“Then you’re a gullible fool who hasn’t bothered to learn anything about

Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence by ner0.

“Then you’re a gullible fool who hasn’t bothered to learn anything about Apollo.”

Sure, I picked up a few things here and there but never put that much effort in disseminating Apollo material. I am as gullible as the next guy who believes in moon landings only based on footage and images without dissemination, you are just convinced beyond any doubt it’s not the other way around. As for calling me a fool is unnecessary, but unfortunately you seem to like the term so much.

“What does the year you were born have to do with the reality of Apollo landing on the Moon? Are you really saying “it didn’t happen because I wasn’t there to witness it”? Do you also believe the contents of your refrigerator cease to exist when you close the door just because you can no longer see it?”

In a way yes, that’s exactly what I am saying. And someday developments in science could really prove that contents of your refrigerator cease to exist when you close the door. Schroedinger paradox suggests something like that. That’s off topic of course. I’m just saying that I feel less compelled to believe on moon landings because:
a) I’m a gullible fool;
b) Not being a part of Apollo “reality”, I have no emotion attached to the USA or moon landings, which could convince a gullible fool like me in a glimpse;
c) Reading comments like yours;

“I’m not so egotistical that I believe the universe only began when I was born.”

That’s what you got out of my comment, it doesn’t mean that it was my intention to say. English is not my mother language so I guess I wrote nonsense rather than being misinterpreted, also it means I won’t be as good as you when it comes to insults . Either way, keep throwing insults at my personality, you seem to take personal satisfaction from it. Somehow it explains why you post comments the way you do.

“Believing in what you want to believe rather than what the facts support is irrational. Why are you so proud of that? It’s foolish.”

Well yes, and no. It’s impossible from your stand point to extract anything about my proud. Also you seem to think that calling someone a fool makes you right every time.

“Saying that you find it “easier” to believe it was a hoax sounds like laziness to me. You find it easier because you aren’t putting any effort into verifying what other conspiracy theorists are telling you. You are accepting their claims as facts without even bothering to look into it yourself. That, my friend, makes you the “sheep” that you accuse NASA supporters of being.”

No, I meant it would be less disappointing. Even if I don’t put enough effort into verifying “other” conspiracy theorists views I doubt you could convince the most persistent and informed ones with your smart mouth. Some of them made compelling documentaries and points of view, as for you, not that compelling. Bear in mind that I don’t use the term “sheep”, I don’t judge people that way, you on the other hand seem to use pre-designed answers from past arguments.

“That sounds like just another way of saying “ignorance is bliss”. I almost feel sorry for you.”

Sure, anything you say boss.

In sum you say a lot (of shit) but you’re not as constructive as you think you are. I’m not above or bellow you, I’m aside.
I respect your point of view and agree that my lack of understanding about Apollo missions may be one of the reasons of my skepticism and disbelief. It couldn’t matter less.