The 35th President of the United States of America John F. Kennedy was assassinated on Friday, November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas, USA at 12:30 […]
Continue Reading John F. Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy Theories
The 35th President of the United States of America John F. Kennedy was assassinated on Friday, November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas, USA at 12:30 […]
Continue Reading John F. Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy Theories
Support Ron Paul, Audit the federal Reserve and abolish it, the same way JFK and Abreham Lincoln tried to do.
The Federal Reserve System was created in 1913.
Abraham Lincoln was president of the United States of America from March 4, 1861, until April 15, 1865.
Abraham Lincoln could not have opposed the Federal Reserve because he died 48 years before the Federal Reserve was created.
What other facts have you gotten wrong?
The way I see it, he was a person realy hated by the masons, a group that kills alot of people. He was going to expose them so what happened, don’t be shy, he got shot in the head.
what i think happen was jfk was going to try and stop all the messed up shit the government is doing and not telling anyone about it like area 51 i think the government thought that after a while jfk was going to release all their secrets like whats going on in area 51 19 and 20 and autec and in dulce new mexico where people say they do human test with animals and try to put them both together and aliens living and doing the experiments with the government so thats what i think happen to jfk they thought he was going to expose their secrets or i could be wrong and they killed him because he was going to approve the executive order 11110 but who knows but the government
John f. Kennedy
On November 22, 1963, when he was hardly past his first thousand days in office, John Fitzgerald Kennedy was killed by an assassin’s bullets as his motorcade wound through Dallas, Texas. Kennedy was the youngest man elected President; he was the youngest to die.
Of Irish descent, he was born in Brookline, Massachusetts, on May 29, 1917. Graduating from Harvard in 1940, he entered the Navy. In 1943, when his PT boat was rammed and sunk by a Japanese destroyer, Kennedy, despite grave injuries, led the survivors through perilous waters to safety.
Back from the war, he became a Democratic Congressman from the Boston area, advancing in 1953 to the Senate. He married Jacqueline Bouvier on September 12, 1953. In 1955, while recuperating from a back operation, he wrote Profiles in Courage, which won the Pulitzer Prize in history.
In 1956 Kennedy almost gained the Democratic nomination for Vice President, and four years later was a first-ballot nominee for President. Millions watched his television debates with the Republican candidate, Richard M. Nixon. Winning by a narrow margin in the popular vote, Kennedy became the first Roman Catholic President.
His Inaugural Address offered the memorable injunction: “Ask not what your country can do for you–ask what you can do for your country.” As President, he set out to redeem his campaign pledge to get America moving again. His economic programs launched the country on its longest sustained expansion since World War II; before his death, he laid plans for a massive assault on persisting pockets of privation and poverty.
Responding to ever more urgent demands, he took vigorous action in the cause of equal rights, calling for new civil rights legislation. His vision of America extended to the quality of the national culture and the central role of the arts in a vital society.
He wished America to resume its old mission as the first nation dedicated to the revolution of human rights. With the Alliance for Progress and the Peace Corps, he brought American idealism to the aid of developing nations. But the hard reality of the Communist challenge remained.
Shortly after his inauguration, Kennedy permitted a band of Cuban exiles, already armed and trained, to invade their homeland. The attempt to overthrow the regime of Fidel Castro was a failure. Soon thereafter, the Soviet Union renewed its campaign against West Berlin. Kennedy replied by reinforcing the Berlin garrison and increasing the Nation’s military strength, including new efforts in outer space. Confronted by this reaction, Moscow, after the erection of the Berlin Wall, relaxed its pressure in central Europe.
Instead, the Russians now sought to install nuclear missiles in Cuba. When this was discovered by air reconnaissance in October 1962, Kennedy imposed a quarantine on all offensive weapons bound for Cuba. While the world trembled on the brink of nuclear war, the Russians backed down and agreed to take the missiles away. The American response to the Cuban crisis evidently persuaded Moscow of the futility of nuclear blackmail.
Kennedy now contended that both sides had a vital interest in stopping the spread of nuclear weapons and slowing the arms race–a contention which led to the test ban treaty of 1963. The months after the Cuban crisis showed significant progress toward his goal of “a world of law and free choice, banishing the world of war and coercion.” His administration thus saw the beginning of new hope for both the equal rights of Americans and the peace of the world.
How did John f, Kennedy get assassinated?
When, Were How and Why?
The 35th President of the United States of America John F. Kennedy was assassinated on Friday, November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas, USA at 12:30 p.m. CST.
President John F. Kennedy was fatally wounded by gun shots while riding with his wife Jacqueline in the open top presidential motorcade through Dealey Plaza.
Lone gun man Lee Harvey Oswald or patsy who was quickly silenced (murdered 2 days after the assassination) in a wide sweeping government assassination conspiracy?
John F Keenedy got Shot, Because He was Going to Let America Know about The Crash Landing Ships in Oklahama state because it was Alien Activity and the goverment wanted to cover it up and not tell any one about it.
His driver shot him 3 times to make sure he was dead.
View Comment
Hay:) Every one i might sound like a nerd bot im not
Ps …I coppied it from the internet..
hehe
xx ..Skittles.. xx
There is something no one seems to have considered. If you have ever used telescopic sights you would know you lose your target after every shot due to recoil and bolt activation. It is not easy to reacquire your target in a hurry. To me this disproves the claim the Oswald could have been a lone shooter. Sure you can fire three times in the time required but not while having to acquire a target each time.
I still say for a conspiracy to work there has to be a small number of people involved. I still believe in following the money which would be in line with Defense contracts and the Vietnam War.
Doesn’t your logic just as equally prove that he could have done it. If you said he had enough time to get the shots off, then your scenerio also explains why it took 3 shots to get the job done. It is hard to re-sight after firing so that is why he wasn’t accurate. The fact that the two shots that were closest together missed their mark and the final shot that was more deliberate hit its mark makes it seem all the more plausible to me. And what I mean by miss is that I am sure each shot was intended to be a kill shot to the head since that would be the target that was available throughout.
hey… ya u skittles.. he was shot once by a rifle by a second gunman the driver didn’t shoot him and aliens don’t exist at least 4 now. also lee harvey oswald was a fall guy 4 a conspiricy!
I do love people like John. Every time I think I’m not as smart as I’d like to be someone like him makes me realise it could be worse.
Hugh, prove me wrong then!!!
I have spent years researching this and have watched the Zappruder film over and over again. There is one conclusion and one conclusion only !
Lee Harvey Oswald was the assassin, he was a sniper in the marines, you do not become a sniper in the marines if you are a lously shooter.
He was the only one to leave the TSBD early that day, why ? Guilty !!!
Another note, he did not fill his worksheet for that friday out, infact he didn’t carry out any of his normal work duties that day, his boss Roy Truly tells police that.
After leaving TSBD he makes a beeline to his rooming house at 1026 N Beckly
why does he do this ? To retrieve his revolver.
He then shoots dead Officer J D Tippit, fleeing the scene and dumping cartridges on Virginia Davis’s front lawn, those empty shells are handed to Dallas Police which later that day are matched to Oswalds revolver.
Oswald is seen actually shooting J D Tippit by several people, and fleeing from the scene.
At his arrest he punches a cop and says well it’s all over now, he then tries to fire his gun, but the web between the cops thumb and forefinger prevents the gun from being fired. ( Does this sound like and innocent man ? )
And this. this is the most laughable thing conspiracy theorists say, Oswald was shot and killed by Ruby to silence him ( Oswald ) from telling the truth.
Oswald had been custody for a day and a half, he had plenty of time to talk to Police, plenty of time to tell Police who was really involved if there was a conspiracy, but he didn’t !
Now think about this, if Jack ruby killed Oswald to shut him up…then Ruby himself must have been part of said conspiracy.
Why would Ruby being part of said conspiracy kill Oswald to silence him only to hand himself over to police which would give the Police and FBI accsess to Ruby and would put Ruby’s life in danger.
As i said above Oswald killed Kennedy and then Tippit, Ruby who was fond of Kennedy shot oswald to avenge Kennedy and to become a hero.
View Comment
Ruby shot Oswald, but not for the reasons everyone thinks. Most of those who knew the truth are dead. I have hidden this for many years and do not know how to get it out safely. Ruby thought Oswald was someone else and was ordered to shut him up. When these types of orders are not followed, they don’t just take out “you”, they take out your entire family. I know the story, but who will listen?
Dave, you are so wrong…like many others. Ruby had to take care of his mess or lose his entire family. There were several other events already in place (read my other comments) which could bring a lot of heavy hitters down. Ruby (it was thought at the time) had screwed up royally and wad to take Oswald out (who they thought was Sonny). Ruby could not tell police or FBI without huge repercussions.
I have no idea what Oswald’s connections were, but it’s obvious that much was squashed by those in power.
dave if you spent years researching this case you would be aware that the official report states only two people witnessed tippit being shot (not several).helen markham being the only one who witnessed the entire event (or so we are told )but what was her description of the man who killed tippit “short kinda chunky with bush hair ” this is clearly not oswald . when asked by the warren commission if she recognised any of the four men she was shown in a line up (which included oswald) she replied no ,no one of the four i didnt know any of them . read her warren commision testimony all of the above is in it ,the second person who witnessed a man kill tippit was domingo benavides who did not and could not identify oswald as the the man who killed tippit .
helen markham maintained that tippit stopped the man (who was walking in front of tippit with his back to tippit )the man then put his hands on the police car and leaned in the window to speak to tippit ,the window of the police car was closed (so the killer could not have leaned in to it ) check it out on youtube etc ,also the police dusted the car for prints (some thing we hear little about )strangly not one print belonging to oswald was found on the car ,again this can be checked online to prove its accurate .
further to this there were to other witnesses acquilla clemmons and frank wright ,miss clemmons said there were two men (one of them was short heavy with bushy hair ,now where did we hear that description before ? ah yes i remember from helen markham see above )frank wright saw officer tippit being shot and fall to the floor and the man who shot him wore a black coat (now what colour was the coat the police found that they saw was oswalds ? it was a light tan not black) again all these are facts and can be checked online to show they are accurate .
frank whalley the cab driver who says his passenger was oswald said oswald wore a faded blue coat while in his cab ,a few minutes later oswald walks into his rooming house and earlene roberts (his landlady ) says he wore only a shirt and let wearing a coat (but that the coat the warren commision showed her the light tan coat is not the coat oswald wore as it was darker) what did the witness at the tippit murder scene say the killer wore (helen markham said he wore a white coat) frank wright said a long black coat (the davis girls said the killer wore a dark or black coat )and some people say the man they saw running wore a light coloured coat .
it has never been proven that the tan coat that was found was oswalds .
oswald had two coats a tan or cream coat and a blue coat (whalley said he wore a faded blue coat in his cab )but this coat is found still in the book depository days later . marina verified that oswald had only two coats (and that she washed all his clothes) yet the coat found had a laundry tag on it ,this tag was never traced and so the coat was never linked to oswald in anyway .
oswalds own marine colleagues said he was a lousy shot (the term they used is maggies drawers )no expert shooter has ever managed to replicate the the shooting job they say oswald did .people say it was easy dealley plaza is a small place (thats not why they failed ) the zapruder film established a time line for the shots and a tree was in the way for part of this time thats why they couldnt replicate it .
also oswald wasnt the only employee to leave the book depository that day (to say otherwise is patently false )but yes he did not return .mr trully the building supervisor while with officer baker vouched for oswald and he was allowed to leave the building ,employees were being stopped going out the front door (including oswald ) but again he is vouched for and left leave ,other employees complained about this .
when it comes to this case a lot of people can be mistaken with there information (for various reasons such as not properly researching it ,or just because they are new to the case and are still learning ) others know the case very well and intentionally misquote/misrepresent the evidence or what witnesses said and saw ,and they omit certain vital evidence .now one has to ask themselves why would a person want to do that ? ,all i will say is check out the word disinformation .
View Comment
You must be a relative of Robert Groden. Mrs. Markham did in fact positively identify Oswald as the person who killed Tippet. She denied to the Warren Commission that she ever referred to him as being short and stocky. She did admit to saying that he was “a little bit bushy”. This was is reference to his hair not being combed. The reference that you tried to use was from her initial phone call which she intially denied even happened. But at headquarters she gave a description that was accurate of Oswald then identified him in a lineup. Now in reading the Warren report, it would sound like maybe her testimony should be discredited, but her you are taking part of what she said (and out of context) and trying to use it to show his innocence. I just dont get it.
The king of disinformation
Great job, Dave. Glad to have someone else here that thinks like me. Some of our arguments are exactly alike. One that I also use is the fact that Zapruder 313 Clearly shows the headshot. In this still one can plainly see that a halo of blood and brain matter exists in front of Kennedy’s face (consistent with an exit wound from the front) and a steam of brain matter and blood angling forward and upward (also indicating a exit wound from in front) Not one conpiracy theorist on here will touch that one. The go back and bring up the old Oliver Stone “back and to the left” like they know something about physics and Newton’s law. The fact that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction completely covers this argument. If he was hit in the back rear of his head then his head would end up going back and to the left. But initially his head would go forward because of the force applied from behind. I have a great GIF showing that his head does move forward first. (probably Zapruder frames 312 -314 put together). So thank you for being part of this small group. I guess we shouldn’t expect anything different on a site that uses the word conspiracy first. I guess no one can interpret that the word hoax is directed to all those who think Oswald wasn’t involved.
reply to dave