Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence by LunarOrbit.

My main concern is that if they really did land on the moon in 1969, then why was there not a single attempt to repeat the feat

Ummm… NASA landed men on the Moon five more times after Apollo 11.

Don’t we have the technology…

There are no major technical obstacles to going to the Moon. NASA just needs to build a new spacecraft and heavy-lift rocket to replace the Space Shuttles first.

…or the willingness to do it now.

Bingo. You just hit the nail on the head. Going to the Moon is very expensive and a lot of people don’t understand the benefits of doing it so they don’t see the point. Without support from the taxpayers and the politicians NASA can’t fund anything as expensive as missions to the Moon.

More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence by LunarOrbit


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence

“There are so many anomalies with them, and more are being found all the time.”

What is more believable? That a bunch of amateur conspiracy theorists have found anomalies in the Apollo photographs that professional historians haven’t noticed over the course …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence

It does not matter if a lot of people believe the moon landings were faked. The truth is not determined by a vote. If a lot of people believed in the tooth fairy would that make it true?

What matters are …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence

I agree. We can’t even fake something like that convincingly today, never mind 40 years ago.

Just watch movies like Apollo 13, From the Earth to the Moon, or the trailer for Transformers 3. You’ll find all sorts of flaws like …


More Comments by LunarOrbit


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

For me it is that easy to say that the moon landings never happened.

Then you’re a gullible fool who hasn’t bothered to learn anything about Apollo.

And in a sense they never did because I wasn’t born yet when they occurred.

What …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

I did not verify any of the “facts” stated here

Maybe you should. You’d look less like a fool if you didn’t constantly cite unverified claims.

Even if most of the alleged US Moon rocks are real, the Russians were able to …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

That is why no one takes you HBs seriously. You can’t get your stories straight. We see HBs saying robotic probes put the laser reflectors on the Moon… and then other HBs who say the lasers were simply reflected off …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

You can reflect a laser off the moon’s surface.
No reflector required.

True, but a lot more of the laser’s light is reflected when a reflector is used. The reflectors reflect all light back in the direction it came from. Light reflected …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

…do you get payed? Can you put a word for me?

Ah, yes, the old “accuse the debunkers of being paid government agents” trick. Is that all you’ve got left? It’s a pathetic argument.

Where can I find the manual you use …