Whether the conspiracy was possible or if there was a motive for faking the landings, is a big part of the moon hoax. Many conspiracy […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?
Whether the conspiracy was possible or if there was a motive for faking the landings, is a big part of the moon hoax. Many conspiracy […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?
response about the satellite dishes…. if our sat dishes are receiving a signal from space, why not point them up, and why does the installer need a compass to point them a certain direction….
seriously.
OUR satellite dishes are NOT receiving signals from space. They are pointed towardother transmitters, usually placed on tall radio towers, that are receiving a signal from a very larger and powerful dish somewhere that us actually receiving a signal from a satellite. OUR dishes are only receiving a relayed message. They are NOWHERE near powerful enough to communicate with space satellites.
The satellite dishes do pick up a signal directly from a satellite.
But the dish has to be pointed at a satellite that is in a geostationary orbit, meaning, it stays in the same place relative to the Earth. Quite often though, these satellites aren’t directly above the dish, hence the compass.
Oh and if the dishes were pointed at a transmitting tower it would completely defeat the point of having satellite tv and we might has well go back to traditional broadcast.
Basically Jim, stop trying to find a conspiracy theory in everything and just be happy you can sit and watch tv at night without the aliens taking you away.
i rekcon the moon landings were faked because did they once say when you in space shadows can’t be seen has it so dark
The whole hoax theory makes me so mad! I can’t see how people can sit there and deny this thing ever happened. The rockets launched, we all saw that. There are photos and film of the Apollo spacecraft in orbit around the Moon. There is film of astronauts jumping up and down, clearly in incredibly low gravity. How could anyone have faked this sort of stuff with the photographic capabilities of 1969? The critics of the lunar surface photographs need to wake up and face the facts. The Apollo astronauts were on a different world – things were bound to look different. The questionable shadows people keep banging on about were probably down to the fact that the Moon is drastically different in shape and surface area to Earth, hence shadows and horizons looked strange to our eyes. The Moon exists in unfamiliar physics. If the landings were faked then how do you explain the Apollo 13 disaster? Would NASA really have tried killing their own men? The whole Apollo saga was so full of surprises, you couldn’t make it up if you tried. If there was a conspiracy then someone involved with the agency at the time would have broken by now and come forward with the truth. With a powerful enough telescope, Apollo hardware is just about visible on the Moon. Rock samples from the Moon exist on Earth, and there are people still alive today who were lucky enough to walk on it. Personally, I don’t blame Buzz Aldrin for punching that paranoid conspiracy nut. If Aldrin hadn’t really been there, he would have shrugged it off! So please people, stop rubbishing the greatest achievement in human history, and look forward to when we return in 2020.
View Comment
My question is who else has something to gain by making the US government look foolish by making claims that the moon landing was indeed a hoax?
Thank you, Mark Rothwell. Many of these comments show the dire need for better science education in our schools.
When the U.S. government’s own evidence contradicts the government’s own claims, does that make you want to believe the government? (When it talks out of which side of its mouth?)
OBJECTS IN MIRROR ARE CLOSER THAN THEY APPEAR:
http://911theory.info/cached/beverlyunderground.com/rabbithole3.htm
Note the size of the reflection of the Sun in the full-face-shield convex visor. Physics/optics don’t lie, but [all] governments do! Get used to it, and please grow up, already.
If the USA really went to the moon, all they have to do is shoot a sattelite up in space to the moon and take a picture from the flag en de lander wich would still be standing there on the surface. Not a really difficult thing to do wright? The still know precisely where they landed and took off.
How do you make conspirators keep secrets? Get the players involved with something highly illegal and/or embassing and blackmail them.
There have recently been as far as I remember from the news two projects to photograph and map the moon one from China (http://yolearnchinese.com/archives/chinese-moon-map-from-change-released) one from USA (http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/clementine.html).
There is also google Maps: http://www.google.com/moon/
I think you will find that none of these images which are high resolution show ANY evidence that the USA landed on the moon. The images from google for example which come from NASA show an outline of the EVA but no disturbance of the surrounding area.