When scientists says we can’t go back for x amount of years is because just going there for a couple of days is not the objective. The goal is to setup a long term staging area, to which we need a shelter; several weeks to several months also LONG TERM exposure to radiation, what are the effects? and how to combat those effects? With larger payloads and possibly larger crews, we need more than the Saturn 5 Rocket Booster, we need a new rocket capable lifting that much weight. And a new craft to get us there and back. The Shuttle is not an option, as that was not designed for liftoff from an unstable and uneven surface, much less any surface.
More Comments by TK421
As many of you have stated that the burden of proof lies with NASA, you have it backwards. NASA has supplied “proof” in the form of eye witness accounts, photos, video, hardware used during the missions, moon rocks, …
More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax by TK421
Actually…
As many of you have stated that the burden of proof lies with NASA, you have it backwards. NASA has supplied “proof” in the form of eye witness accounts, photos, video, hardware used during the missions, moon rocks, …