Comments on: Common Purpose Conspiracy Theory

By: ToooTrooo

ToooTrooo — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 04:49:46 +0000

My Childs. History is nothing but a chronicle of events that were once considered “conspiracy theories” until they became bloodied conspiracy facts. This phobia about conspiracy theory in general has been spawned by Satan to prevent all and every scrutiny into his machinations. Whatever happened to commoner garden old SUSPICION? Doesn’t have that ole jingle-jangle “conspiracy theory’ bell ring to it. We suspect Common Purpose is up to no good because Common Sense tells us that where there is money involved there is invariably skullduggery. As flies to shit are Satan’s little helpers to the smell of money. Thank God for conspiracy theorists, be they right or wrong, or we could all end up like hounded and massacred Jews of the last world world. Had they not been “paranoid” or suffering from “conspiracy theory” they would have been okay. Right? Over to you Satan.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 3 0 (+3)

By: Keith

Keith — Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:06:13 +0000

Is a “self-sustaining network” being selected and invested in by those currently in power a bunch of people conspiring together? Is a bunch of people openly conspiring together a conspiracy fact, or is it only a theory?
How do they all sustain each other if they don’t conspire together?

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 4 1 (+3)

By: Keith

Keith — Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:11 +0000

Aren’t we supposed to elect the future politicians? So how does the current government know who we will elect in the future?

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 4 2 (+2)

By: Keith

Keith — Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:50:59 +0000

What has happened over the past 20 years is Common Purpose training the leaders in every part of society, and choosing and installing the new leaders. You can go to the government website to read about how David Cameron (through Common Purpose) launched the “UK-India Future Leaders” scheme, investing in the “self-sustaining network” of future leaders in all parts of society. What right have those currently in power to tell us who our future leaders will be, and use our money to train those selected by them?

If Common Purpose were doing a good job selecting and training these leaders in every part of society, surely we should be seeing society improve -- eg. the hospitals, police force, schools, etc. should be doing a better and better job as this wonderful organisation teaches those in charge of everything to improve society, with this improvement growing as their graduates increase and get more and more power.

Is this what is happening, or have things begun to fall apart more and more since Common Purpose started interfering and growing?

Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think? 13 0 (+13)

By: Porcellio Scaber

Porcellio Scaber — Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:24:29 +0000

I’ve put a tick against all ten boxes (so to speak) in the summary list of what’s wrong with the country.

I’m aware that “post hoc ergo propter hoc” is a logical fallacy, so the mere fact that all these things are established facts in contemporary Britain doesn’t in itself argue for Common Purpose involvement.

Still, they do appear to be a nasty organisation, with an explicit policy of secrecy (i.e. unminuted meetings under the Chatham House Rule) and a sinister stated aim of “leading beyond authority”.

If -- as is not inconceivable -- they are (wholly or partly) behind our ten-point checklist of social evils, then they have succeeded brilliantly in achieving the programme attributed to them by their critics.

Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think? 9 1 (+8)

By: Markoff

Markoff — Fri, 22 Apr 2011 20:12:14 +0000

“…the Patriarchy has been dying for centuries!”

I would say earlier. Perhaps the message of Christ’s appearance on Earth?

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 2 1 (+1)

By: Machiavelli's Mum

Machiavelli's Mum — Mon, 21 Mar 2011 01:00:45 +0000

Everyone here is right.

“The LOLocalypse” -- haha! I’m stealing that!

Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think? 6 5 (+1)

By: Eric Trist

Eric Trist — Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:12:34 +0000

Thesis -- New World Order (dissemination of information on NWO including death camps, brain chips, Limits to Growth, alien invasion/Project BlueBeam-Greenstar, comets, Nibiru, etc.)

Effect: people frightened to high level of suggestibility.

Antithesis -- Anti-New World Order (dissemination of information on NWO including death camps, brain chips, Limits to Growth, alien invasion/Project BlueBeam-Greenstar, comets, Nibiru, etc.)

Effect: people frightened to high level of suggestibility

Intended Synthesis -- Fascistic Communitarian New World Order -- the Patriarchy has been dying for centuries! -- the elite knows this (people previously frightened to high level of suggestibility will run lovingly into arms of New World Communitarian Order -- Mother State.)

Effect: Social Turbulence. People comforted. Power elite retain their dominance over human race via Networked Societies a la CP (“… a thousand points of light… “)

Then “The Culling” begins.

You have been played.

Missing variable: Transcedent nature of the human being. The elite will fail as the veil slips.

Everybody wakes up and realises how stupid they are/were.

The Killing Joke in this Divine Comedy.

The LOLocalypse. The End.

Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think? 21 2 (+19)

By: Keith Thompson

Keith Thompson — Sat, 05 Feb 2011 04:54:51 +0000

If people are plainly stating that they ARE INDEED conspiring together then it is not a “conspiracy theory”, it is a FACT!

Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think? 15 3 (+12)

By: Keith Thompson

Keith Thompson — Sat, 05 Feb 2011 04:28:37 +0000

I bet Common Purpose graduates are the ones posting the comments here about the nonsense of this idea and calling it a “conspiracy theory” and all that. Just go to their website and you plainly see that they are an organised group that plainly state that they are an elitist group of leaders and future leaders in every part of society whose aim is to collaborate together to control entire cities, interfere in other people’s business where they are not supposed to, pretend they have authority which they know they do not have and help each other gain extra power and influence. They also plainly state they must abide by the Chatham House rule of secrecy. This is most definitely NOT a harmless charity!

Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think? 24 1 (+23)