Comments on: John F. Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy Theories http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:19:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dereck http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html/comment-page-13#comment-28857 Dereck Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:19:11 +0000 http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html#comment-28857 Here is the problem with your conspiracy argument. If you are saying they didn't line up for their wounds to be caused by one shot, then were was the shooter that shot Connally shooting from? He couldn't have been an more towards the other building for the same reason you say a conspiracy exists. Kennedy would have ended up in the way and according to you that didn't happen. Obviously, there isn't another building up from the Schoolbook Depository for another shooter to be located. And even if there was, that would be at an angle that wouldn't allow for all of his wounds to exist. So I guess I am asking, what building did Connally's shooter shoot from. All you conspiracy theorists try to do is say why something couldn't happen but at no time can you come up with a plausible, or believeable explanation as to what could have happened. Your onw arguments lead to impossibilities like the one I mention here. Here is the problem with your conspiracy argument. If you are saying they didn’t line up for their wounds to be caused by one shot, then were was the shooter that shot Connally shooting from? He couldn’t have been an more towards the other building for the same reason you say a conspiracy exists. Kennedy would have ended up in the way and according to you that didn’t happen. Obviously, there isn’t another building up from the Schoolbook Depository for another shooter to be located. And even if there was, that would be at an angle that wouldn’t allow for all of his wounds to exist. So I guess I am asking, what building did Connally’s shooter shoot from. All you conspiracy theorists try to do is say why something couldn’t happen but at no time can you come up with a plausible, or believeable explanation as to what could have happened. Your onw arguments lead to impossibilities like the one I mention here.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

]]> By: George P http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html/comment-page-13#comment-28686 George P Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:21:06 +0000 http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html#comment-28686 Hersh's take is laid out in Chapter 19 of his book Bobby and J. Edgar. Hersh’s take is laid out in Chapter 19 of his book Bobby and J. Edgar.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

]]> By: pio http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html/comment-page-13#comment-28614 pio Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:42:07 +0000 http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html#comment-28614 i agree if one questions the official version of events they are called crazy kooks ,crazy kooks whos life is so worthless they need to believe in all these ridiculous theories . i admit a small amount of people have some weird and outlandish theories and this reflects badly on everyone else .theories aside when one simply looks at the evidence against oswald at close quarters they will see its full of holes and not nearly as iron clad as some would have you believe .this is evidenced when we see the likes of gerald posner (case closed )vincent bugliosi (reclaiming history ) and others like dave von pien etc etc having to twist /omit /distort and atleast in posner and bugliosis case downright lie ,why would these people feel the need to lie if as they say the case is iron clad . posner tells his readers that at about 11.45 the staff on the 6th floor who were laying a plywood floor (along with their supervisor bill shelly) went down to the 1st floor for lunch leaving oswald alone on the 6th floor. (so far posner is correct but this is where he forgets the truth and invents the lie ) he now says oswald alone stayed on the 6th floor he stayed up there and never went down for lunch and went about constructing the snipers nest and assembling his rifle where he then lay in wait for jfk .well then posner couldnt know that bill shelly saw oswald at 11.50 on the 1st floor ,and that charles given saw oswald on the 1st floor reading a paper ,and that eddie piper saw and spoke to oswald at midday again on the 1st floor ,how could posner who has researched for years not know the above ? the answer is he cant not know it therefore he chose to omit these 3 witnesses and lie . he denies a fourth witness carolyn arnold because her fbi statment says that when asked she said she did not see oswald ,again this is partly true arnold did say she didnt see oswald but she was talking about at 12.30 the time of the shots . theres a a reason why her statment says what it says the fbi agents in dallas were ordered to ask the witnesses a very specific question "did you see oswald at 12.30 the time of the shots" arnold was truthfull and said no she didnt but she had told the fbi that she saw oswald alone in the lunchroom at 12.15 or a little after . bugliosi tells his readers such things as "oswald claimed he ate with jarmin ,in the hope of getting an alibi " oswald said no such thing and bugliosi knows this .bugliosi had a choice he had a piece of innacurate testimony from will fritz and he had fritz and bookhouts interrogation notes which both contradict fritz testimony ,but what does he do he chose to use the inaccurate testimony . bugliosi tells his readers regarding the limo being cleaned at parklands "But on the face of it, it appears highly unlikely that the Secret Service would wash away the "crime scene" before the FBI criminalists could examine the car, and there is no testimony or statement from anyone that this was done." bugliosi having done 21 years of research must have missed the photo of a bucket of water by the limo /he must be unaware of atleast 3 journalists that witnessed and wrote about this and who photographed the bucket ,and he must be aware of the statment by the person who brought the bucket of water to clean the limo ,no he is not unaware of all this after 21 years research he chose to omit the information about the witnesses /the photo and instead chose to lie and say they wouldt do such a thing . so again i ask if the case against oswald was ironclad and people like me are crazy kooks why would the feel the need to omit /distort and lie ?. i agree if one questions the official version of events they are called crazy kooks ,crazy kooks whos life is so worthless they need to believe in all these ridiculous theories .

i admit a small amount of people have some weird and outlandish theories and this reflects badly on everyone else .theories aside when one simply looks at the evidence against oswald at close quarters they will see its full of holes and not nearly as iron clad as some would have you believe .this is evidenced when we see the likes of gerald posner (case closed )vincent bugliosi (reclaiming history ) and others like dave von pien etc etc having to twist /omit /distort and atleast in posner and bugliosis case downright lie ,why would these people feel the need to lie if as they say the case is iron clad .

posner tells his readers that at about 11.45 the staff on the 6th floor who were laying a plywood floor (along with their supervisor bill shelly) went down to the 1st floor for lunch leaving oswald alone on the 6th floor. (so far posner is correct but this is where he forgets the truth and invents the lie ) he now says oswald alone stayed on the 6th floor he stayed up there and never went down for lunch and went about constructing the snipers nest and assembling his rifle where he then lay in wait for jfk .well then posner couldnt know that bill shelly saw oswald at 11.50 on the 1st floor ,and that charles given saw oswald on the 1st floor reading a paper ,and that eddie piper saw and spoke to oswald at midday again on the 1st floor ,how could posner who has researched for years not know the above ? the answer is he cant not know it therefore he chose to omit these 3 witnesses and lie . he denies a fourth witness carolyn arnold because her fbi statment says that when asked she said she did not see oswald ,again this is partly true arnold did say she didnt see oswald but she was talking about at 12.30 the time of the shots . theres a a reason why her statment says what it says the fbi agents in dallas were ordered to ask the witnesses a very specific question “did you see oswald at 12.30 the time of the shots” arnold was truthfull and said no she didnt but she had told the fbi that she saw oswald alone in the lunchroom at 12.15 or a little after .

bugliosi tells his readers such things as “oswald claimed he ate with jarmin ,in the hope of getting an alibi ” oswald said no such thing and bugliosi knows this .bugliosi had a choice he had a piece of innacurate testimony from will fritz and he had fritz and bookhouts interrogation notes which both contradict fritz testimony ,but what does he do he chose to use the inaccurate testimony .

bugliosi tells his readers regarding the limo being cleaned at parklands “But on the face of it, it appears highly unlikely that the Secret Service would wash away the “crime scene” before the FBI criminalists could examine the car, and there is no testimony or statement from anyone that this was done.”
bugliosi having done 21 years of research must have missed the photo of a bucket of water by the limo /he must be unaware of atleast 3 journalists that witnessed and wrote about this and who photographed the bucket ,and he must be aware of the statment by the person who brought the bucket of water to clean the limo ,no he is not unaware of all this after 21 years research he chose to omit the information about the witnesses /the photo and instead chose to lie and say they wouldt do such a thing .

so again i ask if the case against oswald was ironclad and people like me are crazy kooks why would the feel the need to omit /distort and lie ?.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

]]> By: ddads http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html/comment-page-13#comment-28348 ddads Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:01:28 +0000 http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html#comment-28348 Interesting at the use of the words "conspiracy theory". Sounds like a psychological way to make everyone think that people who know that JFK and RFK were murdered are nut jobs. If you look up the words conspiracy and theory, then you understand what the real meaning is. Maybe it should just be called the murders of JFK and RFK, because in essence that's what it was. The terminology is used to make it sound like everyone is crazy. Pretty typical when it comes to disinformation. Interesting at the use of the words “conspiracy theory”. Sounds like a psychological way to make everyone think that people who know that JFK and RFK were murdered are nut jobs. If you look up the words conspiracy and theory, then you understand what the real meaning is. Maybe it should just be called the murders of JFK and RFK, because in essence that’s what it was. The terminology is used to make it sound like everyone is crazy. Pretty typical when it comes to disinformation.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0 (+3)

]]> By: Amnah Khan http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html/comment-page-13#comment-28314 Amnah Khan Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:02:21 +0000 http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html#comment-28314 Hi, I want to know what role did Robert F. Kennedy play as an Attorney General of the United States in case of assassination of JFK? Hi,

I want to know what role did Robert F. Kennedy play as an Attorney General of the United States in case of assassination of JFK?

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 (0)

]]> By: Leroy Blevins Sr http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html/comment-page-13#comment-28204 Leroy Blevins Sr Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:44:30 +0000 http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html#comment-28204 httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCmzXpVhbnY Need I say more

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCmzXpVhbnY


Need I say more

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 (+1)

]]> By: pio http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html/comment-page-13#comment-28138 pio Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:38:47 +0000 http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html#comment-28138 the problem with connally sitting 6 inches inboard of jfk is that its incorrect ,he was sat only about 3 inches inboard and slightly lower than jfk .dale myers incorrectly places connally 6 inches inboard in reallity it was about 3 inches (there are close up photos of the jump seat showing this) myers himself was forced to admit that,3 inches instead of 6 inches means connally cant be hit in the arm pit area but 3 inches left of that point . myers also shows jfks jacket collar all most at a level with the ears some thing which is patently untrue as there is plenty of film to show the collar was lower .the reason for elevating the collar is to try and decieve people and make them think jfk was shot in the neck when he was really shot in the upper back . that is easily checked jfks personal physician admiral burkley was present at the autopsy and documented that jfk was shot at t3 (the third thoracic vertebrae ) where myers has jfk being shot in the neck are the cervical vertebrae ,there are 7 cervical vertebrae and 12 thoracic . myers simulation have jfk being hit at about c5 but as we know from burkley he really was hit at t3 5 vertebrae lower ,myers is well versed on the evidence in this case so its unthinkable to say he must have made an error . jfk being hit at t3 also causes another problem for myers a trajectory problem ,the reason being that as jfk is hit at t3 the trajectory changes completely away from the 6th floor window as the bullet has to go in at less of a declination in order to exit just below jfks adams apple . another problem is that at the autopsy when jfks back wound was spotted the wound was probed first with a finger and then with a surgical probe and was found to be a shallow wound that had no exit (other witnesses verified that ) a shallow wound is where the bullet only travels a short distance into the wound and does not travel all the way through the flesh/bone and exit .that would better explain the near pristine condition of ce399 (the so called magic bullet ) if ce399 had only gone in a few inches into the back and then fell out at parklands during attempts to save jfk it would be reasonable to say its condition might then be consistant ,however it would then be ruled out as having injured connally and would mean a 4th shot that oswald could not have fired . the problem with connally sitting 6 inches inboard of jfk is that its incorrect ,he was sat only about 3 inches inboard and slightly lower than jfk .dale myers incorrectly places connally 6 inches inboard in reallity it was about 3 inches (there are close up photos of the jump seat showing this) myers himself was forced to admit that,3 inches instead of 6 inches means connally cant be hit in the arm pit area but 3 inches left of that point . myers also shows jfks jacket collar all most at a level with the ears some thing which is patently untrue as there is plenty of film to show the collar was lower .the reason for elevating the collar is to try and decieve people and make them think jfk was shot in the neck when he was really shot in the upper back .

that is easily checked jfks personal physician admiral burkley was present at the autopsy and documented that jfk was shot at t3 (the third thoracic vertebrae ) where myers has jfk being shot in the neck are the cervical vertebrae ,there are 7 cervical vertebrae and 12 thoracic . myers simulation have jfk being hit at about c5 but as we know from burkley he really was hit at t3 5 vertebrae lower ,myers is well versed on the evidence in this case so its unthinkable to say he must have made an error .

jfk being hit at t3 also causes another problem for myers a trajectory problem ,the reason being that as jfk is hit at t3 the trajectory changes completely away from the 6th floor window as the bullet has to go in at less of a declination in order to exit just below jfks adams apple .

another problem is that at the autopsy when jfks back wound was spotted the wound was probed first with a finger and then with a surgical probe and was found to be a shallow wound that had no exit (other witnesses verified that ) a shallow wound is where the bullet only travels a short distance into the wound and does not travel all the way through the flesh/bone and exit .that would better explain the near pristine condition of ce399 (the so called magic bullet ) if ce399 had only gone in a few inches into the back and then fell out at parklands during attempts to save jfk it would be reasonable to say its condition might then be consistant ,however it would then be ruled out as having injured connally and would mean a 4th shot that oswald could not have fired .

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1 (+2)

]]> By: the7thson http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html/comment-page-13#comment-28130 the7thson Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:05:39 +0000 http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html#comment-28130 The only problem with the "zigzagging bullet" hypothesis is that it assumes that JFK and Connolly were seated one behind the other and facing forward. The fact is that Connolly was sitting inboard of JFK and lower than him. The governor was also turned. When you take the relative positions of Kennedy's seat, the jump seat where the governor sat, and the angle from which Oswald fired, the bullet makes a very straight line...while still causing JFK's back wound, his exit wound in his throat, as well as all of Connolly's wounds. A straight line! The only problem with the “zigzagging bullet” hypothesis is that it assumes that JFK and Connolly were seated one behind the other and facing forward. The fact is that Connolly was sitting inboard of JFK and lower than him. The governor was also turned. When you take the relative positions of Kennedy’s seat, the jump seat where the governor sat, and the angle from which Oswald fired, the bullet makes a very straight line…while still causing JFK’s back wound, his exit wound in his throat, as well as all of Connolly’s wounds. A straight line!

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3 (-2)

]]> By: the7thson http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html/comment-page-13#comment-28129 the7thson Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:56:48 +0000 http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html#comment-28129 Um...Mightymex...every time I look at my watch, the back of my wrist is facing my chest. Um…Mightymex…every time I look at my watch, the back of my wrist is facing my chest.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0 (+3)

]]> By: Leroy Blevins Sr http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html/comment-page-13#comment-25751 Leroy Blevins Sr Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:17:37 +0000 http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/john-f-kennedy-assassination-conspiracy.html#comment-25751 A Question Who filmed the Zapruder film? The reason for this question is that when I gone over the Bronson photo I did not found Mr. Zapruder doing any filming or even seen Mr.Zapruder. However I did see Miss Sitzman with a camera in the location where Zapruder was filming and found she was the one that did the filming and not Mr.Zapruder. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UD1Em77vxQ Here is a video from my company that shows the location I found in the Bronson photo and it show only Miss Sitzman doing filming in this location and Mr.Zapruder is not found. This is one more thing I can show and prove. As it was told after Mr.Zapruder sold his film he gave the money to Miss Sitzman and the reason he gave her all the money off of his film is she was the one that did the filming and not Mr.Zapruder. A Question
Who filmed the Zapruder film?

The reason for this question is that when I gone over the Bronson photo I did not found Mr. Zapruder doing any filming or even seen Mr.Zapruder. However I did see Miss Sitzman with a camera in the location where Zapruder was filming and found she was the one that did the filming and not Mr.Zapruder.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UD1Em77vxQ


Here is a video from my company that shows the location I found in the Bronson photo and it show only Miss Sitzman doing filming in this location and Mr.Zapruder is not found. This is one more thing I can show and prove. As it was told after Mr.Zapruder sold his film he gave the money to Miss Sitzman and the reason he gave her all the money off of his film is she was the one that did the filming and not Mr.Zapruder.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1 (+3)

]]>