L.H.O apart of the mafia?
Was jack ruby sent to kill L.H.O by the mafia so that his cover wasn’t blown?
cause it was a bit suss that L.H.O was killed momments before his trial
i think this is all weird and by the time we figure it out who really cares i mean besides the great grandchildren it wont really affect us.
Its good to know what your country is really hiding, so that you, your children or grandchildren do not have a country that is dictated by fear or actual militia. If anyone knows anything about History, then every great nation falls to greed and secrecy. Assassinations like JFK show just how powerful a corporation is to be able to cover up murders and missing people. At the moment no one is more powerful or above these people. When the Iron Curtain was separating East and West Germany, people in the East could not say a single joke or satire against the government and risk going home to an empty house. The Teachers would have ratted the satire joke to Government police, who would see this as a risk or reliability to government control, and have these people simply vanish.
Something to think about when someone is assassinated, or just vanishes. Who is in control and what can prevent tyranny?
View Comment
I believe that there is waaaaaaay too many conspiracy theories and government coverups to actually figure out for sure who killed JFK and why. however i do think it was very strange that the men guarding the presidents car were ordered to stand down. I have suspected that the CIA was involved somehow with the shooting but there is no way to prove this theory unfortunately, and i dont think there ever will be. the CIA is one of the most powerful secret organisations in the world, if not the most powerful. and i dont think thats going to change for a long time.
Did you know that his car or motorcade wasn’t supposed to go down that road, that the government changed the route.
Moron
I’m from Dallas. You have to make that turn onto Elm to get onto the Stemmon’s to get to the Trade Mart. There’s no other way. Nobody changed the route and it wasn’t a conspiracy.
Hate to flash it to you people, but LHO was the only assasin and he acted alone. Everybody can twist in the wind with their little theories and cherry-pick evidence to suit their particular idea. The Warren Report was a cover-up, fraud, or incompetent. It laid out the logical facts, forensic evidence, and drew intelligent conclusions.
All you “truthers” are the biggest group of clowns. You have to impart weight to the event by making JFK’s death stand for more than it was. A sociopath missed the head 2 out of 3 times, scored on the last and killed the man. IT’s THAT SIMPLE!
View Comment
Anyone see the Zapruder film? The back of JFK’s head explodes as he is knocked backwards by the final shot. So he was shot from the front, don’t have to be a forensic specialist to realize that. Furthermore, three shots and two head shots from over 200 yards back, 61 feet up, out of a window, in less than 2 seconds? Really? Accounting for recoil, he would have had to realign his shots from that distance, not enough time for all that. The Warren Report states that one bullet was used, that was later discounted as incorrect (1968 I believe).
You have to be the one person in America still dense enough to blame it all on ole’ Oswald. Why do you think in all the videos of Oswald after arrest and before his death show hm with inceasingly more bruises, the 5-0 in your beloved Dallas beat the hell out of him for two days and he still wouldn’t confess, (or wouldn’t confess to what they wanted him to) so he was killed.
View Comment
I think that there are too many theories to figure out who actually killed Kennedy and why. Lucky for us, our sh^&*y government is going to be giving us the “sugar-coated” version of the assasination in 2020. Until then, I think everybody worrying about it, will just keep getting into spats with other people worrying about it. Honesly, I think rather than getting into an online fight about it, maybe it’s time somebody actually DID something to figure out everything that we have the right to know. I understand that the government thinks it’s okay to hide things from the people in order to protect them. We, as americans, gave them that role when we elected them into offic, and we, as americans also should be able to dictate what we should know. It’s a government ruled by the people, for the people? Correct? Yes.
Anyways, point being, odds are against us ever finding out what actually happend to a well loved president unless somebody has the guys to rally up some people, and go force the government to let us know what actually happened.
But, the governemt IS the government, it’s not just a willy nilly thing goign against them and trying to get them to change their ways because we know they lie and hide things from us.
Any who, A lot of these conspiricies make sense, but only one can be right.
And none of us were the assasin, so none of us will ever TRULY know.
That tis’ all.
View Comment
theres alot but theres one thing for sure who did they had the intention to do for our future its…
do something about
Also, just saying, for all the people that say, “our government hides things from us.” Hopefully, none of you who preech that are over eighteen. Because when I AM able to vote, I will never vote for anything that supports our government hiding things from us. I think if they really sat down and talked things through with the people, the people wouldn’t be panicky and freak out about every little thing. But anyways, if you’re over eighteen, and you’re nagging about our government “hiding things” THE PEOPLE GAVE THEM THAT POWER! So, unless you’re trying to get them to see that they shouldn’t hide things from the people, then please, hush. Because you’re a hypocrite. Anyways, point being, the people gave the government the power to hide things from us if they are being hidden in order to keep us save, and the people gave them that power not realizing that to the government, it mean, they could basically hide whatever the hell they wanted to.
Also, I would like whoever reads this to think about this quote. “People are panicky, chaotic, and irrational. A person is intellectual, and rational.”
Sometimes, I do believe the government should hide certain things from the people, but I don’t think they will ever do that without overstepping their boundaries. Therefore, we shouldn’t give the government that power. At all.
View Comment
its nice to see such knowledgeable people on the jfk assassination ,people who have investigated and researched the case and who are offering intelligent argument on all of the facts of this case , (sadly this is not the case for tony from dallas (you need to recheck your facts),the last sane man (who said read reclaiming history ha ha ha ha ),carlos spick and dominac damachio (who only offered insults and not one fact about the case) if you think other people are wrong why not offer an intelligent argument as to why you think this.
1/ no witness gave a statment of seeing oswald on the sixth floor ,but all witnesses (in the building)at the time said he was on the first floor at all times between 12.00 – 12.30 pm (fact).
2/not one of the top marksmen who have attempted to copy the shots ever managed to do it (fact).
3/out of 200+ plus witnesses to the assassination only 90 were questioned by the police ,58 of them said shots were fired from the grassy knoll area ,not one of the 58 were brought to the warren commision . (fact)
4/atleast two cops who searched the texas school book depository made statments saying the found a 7.65 mauser (one was seymore weitzman and a second was roger craig)weitzman worked in a gun store and was as good as an expert on guns ,he said immediately that it was a mauser . the rifle in the national archives (the rifle they say oswald used to kill kennedy)is a mmanlicher carcano (fact).
5/ atleast two witnesses to officer tippits murder saw two killers and both refused to identify oswald as the killer (the witnesses are aquilla clemmons and domingo benavides ) the bullet shells found at the scene of the killing were marked with the initials of the police offer who found them ,when he was shown these shells by the warren commission they had no initials on them ,the officer also stated that atleast one shell was from an automatic ,oswalds hand gun was certainly not an automatic (fact).
i find that people who insult people and the theories and the facts they offer (with out giving any facts them selves )are not really interested in finding out the truth. and for those who think well it happened 47 years ago it has no affect on us now ,have a look at a documentary called evidence of revision and a documentary called in plane sight .
View Comment
Any of you want evidence? Read “Reclaiming History” by Vincent Bugliosi. He didn’t even admire JFK as much as he did at the start of the book than he did at the ending; he was unbiased at the start of his investigations. I truly think that before saying ridiculous assumptions that Lee Harvey Oswald was involved in a conspiracy, you all should start researching. It’s completely absurd to conclude to this detail with no real evidence. All the conspiracy theorists have against the truth is their drawings, and I will say that again; DRAWINGS. They have to draw their evidence to manipulate people into believing that Governor Conally was situated directly in front of JFK at the time of the assassination to prove that one bullet could not have done the damage that it did. But in truth, Governor Conally was six inches to JFK’s left side, making it very possible for the same bullet to have gone through Kennedy and out to Governor Conally. Oh, and if by some chance that it was not so that Conally was to his left, which is absurd to conclude because it is supported by a video, but even if he was, what happened to the bullet that went through Kennedy? Did it just vanish? It had to have done damage to the car. But there is no evidence of such. And if the shot through his head had come from JFK’s right side, at approximately 2000 meters per second, wouldn’t you believe that there would have been even the slightest damage to the left side of JFK’s brain, if not through his head? One would presume so, but in the autopsy report, JFK’s brain was intact. The truth is that Lee Harvey Oswald is to blame. He had shot JFK from the back, and if you look at the individual frames of the Zapprudo film at 312 and 313, you would see that JFK’s head goes initially FORWARD 2.3 inches. Then it goes back, but this is a reaction to nerve damage in the brain. This is all supported by the film, and not by silly drawings. Please, do us all a favor, in get the facts straightened out before concluding anything.
View Comment
the gun was marked by the officers. The shells were then compared to the test fire cartridge from Oswald revolver taken from him at his arrest. Under oath, Cortlandt Cunningham testified that the four cartridges found were indeed fired from Oswald’s gun to the exclusion of all others-FACT!
After over fifty years not one death bed confession about a conspiracy which would have involved a great number of co-conspirators? Unlikely. I have been to the sight (Daley Plaza/Sixth Floor) and Kennedy was a sitting duck. Any capable shooter could not have missed his tarket.