My best answer to rrc’s question (above):
NASA image: AS17-141-21608HR from:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21608HR.jpg
The magnified helmet of AS17-141-21608HR
Who took the picture? The person (stage worker) in the helmet’s reflection does not have a camera and he is not facing in the right direction. After that, it seems to be only a minor detail that the Astronaut in the reflection does not have “life support” on his back.
Magnify the picture and many Disney Land features on the rocks will be obvious.
NASA believers call this scientific/photographic evidence, but what is it proving?
rrc, I also have a question for you: What do you see on the images and what is wrong with these images:
AS15-87-11695, AS15-87-11697, AS15-87-11698, AS15-87-11699 ?
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11696HR.jpg
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11695HR.jpg
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11697HR.jpg
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11698HR.jpg
More Comments by Alex
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof
NASA image: AS17-141-21608HR from:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21608HR.jpg
(Who took the picture? The person -stage worker- in the helmet’s reflection does not have a camera on his chest and a life support system on his back, and he is not facing in the right direction …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
When you watch the videos of the lift-offs one thing is clear: “This is not an acceptable evidence of Lunar landing.”. Why? The quality is so poor that anybody could have created these videos on Earth. No proof, not even …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
Yes jfb (above) I looked at http://www.spacex.com (Falcon 9) and also on Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/spacexchannel
http://www.youtube.com/spacexchannel#p/c/F0D3A9748DC5E42D/1/UTwRxtmQ9IY
This is not very good evidence because the most important video is animation. However, they show flame even from a large distance. The NASA videos show no …
LIFT OFF WITHOUT DUST AND FLAME
Apollo 15,16,17 Lift off: Lack of blowing dust and lack of flame. NASA believers claim that there should not have been a flame, dust etc…
For the Apollo lunar ascent and descent module single main engine and sixteen attitude control thrusters, …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence
I find that the people who do not believe the NASA story are generally better educated, but it is more important that they are INDEPENDENT thinkers.
Many of the Apollo Moon photos have the stars in them if you lighten up …
More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof by Alex
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof
NASA image: AS17-141-21608HR from:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21608HR.jpg
(Who took the picture? The person -stage worker- in the helmet’s reflection does not have a camera on his chest and a life support system on his back, and he is not facing in the right direction …