In 1959 Bill Kaysing predicted that at that time, the chances of getting a man to the moon and back alive were 0.0014%, taking into […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
In 1959 Bill Kaysing predicted that at that time, the chances of getting a man to the moon and back alive were 0.0014%, taking into […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
All of you Moon landing “skeptics” have clearly devoted hours and hours of time poring over the conspiracy angle. How much time have you actually devoted to researching the Apollo program or, good gravy, familiarizing yourselves with basic physical science principles? If you would simply spend half as much time learning something useful about the space program rather than accepting, without ctitical analysis or technical knowledge, the absurd claims my by hoax enthusiasts, you’d be able to answer your own preposterous questions.
And to clarify a peculiar attitude advanced by a number of you, the burden of proof IS on YOU. YOU are challenging the historical record, so YOU have to make YOUR case. Since you can’t come up with a challenge that cannot be easily addressed by applying the most fundamental scientific analysis, you have no proof of a hoax and you never will.
Here’s the thing. The Soviets were the best at working conspiracies. Why didn’t they fake a landing before we did? If I follow your reasoning, there really was no Cold War and the USSR was in cahoots with the USA to expose the shortcomings of soviet communism! That’s why the Soviets didn’t rat us out. Yeah. That must be it.
The security around Apollo Program was nothing like what went on during the Manhattan Project. Just go to the library and look at how many news articles from the early- and mid-1960s follow the progress of the project. Oh, wait. All of the nation’s newspapers and their employees were in on the conspiracy, too.
In fact, to pull off this hoax, every citizen of Earth, except American taxpayers, was in on it.
Can you see why this whole conspiracy angle just doesn’t make it? Science, common sense and rational thinking simply undercut the entire premise. Let it go.
View Comment
please note that I’m not asking anyone to shut their mouths.. I’m suggesting that it is possible that men with integrity can be silenced. You threaten their familys or their friends, you can buy their silence, or force it. I won’t attack the integrety of anyone in this matter since I don’t know who is a willing participant and who isn’t. I feel that the ground crews and the mission control personelle had no Idea any of it was faked. They would be easy to fool and also the most compelling witnesses attesting that it all was real and it happened. There are people that had full knowledge of what happened and are filthy dirty in the creation of the lie.
has anyone ever wondered why on the film of the moon buggy the dust from the wheels does not stay in the air longer given that the gravity is a lot less on the moon?
You’re almost on the right track with the moon buggy dust. Since there is no atmosphere, there is no air to support the dust, and it will fall to the surface without any frictional resistance from the air. That is why it does not stay aloft. The question that can’t be answered is why is it just being tossed up as far as dust with normal earth gravity. It would fall quickly, but it should be tossed much further above the surface before it descends. By the same tolken as the first explanation, there is no frictional resistance from air to stop it from ascending, and there is reduced gravitational pull to stop its ascent as well. That buggy should be throwing a big rooster of cloudless debris.
Terry, my research into the lunar hoax is because there were so many questions I had about how it possibly could have been done. I grew up believing we went there. I studied it and researched it… but there were a lot of things that didn’t make sense as I got older and learned more about radio telemetry and radiation and physics and aerospace technology. Most of my questions were already being asked by others as I searched for information. As for your Russia cold war stuff, Of course there was a cold war. Of course Russia wanted to beat us to the moon. They were decades away from doing it. When we pulled it out of our hat coming from behind it blew them away. The evidence was extremely convincing and not all of the information available to us today was available then. If we could trick U.S. aeronautical engineers that worked on the program, how hard do you think it was to trick Soviets that had nothing but low res pictures to go on? We weren’t so technologically advanced that no one would be able to follow in our footsteps. We weren’t so technologically advanced that we won’t be able to repeat our amazing feat for another 20 years from now. You never will be able to look past what was spoon fed to you, but others will. Fortunately some good can come from your post.
View Comment
To the person who said that the Russians would have told the Press about the Americans faking the moon landing. Which press would these Russians tell? Any reporter here in the U.S. who 1) valued their job 2) valued their life would not have ran a story like that. Orders from the White House would have surely at least had this reporter fired if not murdered. So tell me how would any Americans in the 60s read anything about Russians screaming about a hoax? No newspapers, no TV channels, no news channels would have ran a story like that if they wanted to live to see another day. What do you think the FBI and CIA are really for? Well, that’s part of there job. Got to keep track of the US Citizens and what they know.
Only reason why anyone is talking about 9/11 as a conspiracy is because of the internet. In 1960, no one would hear of these theories because no reporter would dare write anything like that,
View Comment
i have to say i want to believe but the evidence is overwhelming against us going. I have seen many, many videos including one where an astronaut was saluting the flag and it was waving but then stopped. A minute goes by and he walks past the flag with about a couple of feet in between him and the flag and when he passes by it, the flag (primarily the bottom corner begins to wave. Since there is no atmosphere on the moon this action is impossible, unless he was on earth. I did not come to the conclusion of this by watching one video, this has been over and over and over of research. Its is obvious they were using a wire system to by the way they moved and on one video it appeared they were using a trmapoline to jump, which was out of view but if you look at them they appear to go higher and higher. I could go on and on and I will say this. Did anyone think that 30-50 years later people would ever question this? The thinking back then was different
View Comment
Lets see in 1969 everyone was TOLD this happened, and reinforced it with newspapers, tv, and word of mouth. In 69 everyone feared Russia thanks to the same model of information pushers. In 69 everyone had no other source to gather the info for them selves, They just swallowed the Kool-aid they were given becasuse they trusted the kool-aid producers.
OF course they dont believe in the Hoax theorys, just like the church pushes their innocense through mass they dont doubt there is a god.
If you are told that the stove is hot and you dont believe your teacher of that fact you touch the stove and you get burned. But if you trust the teacher you accept it and continue to accept it and never doubt you teacher again. Well in the case of the moon landing they still trust their teachers. So its no wonder they all can’t believe it could be fake. They have swallowed the Kool-aid and keep swallowing it because they, like any good church going fool, have no basis or will power to think outside the box.
These believers of god and moon landings are made up of people so stupid, fearful, who have no ambition of their own, who can’t think for themselves, they would rather trust at face value things people with more power than them feed them as long as they are silent. Talk about a sad existance of a lifeform. And they are breeding. Yikes!
“My daddy told me they landed on the moon so I believe them, why would they lie to me”,
“Daddy is it true did they go to the moon?”
“Yes son\daughter they did”
And so they never question it, now that’s just plain ignorant.
Money is the ultimate tool to contol the masses, those with it make the stories, and those without it live by the rules of those who have it. Plain and simple. Religion and money go hand in hand, the church pays no taxes but all others do. So if you pay no taxes you have more money than those who do. Duh! Money and Fear are the Conspirsies (sp) and they have you by the balls. These is the true crimes of humanity and I am amazed that nobody else sees this, yet at the same time I am not amazed that nobody sees this becasue when they own the informaition they can bend it all they want.
Time has come with the age of technology and the Internet to finally overthrow these losers and bring them to justice via the Gallows pole. Their little ruse has been exposed and they will either be fleeing from the masses or they will be swinging in the wind. So put down the Kool-aid or become a statistic in which you may or may not deserve.
Man on the moon in 69 lol ha ha what a friggn joke.
“I’ve been around the world and found only stupid people are breeding” ….
When Japan or China brings back the first evidance of no lunar landings you’ll see and then you will have to rethink everything and the lies of your upbringing will send you into thearpy and then you’ll change your tune about what you believe.
The only positive side to this whole thing is that the young female offspring of those who were children back then are easy targets for predators. Its easy to steal a blind mans soup. And even easier to steal the virginity the daughters of those peoples’ daughters who believe people went to the moon… ha ha ha lol… Nothing like free sex.
Wake up or shut up.
View Comment
The one problem with the lunar hoax is that there is not a single scientist, or aerospace engineer who supports it. To them, you idiots are a joke, like fundamentalists who ignore every bit of science that disagrees with their literal interpretation of the bible. All that your theories prove is your complete lack of basic scientific knowledge. Ultimately this makes debunkings pointless since you lack the basic knowledge to understand them and will simply accuse the person of being a NASA stooge.
One person mentioned the possibility of the government using threats against the media to keep them silent. The problem with this is that our president during the moon landings was Nixon, one of our more amoral commander in chiefs, and even he could not keep the watergate conspiracy silent. That conspiracy, was much smaller than what would be required for the moon landing. Also, what about media outside the United States and even in the USSR, are we supposed to believe that the government threatened them as well.
If you really are as open-minded as you claim you can find a detailed debunking by an aerospace engineer at .
Oh, and as a fan of James Bond, I should probably mention that the book Diamonds are Forever does not mention anything about the moon or a moon buggy at all.
View Comment
You are all stupid conspiracy-theorists. What, do you think there isn’t any light on the moon or something? Hello? Ever heard of a little thing called the SUN that lights up the earth so wthat we can live? Duh! The light from the earth would be enough to shine on the moon a little, and that’s why we can see it so clearly at night! Plus there’s flash on both video and photo cameras! That would definetly be enough to light up an astronaut! You can see that the person who took the picture of the astronaut on the moon was totally on a surface unlike that of a movie studio. And don’t you think that there were eyewitnesses who SAW APOLLO 11 TAKE OFF? NASA would not be dumb enough not to have them there so someone could prove they landed on the moon!
By saying that Apollo 11 is a hoax, then you’re disgracing our country. Go crawl under a rock, American-haters. You can shove this stupid theory up your snooty a**.
View Comment
Nice… no one said the appolo rocket didn’t launch. There was plenty of light to take pictures with. There was however, no flash photography, we didn’t have the ability to automate a light sensor with a aperature control to automatically adjust for flash fill on the moon in 1969… but we had the ability to send people to the moon? The moon isn’t lit at night by reflected light from the earth genius… its lit by light shining directly on the lunar surface from the sun… as the earth passes between the moon and the sun, it creates the lunar cycle.. (half, full, crescent, etc..) before you jump into a conversation waving your american flag, educate yourself. Your a prime example of the ignorance that runs our country.
It was Vice president Lyndon Johnson, tasked with researching the viability of a lunar landing, who informed Kenedy that we would be able to orbit men around the moon with a possible team landing on the surface back in 1961. He was given this task in order to find a campaign that would bolster American confidence immediately following the “Bay of Pigs” incident, and the russians successfull orbit of a man around the earth. When he took office after Kenedy’s assasination, it was under Lyndon Johnsons Presidency that the lunar missions development progressed, and it was his credibility on the line. It was in his last year of office in July 1969 when apollo 11 touched down. Were this whole thing a Hoax, it would have been dropped in Nixon’s lap like a hand grenade. Is it any wonder that Nixon scrubbed the last 4 scheduled lunar missions and declared that we would not be returning to the moon anytime in the forseeable future?
These reputable scientists that you speak of, are they the same ones that are scrambling to develop a vehicle to get us to the moon right now? Are they the same ones that developed the failure of a space shuttle program? (8 missions per year v.s. the intended 25-60 missions per year)
There isn’t question that we had the technology to send an unmanned craft to orbit the moon in 1969, but to send human cargo, and to return them, let alone land them and drive around in a moon buggy is rediculous.
View Comment
Quote “it was under Lyndon Johnsons Presidency that the lunar missions development progressed, and it was his credibility on the line. It was in his last year of office in July 1969 when apollo 11 touched down.”
It is hard to take what you say as credible when you get simple facts wrong. Nixon was inaugurated on January 20th 1969, and all six manned moon landings were during Nixon’s presidency.