The world trade center destruction was caught live on TV for millions to see, yet the conspiracy theorists even go as far to say that this was faked in one way or another.
The most common ‘evidence’ brought forward for foul play is the uniform destruction of the WTC Twin Towers, the pancaking effect. Where the Twin Towers collapse was uniformly flat down. Some conspiracy theorists think this is evidence for a controlled destruction, where much the same technique is used with controlled explosions. This picture shown below is used to prove the existence of explosives:
Yet this can be easily explained.
All skyscrapers are built with an engineering auto destruct sequence in them, so if anything serious happened to the building, it wouldn’t take out half of New York when it fell over. This pancaking effect is built into the building.
4 responses to WTC Destruction or Demolition? 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
What a nonsensical assertion. Simply examine what nearly 1000 licensed architects and structural engineers have to say about the collapse of WTC buildings 1, 2, and 7. They are correct. The ‘writer’ above … is clearly in la la land.
ae911truth.org (architects and engineers for 911 truth)
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
4 
3 (+1)
what the hell is in the circle
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
0 (+1)
Eric,
It is called a squib. It is an explosion that is very characteristic of controlled demolition. You can see them going all the way down the buildings. I believed the “official” story for 8 years until I saw a documentary on 9/11(Loose Change). I have done a lot of research since then and all the evidence points to an inside job. It is a really tough thing to have to contemplate about your country. I really wish I could find some evidence supporting the official story but there isn’t any. The FBI didn’t even wantBin Laden for 9/11. When asked why they said they had no hard evidence connecting him to the crime. You should watch “Zero- an investigation into 9/11″ and “The New American Century”". They are both good and relatively current.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
1 (0)
WTC Destruction or Demolition? 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
history repeats itself
Not many folk seem to get this one fact: There is another event in fairly recent history of the U.S. being brought into a war it did not want to fight. Before 911, there weren’t too many Americans around that would support going to war with Iraq. The international banking community (the ones that really run the world) needed to get the currency and banking in Iraq under their control. There are actually few places on the globe that are not under the control of the international bankers.
Iraq (my guess) would have accounted for a large amount of money and power not under their control. Now, Mr. Peabody, set the way back machine to the year 1941. WW2 was humming right along over in Europe, with Germany aligning herself with Italy and Japan. All three nations were not under the control of these same international bankers. The American people did not want to have any part in a war that did not involve them, as we had only 2 decades earlier been involved in WW1, a war that even most historians can’t really say how it started. Suddenly, early on a Sunday morning, when no one was watching (or so the story goes, anyway) Japan launched the bombing of Pearl Harbor. If a person does a little research, it’s fairly obvious that the event on December 7, 1941, was also a set up. Over night, America wanted to fight. The 2 events are uncannily done the same way.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
WTC Destruction or Demolition? 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Leave a reply to WTC Destruction or Demolition? 9/11 Conspiracy Theory