First to even determine if there is a 911 conspiracy, we must find what, if anything, is wrong with the official statement. This for ease […]
Continue Reading 9/11 Conspiracy Theories: Could Terrorists Hi-Jack a Plane?
First to even determine if there is a 911 conspiracy, we must find what, if anything, is wrong with the official statement. This for ease […]
Continue Reading 9/11 Conspiracy Theories: Could Terrorists Hi-Jack a Plane?
Being from outside America i only seen the tv footage and read the papers and stuff. But from where i was sitting and from what i seen
I think the government was behind it all.
Apparently, the towers were steel structures yeh ? built to prevent them from collapsing. (or so we’ve heard) So realisticly they should not have collapsed. but the way they fell straight downwards suggested signs of controlled demolition. And also from what ive read and heard, detinators and explosives were found at ground zero.
Bush was heavy for war so he needed reason?
He wanted Americans to hate someone so much they wanted to fight.
After so many americans being so angry with him winning presidency he needed them on his side.
But would he really go to the extent of murder to get what he wanted?
lets be fair his father was driven by war, and so was he!
Just seems a little too convenient for me!
Keep in mind i’m saying apparently, and what ive heard, implying that this is only theory and not fact!…
View Comment
Ye they fell straight down so what hit wtc 3 the Hilton? WTC south
So there goes the they fell straight down lie
To Rebecca.
Reading your comment I can’t help feeling that you represent the views of a large number of people who have watched videos on Youtube and other sites on the internet and been taken in by the slanted,deceptive distortions of the facts that these websites present. They are basically propaganda and people can be taken in by propoganda. I am from outside America too and seeing the way people are being manipulated by these videos and websites is really amazing.The evidence you put forward in your comment is a mixture of things that are not true combined with unwarrented prejudiced conclusions.
So you’re saying that youtube is basically propoganda??? Most of the ideos i went to presented facts.
Propaganda consists mostly of facts, but facts presented in a highly selective and deciptive way. I’ve seen so many videos about the attack on the Pentagon for example that don’t even mention the dozens of people who saw the plane crash into the building. Anyone watching the video would think that the person making it had searched high and low for evidence that a plane had crashed but couldn’t find it. The strangest thing is to read the statements of military people etc. repeating almost word for word the kind of things you can see on these videos and websites because they actually make the assumption that facts are being presented in an honest way.
The people whom are the one whom made factious claims about events are those whom only witnessed from afar then stated your opinion as fact.
911truther’s made up historical fiction and attempted to rewrite history that does not support their fictional cover memories for the catastrophic event and they sold books and lectures that were works of elaborate fictional conspiracies
that kept your flock entertaining the delusions you seed.
Just another idiot troll trying to help perpetrate the official story which is total hogwash. Get a life, already!!
great site u have soem people are so naroown minded that if u show them evidence they get defencive to view this u have to have open mind
THIS GOES AGAINST EVERYTHING IN MASS MEDIA
so it challenges your morals and beliefs
The evidence prooves that pentagon was hit by missile, twin towers were hit with plane but explosives seen in video make building collapse
The truth is in the video footage
WATCH LOOSE CHANGE 2
no,it really does not all the evidence supports the official story, that flight 77 hit the pentagon and the towers collapsed from structural failure, here, do the research for yourself, www.jod911.com or 911myths.com, sorry but all of the loose change movies are lies, and distortions, check out mark roberts loose change viewers guide.
Mr wright.
I think you have to concede all the evidence is against you. your aticulate but somewhat laboured returns are lacking in substance. your consistency in your replies suggests you are paid to come on here.
LISTEN to these people . listen to stig , rebecca …
ther was No wreakage at the pentagon. i defy you to put it up on youtube- (along with the confiscated footage form gas stations etc.). if you know any different
and regarding the war in the middle east, you must be aware its in US intersts to prolong it , not win it.
JP
sure, no problem go see it for yourself, 911myths.com/pentagon, all the debris you want.
No video of a plane hitting the pentagon, no airliner debris and no damage consistent with an airliner crashing into it…….
Who is trying to rewrite history???
(Damn trolls!)
To JP
I presume by consistancy you mean I’ve posted quite a few times on this page , which is obviously true -I don’t think there is some kind of limit – you are also free to post as many times as you like- and I only wish I was being paid for it ,I’d be doing it a lot more often. Did it ever occur to you that the Alex Jones, Jim Fetzers, Webster Tarpleys, et al. are making money from their books and videos? I don’t dismiss their views on the grounds that they make money from them but on the grounds that they don’t make sense and are misleading perople like you and Rebecca and Stig into believing them too. The statement ‘there was no wreakage at the Pentagon’ – do you really seriously believe that? If the 911 Report had said a plane did not crash into the Pentagon do you think you could come up with a case that showed they were lying?- not anything new , just from the stuff you have already seen, starting with the scores of eyewitnesses who saw the 757 crash into the side of the building. You could also come up with plenty of evidence of wreakage. In other words would you assess the evidence differently , because this is what it is all about, the assesment of evidence – so many people seem to have lost the ability to do it.
View Comment
Hello all,
Something to help you see the truth about 9/11 is the financial gain that a few select received due to insurance and put options. Search google for put options with 9/11 and find this info. The evidence is overwhelming supporting conspiracy theory. A little research and you will see 9/11 was to get the public to all other planned events. Patriot Act, etc. The good thing is that no matter what the elite can not hinder me from having eternal life with the father. Who can explain build 7 that does not agree with the conspiracy idea?
If people search on Google ,how many sites do you find that are not trying to tell you that it was an ‘inside job’? I think the problem is doing a little research.If you only do a little research you will find all these people with the conspiracy agenda. There are very few that take a more objective look at it. Try this site www.911myths.com. You don’t have to accept anything they say but it might make you think a bit more about it and surely that can’t be a bad thing.
Since the mid 1960’s there have been over 500 succesful commercial airline hijackings. In fact, once the planes are airborne 100% of the attempts were succesful ( a few were stopped on the ground).
Quite a few were carried out with knives or nothing more than an empty bag claiming a bomb was inside.
Considering the track record for hijackings, how hard is it to believe what happened to the aircraft on 9/11 ? A group of cub scouts could get to the flight deck…