Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax by sarah.

i am afraid that i can prove all of the “hoax” theories wrong, sorry to dissapoint.
lets start from the begining.(btw im taking time out of my homework on the moon landing to wright this so listen up)

if armstrong was first on the moon, who took the photo?-simple, the camera was on a simple tripod ‘arm’ that extended out from the side of the rocket.

why does the flag move if thier is no wind?- because they had to jam the pole into the earth(which moved the flag), and with no friction to stop it, the flag continued to sway afterwards, and then became stationary again

why are there no stars in the photo?- because to take a photo of whattever they were taking a photo of, they had to use the right exposure, with the sun shining this would of been very hard to see in the photos(btw NASA has some of the greatest minds in the world, do you really think they would forget the stars if they wanted to fake it?seriously people…)

why is there a ‘c’ on a rock in one of the photos- in the origonal there is no ‘c’, this is just a tiny hair that was in the way during the copying process

why is there the same background?- with no atmosphere it is hard to gage distance, it could be 10 or 100 miles away and you wouldnt see the difference

why did was there shadows in more than one direction if the only light source was the sun?-the surface of the moon is very reflective, scattering light in different directions,casting different shadows

why was there footprints if the sand if it was not wet?- barcarbonate of soda is not wet, yes? sprinkle some on your kitchen floor and tread on it it leaves a footprint, yes? i rest my case.

why was there dust on the lander if there was no wind to blow it on it- because with no atmosphere the dust goes straight up and back down again, when the lander landed it blew dust up, it came straight back down on the lander.

theres loads more but i seriously have to get back to that homework. still not convinced? visit http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/index.html

if your still not satisfied then you are a pesimist who cant admit thier wrong about one of the greatest achievments in man kind and i think you need to readjust your perspective on life.

p.s if your someone who i just mentioned than i hope you new the answers behind the hoax theries but wont believe because otherwise you are dumber than a 13 year old [yes, i may be only 13 but at least i dont spend my free time making up conspiracy theries to do with nasa] also, TEST your theries before you make a judgement, it saves a lot of insult to those who gave thier lives work to the apollo missions.

thx for listening

More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax by sarah


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax

P.s sorry about the typos/spelling mistakes above, i was typing v. quick …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax

Just to clear a few things up (although,as i said, it is clearly explained on http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/index.html ), what Joel said about thier being no gravity on the moon, that isnt strictly true. there is gravity, but not a lot …


More Comments by sarah


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax

P.s sorry about the typos/spelling mistakes above, i was typing v. quick …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax

Just to clear a few things up (although,as i said, it is clearly explained on http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/index.html ), what Joel said about thier being no gravity on the moon, that isnt strictly true. there is gravity, but not a lot …