NASA image: AS17-141-21608HR from:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21608HR.jpg
(Who took the picture? The person -stage worker- in the helmet’s reflection does not have a camera on his chest and a life support system on his back, and he is not facing in the right direction to take the picture.)
I do not except shade arguments from either side (believers or sceptics). If I did then I would consider it completely proven that NO Astronaut ever landed on the Moon. Why I don’t believe in the shade arguments? One day I was hiking out for climbing in the Rocky Mountains and kept watching my shade. I often stopped and analysed the shade. Even when I was there and could examine all the facts it was often difficult to explain the geometry of my shade….
The following video agrees with your (jfb above) explanation but at the same time shows the difficulties involved.
What is interesting is how well your imagination works jfb when to “fill in” a picture so as to make it a believable Moon landing evidence. I bet however, you do not see any of the Disneyland features on the same image. Your imagination suddenly takes a dive ?)
AS15-87-11695, AS15-87-11696, AS15-87-11697, AS15-87-11698, AS15-87-11699
jfb, what do you see on these images and is there anything wrong with these images:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11696HR.jpg
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11695HR.jpg
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11697HR.jpg
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11698HR.jpg
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11698HR.jpg
Maybe, just maybe this will be a more clear case.
More Comments by Alex
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof
My best answer to rrc’s question (above):
NASA image: AS17-141-21608HR from:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21608HR.jpg
The magnified helmet of AS17-141-21608HR
Who took the picture? The person (stage worker) in the helmet’s reflection does not have a camera and he is not facing in the right direction. After …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
When you watch the videos of the lift-offs one thing is clear: “This is not an acceptable evidence of Lunar landing.”. Why? The quality is so poor that anybody could have created these videos on Earth. No proof, not even …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
Yes jfb (above) I looked at http://www.spacex.com (Falcon 9) and also on Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/spacexchannel
http://www.youtube.com/spacexchannel#p/c/F0D3A9748DC5E42D/1/UTwRxtmQ9IY
This is not very good evidence because the most important video is animation. However, they show flame even from a large distance. The NASA videos show no …
LIFT OFF WITHOUT DUST AND FLAME
Apollo 15,16,17 Lift off: Lack of blowing dust and lack of flame. NASA believers claim that there should not have been a flame, dust etc…
For the Apollo lunar ascent and descent module single main engine and sixteen attitude control thrusters, …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence
I find that the people who do not believe the NASA story are generally better educated, but it is more important that they are INDEPENDENT thinkers.
Many of the Apollo Moon photos have the stars in them if you lighten up …
More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof by Alex
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof
My best answer to rrc’s question (above):
NASA image: AS17-141-21608HR from:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21608HR.jpg
The magnified helmet of AS17-141-21608HR
Who took the picture? The person (stage worker) in the helmet’s reflection does not have a camera and he is not facing in the right direction. After …