Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence by LunarOrbit.

You said “all six missions to the Moon” but neglected to mention that the only reason there weren’t 7 landings on the Moon is because one of them failed and almost killed 3 astronauts in the process. You’re being dishonest by not mentioning that while saying the missions to the Moon went “perfectly”.

What difference does it make whether the problem occurred on the Moon or en route to the Moon? If your point is that the technology should have failed at some point… well, it did! The Apollo 13 spacecraft had a major life threatening malfunction that lead to the cancellation of the landing… and you don’t consider that an imperfect mission?

You’re saying they had a 100% success rate when in reality they only had a 85% success rate because 1 of the 7 landing attempts failed.

“no one got hurt or died”

Yeah… on the Moon. Right. Maybe that’s because NASA isn’t reckless or incompetent. They wouldn’t have sent people to the Moon without some confidence that the technology was up to the task.

They tested the Lunar Module in Earth orbit and lunar orbit before actually attempting a landing. And the individual spacecraft systems had been tested extensively on Earth for years before they ever actually put astronauts in it.

“nor did the landing craft fail and leave any one behind.”

It almost did strand the Apollo 11 crew on the Moon.

As Neil and Buzz were preparing to leave the Moon they discovered that the switch that armed the ascent rocket had been broken off (probably by the astronauts bumping into it with their cumbersome spacesuits). It was only because Buzz was able to use the tip of his pen to flip the switch that they got off the Moon.

“on earth some 10 astronauts died under unnormal or ‘suspicious’ circumstances!”

There is nothing at all “unnormal” or suspicious about any of their deaths. Do you even know how they died?

One astronaut died in a plane crash when a goose hit his canopy as he was landing. Does the CIA employ suicidal geese?

Two astronauts died in another plane crash when their plane hit a building in heavy fog. Fog is an extremely dangerous hazard and has killed many pilots. How is it suspicious?

Another astronaut died in a car crash. It happens all the time.

Three astronauts died in the Apollo 1 fire which was the result of several design flaws in a brand new spacecraft design.

Why would NASA kill astronauts in such a high profile way that would lead people to question whether going to the Moon was worth risking the astronauts lives? The Apollo 1 fire nearly ended the Apollo program, which would obviously not be beneficial to NASAs budget.

More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence by LunarOrbit


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

For me it is that easy to say that the moon landings never happened.

Then you’re a gullible fool who hasn’t bothered to learn anything about Apollo.

And in a sense they never did because I wasn’t born yet when they occurred.

What …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

I did not verify any of the “facts” stated here

Maybe you should. You’d look less like a fool if you didn’t constantly cite unverified claims.

Even if most of the alleged US Moon rocks are real, the Russians were able to …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

That is why no one takes you HBs seriously. You can’t get your stories straight. We see HBs saying robotic probes put the laser reflectors on the Moon… and then other HBs who say the lasers were simply reflected off …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

You can reflect a laser off the moon’s surface.
No reflector required.

True, but a lot more of the laser’s light is reflected when a reflector is used. The reflectors reflect all light back in the direction it came from. Light reflected …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

…do you get payed? Can you put a word for me?

Ah, yes, the old “accuse the debunkers of being paid government agents” trick. Is that all you’ve got left? It’s a pathetic argument.

Where can I find the manual you use …


More Comments by LunarOrbit


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence

My main concern is that if they really did land on the moon in 1969, then why was there not a single attempt to repeat the feat

Ummm… NASA landed men on the Moon five more times after Apollo 11.

Don’t we …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

For me it is that easy to say that the moon landings never happened.

Then you’re a gullible fool who hasn’t bothered to learn anything about Apollo.

And in a sense they never did because I wasn’t born yet when they occurred.

What …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

I did not verify any of the “facts” stated here

Maybe you should. You’d look less like a fool if you didn’t constantly cite unverified claims.

Even if most of the alleged US Moon rocks are real, the Russians were able to …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

That is why no one takes you HBs seriously. You can’t get your stories straight. We see HBs saying robotic probes put the laser reflectors on the Moon… and then other HBs who say the lasers were simply reflected off …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

You can reflect a laser off the moon’s surface.
No reflector required.

True, but a lot more of the laser’s light is reflected when a reflector is used. The reflectors reflect all light back in the direction it came from. Light reflected …