Comments on: Apollo Moon Landing Hoax

By: Moon Hoax Retards

Moon Hoax Retards — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:55:19 +0000

This comment is for those with a good grip on reality but are puzzled with some of the Moonhoaxtards claims.

Myth Busters did an excellent set of episodes explaining the strange behavior of the flags, the light anomalies, and a few others.
I admit, I was intrigued by the hoax claims at first.
But when I watched Myth Busters, it made perfect sense.

I have no interest in trying to convert the die hard moon hoaxers.
You can’t fix stupid.
Nor do I wish to get into a completely pointless debate with morons.
This comment is solely for the people sitting on the fence with regards to the debate.

Do a search on Youtube for Myth Busters moon landing hoax.

I’m sure this comment will get lots of nasty replies.
That’s why I have no intention of coming back to this comment section.
So Moonhoaxtards, fire away.
Maybe even pretend your computer monitor is my head and punch it in.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 1 1 (0)

By: Joe

Joe — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:13:30 +0000

Proof:
If we can launch shuttles, sattelites, and intercontinental missles out of Geosynchronous orbit (these things have been clearly proved by unrefuted data). Also, we can clearly launch humans into space. Proved by hundreds if not thousands of unrefutable missions. Then, what is two stop us from going to the moon? The answer is very little. Once we are past this point the shuttle can basically cruze on to the moon with little gravity resistance and little to know molecular resistance due to their rareified state. All that is needed now is a navigational system and too be able to keep going straight. The first has been proved effective by use of earth based tracking system and space based ones on non-human missions. As for going straight all that is needed is a gyroscope. Now to legitimately land on the moon the technology is very low tech for NASA. All that is required is a small ship with the poower to get from the craft to the moon and back. This technology is about the simplest thing imaginable. To refute the possiblity would be insanity. Then they just need to power back to earth, which is again easy due to lack of gravity and rarefied molecules. Finally, they simply need to reenter earths atmoshpere. For this a simple shielding layer can be used. This final piece has been proved time and time again.
All the steps apart are simple, logical, and proved possible.

I realize this isn’t an exact description, but I was trying to simplify it. For a more accurate and complete description visit nasa.gov/

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 1 4 (-3)

By: Joe

Joe — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:50:34 +0000

Proof enough to me is that at the time the moon landing happened the technology for a moon landing existed.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 1 2 (-1)

By: Joe

Joe — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:48:40 +0000

Yes, Tyler most scientists in the world believe that the moon was a chunk of earth blown off by an asteroid impact while the planet was forming. This is due to the similarities between the chemical compsition that makes up both planets. It is a perfectly plausible theory.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: Me

Me — Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:56:13 +0000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdb8wUf_yZo

this video is a piece of history!!

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: MythBusted

MythBusted — Sat, 17 Sep 2011 20:55:13 +0000

Myth Busters…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mefEKqzq8cg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=RfKItI-cHPM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwp&v=NOv_zvM-oJQ&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCNV1hiKpLI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=0dTATMEJSuQ

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: Mike

Mike — Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:08:54 +0000

Take a good look at that cardboard contraption they landed on the moon with. A lowly county building inspector wouldn’t pass that thing. Quite the joke.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 4 (-4)

By: Mike

Mike — Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:06:48 +0000

No more expensive then the trillions of dollars the gov’t keep throwing around. They lost a couple of trillion at the Pentagon. Must have given the false state of iraelie a trillion by now. Who cares? Just print up some more counterfeit federal reserve notes. Make the great, great, great, grand kids pay for it.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 5 (-5)

By: Mike

Mike — Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:00:43 +0000

Just about everything taught by government schools is false. If gov’t could tell the truth and win, they would lie about it.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 2 (-2)

By: James Getman

James Getman — Sun, 11 Sep 2011 07:57:58 +0000

Show Me The Rocks In Person! Why Are They Not On Display! Why Don’t We See Quality Video and Still Shots From The Moon? Not What Was Shown On Tv? Where Is The Proof! (Next Thing You Will Tell Me Is That The United States Goverment Is For The People And By The People!) Iraq Was Not About Oil! And The Goverment Is Not Controled By The Rich for there well Being! And YoU will Probably say That Corporate America Wants Small Business To Prosper! Go Ahead American Have Been Dumbed down, they will believe anything the media tells them! Who Controls The Media? AH…..!!!!!!! Grow Up Dummy!

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 3 (-3)