In 1959 Bill Kaysing predicted that at that time, the chances of getting a man to the moon and back alive were 0.0014%, taking into account radiation and micro meteors.
Just 2 years later US president J. F. Kennedy made his famous speech.
“I believe that this nation should commit itself. To achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind or more important for the long range exploration of Space.”
Eight years later in on the 16th of July 1969, Apollo 11 was launched on a mission to the moon and back, carrying three people. On the 20th of July Apollo 11 landed on the moon. Neil Armstrong stepped out of the Lunar Module (LM) in front of a watching world, climbed down the ladder and said those famous words.
“One small step for man one giant leap for mankind”
And in doing so, Neil Armstrong won the moon race against Russia for America, and proved to an entire world that the sky isn’t the only limit.
Or so NASA said!
Ever since 1969, a small but loud crowd of people have doubted that America did send a man to the moon, and the Apollo Hoax was born.
There are three basic kinds of arguments for this hoax: Photographic, video, and scientific. See the links below for moon landing hoax research and discussions.
See our Apollo Moon Landing Forum.
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Camera Problems
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Video Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?
105 responses to Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
All of you Moon landing “skeptics” have clearly devoted hours and hours of time poring over the conspiracy angle. How much time have you actually devoted to researching the Apollo program or, good gravy, familiarizing yourselves with basic physical science principles? If you would simply spend half as much time learning something useful about the space program rather than accepting, without ctitical analysis or technical knowledge, the absurd claims my by hoax enthusiasts, you’d be able to answer your own preposterous questions.
And to clarify a peculiar attitude advanced by a number of you, the burden of proof IS on YOU. YOU are challenging the historical record, so YOU have to make YOUR case. Since you can’t come up with a challenge that cannot be easily addressed by applying the most fundamental scientific analysis, you have no proof of a hoax and you never will.
Here’s the thing. The Soviets were the best at working conspiracies. Why didn’t they fake a landing before we did? If I follow your reasoning, there really was no Cold War and the USSR was in cahoots with the USA to expose the shortcomings of soviet communism! That’s why the Soviets didn’t rat us out. Yeah. That must be it.
The security around Apollo Program was nothing like what went on during the Manhattan Project. Just go to the library and look at how many news articles from the early- and mid-1960s follow the progress of the project. Oh, wait. All of the nation’s newspapers and their employees were in on the conspiracy, too.
In fact, to pull off this hoax, every citizen of Earth, except American taxpayers, was in on it.
Can you see why this whole conspiracy angle just doesn’t make it? Science, common sense and rational thinking simply undercut the entire premise. Let it go.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
0 (+1)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
please note that I’m not asking anyone to shut their mouths.. I’m suggesting that it is possible that men with integrity can be silenced. You threaten their familys or their friends, you can buy their silence, or force it. I won’t attack the integrety of anyone in this matter since I don’t know who is a willing participant and who isn’t. I feel that the ground crews and the mission control personelle had no Idea any of it was faked. They would be easy to fool and also the most compelling witnesses attesting that it all was real and it happened. There are people that had full knowledge of what happened and are filthy dirty in the creation of the lie.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
has anyone ever wondered why on the film of the moon buggy the dust from the wheels does not stay in the air longer given that the gravity is a lot less on the moon?
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
You’re almost on the right track with the moon buggy dust. Since there is no atmosphere, there is no air to support the dust, and it will fall to the surface without any frictional resistance from the air. That is why it does not stay aloft. The question that can’t be answered is why is it just being tossed up as far as dust with normal earth gravity. It would fall quickly, but it should be tossed much further above the surface before it descends. By the same tolken as the first explanation, there is no frictional resistance from air to stop it from ascending, and there is reduced gravitational pull to stop its ascent as well. That buggy should be throwing a big rooster of cloudless debris.
Terry, my research into the lunar hoax is because there were so many questions I had about how it possibly could have been done. I grew up believing we went there. I studied it and researched it… but there were a lot of things that didn’t make sense as I got older and learned more about radio telemetry and radiation and physics and aerospace technology. Most of my questions were already being asked by others as I searched for information. As for your Russia cold war stuff, Of course there was a cold war. Of course Russia wanted to beat us to the moon. They were decades away from doing it. When we pulled it out of our hat coming from behind it blew them away. The evidence was extremely convincing and not all of the information available to us today was available then. If we could trick U.S. aeronautical engineers that worked on the program, how hard do you think it was to trick Soviets that had nothing but low res pictures to go on? We weren’t so technologically advanced that no one would be able to follow in our footsteps. We weren’t so technologically advanced that we won’t be able to repeat our amazing feat for another 20 years from now. You never will be able to look past what was spoon fed to you, but others will. Fortunately some good can come from your post.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
0 (+1)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
To the person who said that the Russians would have told the Press about the Americans faking the moon landing. Which press would these Russians tell? Any reporter here in the U.S. who 1) valued their job 2) valued their life would not have ran a story like that. Orders from the White House would have surely at least had this reporter fired if not murdered. So tell me how would any Americans in the 60s read anything about Russians screaming about a hoax? No newspapers, no TV channels, no news channels would have ran a story like that if they wanted to live to see another day. What do you think the FBI and CIA are really for? Well, that’s part of there job. Got to keep track of the US Citizens and what they know.
Only reason why anyone is talking about 9/11 as a conspiracy is because of the internet. In 1960, no one would hear of these theories because no reporter would dare write anything like that,
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
i have to say i want to believe but the evidence is overwhelming against us going. I have seen many, many videos including one where an astronaut was saluting the flag and it was waving but then stopped. A minute goes by and he walks past the flag with about a couple of feet in between him and the flag and when he passes by it, the flag (primarily the bottom corner begins to wave. Since there is no atmosphere on the moon this action is impossible, unless he was on earth. I did not come to the conclusion of this by watching one video, this has been over and over and over of research. Its is obvious they were using a wire system to by the way they moved and on one video it appeared they were using a trmapoline to jump, which was out of view but if you look at them they appear to go higher and higher. I could go on and on and I will say this. Did anyone think that 30-50 years later people would ever question this? The thinking back then was different
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Lets see in 1969 everyone was TOLD this happened, and reinforced it with newspapers, tv, and word of mouth. In 69 everyone feared Russia thanks to the same model of information pushers. In 69 everyone had no other source to gather the info for them selves, They just swallowed the Kool-aid they were given becasuse they trusted the kool-aid producers.
OF course they dont believe in the Hoax theorys, just like the church pushes their innocense through mass they dont doubt there is a god.
If you are told that the stove is hot and you dont believe your teacher of that fact you touch the stove and you get burned. But if you trust the teacher you accept it and continue to accept it and never doubt you teacher again. Well in the case of the moon landing they still trust their teachers. So its no wonder they all can’t believe it could be fake. They have swallowed the Kool-aid and keep swallowing it because they, like any good church going fool, have no basis or will power to think outside the box.
These believers of god and moon landings are made up of people so stupid, fearful, who have no ambition of their own, who can’t think for themselves, they would rather trust at face value things people with more power than them feed them as long as they are silent. Talk about a sad existance of a lifeform. And they are breeding. Yikes!
“My daddy told me they landed on the moon so I believe them, why would they lie to me”,
“Daddy is it true did they go to the moon?”
“Yes sondaughter they did”
And so they never question it, now that’s just plain ignorant.
Money is the ultimate tool to contol the masses, those with it make the stories, and those without it live by the rules of those who have it. Plain and simple. Religion and money go hand in hand, the church pays no taxes but all others do. So if you pay no taxes you have more money than those who do. Duh! Money and Fear are the Conspirsies (sp) and they have you by the balls. These is the true crimes of humanity and I am amazed that nobody else sees this, yet at the same time I am not amazed that nobody sees this becasue when they own the informaition they can bend it all they want.
Time has come with the age of technology and the Internet to finally overthrow these losers and bring them to justice via the Gallows pole. Their little ruse has been exposed and they will either be fleeing from the masses or they will be swinging in the wind. So put down the Kool-aid or become a statistic in which you may or may not deserve.
Man on the moon in 69 lol ha ha what a friggn joke.
“I’ve been around the world and found only stupid people are breeding” ….
When Japan or China brings back the first evidance of no lunar landings you’ll see and then you will have to rethink everything and the lies of your upbringing will send you into thearpy and then you’ll change your tune about what you believe.
The only positive side to this whole thing is that the young female offspring of those who were children back then are easy targets for predators. Its easy to steal a blind mans soup. And even easier to steal the virginity the daughters of those peoples’ daughters who believe people went to the moon… ha ha ha lol… Nothing like free sex.
Wake up or shut up.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
The one problem with the lunar hoax is that there is not a single scientist, or aerospace engineer who supports it. To them, you idiots are a joke, like fundamentalists who ignore every bit of science that disagrees with their literal interpretation of the bible. All that your theories prove is your complete lack of basic scientific knowledge. Ultimately this makes debunkings pointless since you lack the basic knowledge to understand them and will simply accuse the person of being a NASA stooge.
One person mentioned the possibility of the government using threats against the media to keep them silent. The problem with this is that our president during the moon landings was Nixon, one of our more amoral commander in chiefs, and even he could not keep the watergate conspiracy silent. That conspiracy, was much smaller than what would be required for the moon landing. Also, what about media outside the United States and even in the USSR, are we supposed to believe that the government threatened them as well.
If you really are as open-minded as you claim you can find a detailed debunking by an aerospace engineer at .
Oh, and as a fan of James Bond, I should probably mention that the book Diamonds are Forever does not mention anything about the moon or a moon buggy at all.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
1 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
You are all stupid conspiracy-theorists. What, do you think there isn’t any light on the moon or something? Hello? Ever heard of a little thing called the SUN that lights up the earth so wthat we can live? Duh! The light from the earth would be enough to shine on the moon a little, and that’s why we can see it so clearly at night! Plus there’s flash on both video and photo cameras! That would definetly be enough to light up an astronaut! You can see that the person who took the picture of the astronaut on the moon was totally on a surface unlike that of a movie studio. And don’t you think that there were eyewitnesses who SAW APOLLO 11 TAKE OFF? NASA would not be dumb enough not to have them there so someone could prove they landed on the moon!
By saying that Apollo 11 is a hoax, then you’re disgracing our country. Go crawl under a rock, American-haters. You can shove this stupid theory up your snooty a**.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
2 (-1)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Nice… no one said the appolo rocket didn’t launch. There was plenty of light to take pictures with. There was however, no flash photography, we didn’t have the ability to automate a light sensor with a aperature control to automatically adjust for flash fill on the moon in 1969… but we had the ability to send people to the moon? The moon isn’t lit at night by reflected light from the earth genius… its lit by light shining directly on the lunar surface from the sun… as the earth passes between the moon and the sun, it creates the lunar cycle.. (half, full, crescent, etc..) before you jump into a conversation waving your american flag, educate yourself. Your a prime example of the ignorance that runs our country.
It was Vice president Lyndon Johnson, tasked with researching the viability of a lunar landing, who informed Kenedy that we would be able to orbit men around the moon with a possible team landing on the surface back in 1961. He was given this task in order to find a campaign that would bolster American confidence immediately following the “Bay of Pigs” incident, and the russians successfull orbit of a man around the earth. When he took office after Kenedy’s assasination, it was under Lyndon Johnsons Presidency that the lunar missions development progressed, and it was his credibility on the line. It was in his last year of office in July 1969 when apollo 11 touched down. Were this whole thing a Hoax, it would have been dropped in Nixon’s lap like a hand grenade. Is it any wonder that Nixon scrubbed the last 4 scheduled lunar missions and declared that we would not be returning to the moon anytime in the forseeable future?
These reputable scientists that you speak of, are they the same ones that are scrambling to develop a vehicle to get us to the moon right now? Are they the same ones that developed the failure of a space shuttle program? (8 missions per year v.s. the intended 25-60 missions per year)
There isn’t question that we had the technology to send an unmanned craft to orbit the moon in 1969, but to send human cargo, and to return them, let alone land them and drive around in a moon buggy is rediculous.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
2 
0 (+2)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
this hoax thing can be settled easy,i hope bart sibrel reads this,for the last while theres been detailed pictures from the surface of the moon from JAXA/NHK,also cappable of collecting moon samples,i know what you think im gonna ask,no forget about finding lunor landings,when u have the DNA of a hoax,compareJAXAs moon samples to samples taken from apollo 11and beleave me NASAs gonna be looking at this very carefully,no match,CASE CLOSED,if we went to the moon in 69,by now they whould have space stations built there,and the rich could get return trips there and back,only machines can pass the van allen belt not flesh and bone
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
APOLLO 11 moon samples=new moon samples from JAXA/NHK….DNA proof no match ,,i whould bet my life on it
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
guess my DNA theary is dead,now that i learned the NASA will send a sponsored intrument called the MOON MINERALOGY MAPPER will ride along side JAXA,and will use a infrared spectrome to survey the lunar terrain,,,,,,,HMMMMMMM why do they need to ride along …….TO COVER THERE TRACKS
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
ok i got a way to figure it out ,and theres nothing NASA can do to cover up this 1, next ship they send to the moon ,have a device that measures the radiation threw the van allen belts,if its at a level were no living thing can pass threw it,CASE CLOSED,and theres nothing NASA can do about it
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
The radiation levels in the Van Allen belts has been measured many times with many different methods and devices, the information is freely available.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
I also was of the opinion that the lunar landings were faked and that man never went to the moon. The number of problems and inconsistencies is quite staggering as well as the number of “accidents” involving astronauts in the earlier part of the Apollo space program. Well, now an even uglier conspiracy faces me in that I believe that the lunar missions were real but the truth of what technology was used and for what purpose a mission to the moon was chosen. There were 6 manned missions with lunar landings to the moon in a period of 3 years (Jul’69 – Dec’72). Thereafter no missions were ever undertaken. Why would NASA create doubt that they ever went to the moon by purposely distorting and fabricating some of the lunar evidence to muddle the waters?
My reasons for believing the moon landings took place. I believe there is a fountain of knowledge regarding electrogravitics, and “free energy” and other science that have been deliberately suppressed for decades at least. No conventional technology would have been able to keep human beings safe from the Van Allen belt radiation; so only 2 options exists to explain the lunar missions. (1) They were faked (2) NASA utilized technology like electrogravitics. As I said, if they have deliberately faked evidence to cast doubt on the authenticity of the lunar landings then reality is even more twisted than them actually faking the lunar landings. Because then the question is why would they want to hide the real scope and depth of what happened/what were discovered on the moon? I am not even excluding that only one mission could have taken place and that the rest or some were faked. Also the Apollo program cost *1*$20,443,600,000. I think we urgently need to get to the moon and find out what really is going on, this need no be an international effort though…
*1* http://www.fi.edu/pieces/schutte/landchart.html
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
The russians were years ahead of us in the space race. They were already developing a craft to take a single man to the moon. If you look at their design, it was much more credible, but they still couldn’t get the mass of the craft small enough to fly a single man and equipment to the moon. This was to be done with two launches, one for the manned module that would go to the moon and return. The other for the additional fuel and equipment that would be necessary for the trip. They weren’t taking a lunar rover, or enough food, water, and air to sustain 3 astronauts. Yet they had to face the reality that using their current technology the trip was impossible. They spent 14 years trying to achive this goal before canceling the program. Their aerospace technology at the start of the program was just ahead of the U.S. technology, and after 14 years it was far beyond the point where the U.S. finished its first manned lunar craft and put it on the moon. Yet the Russians after 14 years realized that it could not be physically done. That is something that with todays current nanotechnology and microcomputers we are able to consider doing, but even with that, the projection for a manned lunar round trip isn’t for 15 more years.
The reason that the remainder of the U.S. missions were scrubbed and the program cancelled was because it was taking a huge ammount of resources to pull off a fake lunar walk and technology was getting to the point where people were starting to question the validity of the photos and video.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
0 (+1)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Baratacus said, as the earth passes between the moon and the sun, it creates the lunar cycle.. (half, full, crescent, etc..)
That is wrong. This is refering to a lunar eclipse. The only time the Earth shadow comes to play on the cycles of the moon is during a lunar eclipse.
Othewise the cycles of the moon are merely the aspect angle of the sun shining on the moon as we see it from the earth. Fact.
No one has suggested that we didn’t send our astronauts into space. The launch happened as witnessed by thousands. So did the splash downs. As witnessed by hundreds. The suggestion was that we never left the earth’s orbit passing through and outside of the protection of the Van Allen radiation belts.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
0 (+1)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
sorry mikeometer, I wasn’t very clear about that. As the earth passes directly between the moon and the sun we see a full moon, as the moon passes between the sun and the earth we see a new moon (no moon) since the dark side is facing us. I didn’t mean to imply that the phases of the moon were caused by the shadow of the earth on the lunar surface, but it does sound like that’s what I’m saying though.
Instead of saying, ” as the earth passes between the moon and the sun, it creates the lunar cycle..”
I should have said, “as the earth passes from between the moon and the sun to behind the moon, our view of the illuminated area of the moon changes causing the lunar cycle.
Thanks for the clarification
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
0 (+1)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Put aside the notion that the Moon landings were deception. Work on the idea that the Moon photographs were faked. Then research “2001: A Space Odyssey”. Stanley Kulbrick finishing filming in UK shortly before the Moon landings. And he got to use that special NASA lens for filming “Barry Lyndon”. Then say to yourself: “My government wouldn’t do anything that deceitful.” Hard to keep a straight face, right? US governments have a history of criminality, and they have become bolder over the years. Just needs one crack in the dam.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
2 
0 (+2)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
i am afraid that i can prove all of the “hoax” theories wrong, sorry to dissapoint.
lets start from the begining.(btw im taking time out of my homework on the moon landing to wright this so listen up)
if armstrong was first on the moon, who took the photo?-simple, the camera was on a simple tripod ‘arm’ that extended out from the side of the rocket.
why does the flag move if thier is no wind?- because they had to jam the pole into the earth(which moved the flag), and with no friction to stop it, the flag continued to sway afterwards, and then became stationary again
why are there no stars in the photo?- because to take a photo of whattever they were taking a photo of, they had to use the right exposure, with the sun shining this would of been very hard to see in the photos(btw NASA has some of the greatest minds in the world, do you really think they would forget the stars if they wanted to fake it?seriously people…)
why is there a ‘c’ on a rock in one of the photos- in the origonal there is no ‘c’, this is just a tiny hair that was in the way during the copying process
why is there the same background?- with no atmosphere it is hard to gage distance, it could be 10 or 100 miles away and you wouldnt see the difference
why did was there shadows in more than one direction if the only light source was the sun?-the surface of the moon is very reflective, scattering light in different directions,casting different shadows
why was there footprints if the sand if it was not wet?- barcarbonate of soda is not wet, yes? sprinkle some on your kitchen floor and tread on it it leaves a footprint, yes? i rest my case.
why was there dust on the lander if there was no wind to blow it on it- because with no atmosphere the dust goes straight up and back down again, when the lander landed it blew dust up, it came straight back down on the lander.
theres loads more but i seriously have to get back to that homework. still not convinced? visit http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/index.html
if your still not satisfied then you are a pesimist who cant admit thier wrong about one of the greatest achievments in man kind and i think you need to readjust your perspective on life.
p.s if your someone who i just mentioned than i hope you new the answers behind the hoax theries but wont believe because otherwise you are dumber than a 13 year old [yes, i may be only 13 but at least i dont spend my free time making up conspiracy theries to do with nasa] also, TEST your theries before you make a judgement, it saves a lot of insult to those who gave thier lives work to the apollo missions.
thx for listening
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
2 (-1)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
The Alternative
Fly me to the moon- or not
If it took rockets full of fuel to get the lunar module into space- outside of the earth’s gravity- and on its way to the moon- what kept it propelled in space after it was just the lunar module on its way to the moon? By what mechanism was used to steer the lunar module so that it would be able to land on the moon? When they landed on the moon- we can assume they didn’t crash. So how did they wind up on the moon’s surface? When they landed- did they crash land- or just stop in mid-air and slowly lower the lunar module to the earth’s surface? When they left the moon- how did they take off? Did they just go straight up- and wizz back to earth like in the cartoons? What power did they use to get the lunar capsule back to earth? How did they steer the capsule so that it would land in the ocean and not on land?
When they were on the moon they were transmitting pictures- not just sound- but direct TV pictures across the solar system- to earth? What satellite was used to deflect this signal to earth- and with what type of equipment did the men on the moon use to send a signal carrying moving pictures- assumingly, in real time? The earth would not be able to receive a signal that was sent from the moon- unless it was relayed from a communications satellite.
What communications satellietes existed in 1969 to able to send and receive signals (not just voice and radio- but video pictures) from such a distance? Here on earth- enormous amounts of computers, simulators, and other very scientific machinery and instrumentation are required to send the signals to the moon so that communications can be maintained with the crew. Wouldn’t the same amount of sophoisticated equipment be required on the other side- the crew on the moon- who are making films of their exploits there- and supposedly- sending them back to earth for use to see.
For the story to be true- the guys on the moon would have have to send their video signals to a communications satellite near enough to the moon where it would then be relayed to the earth- via another satellite which Nasa would have to relayed to a receiving dish on earth. That is how satellites work. In 1969 the most that could be done on earth
The space travellers would have had to carry with them an enormous amount of communications equipment to be able to send and receive video signals with those of us back on Earth. How could that little lunar module been able to transport enormous amount of equipment to the moon?
If the part of the moon they landed in was pitch black- dark, where did they get enough light to broadcast pictures of their activities? Look at the original Buzz Aldrin photograph. How did they create all this light- to not only light him up- but the entire background of the moon behind him? Did they bring extra lighting and camera equipment with them and then use them outdoors- on the moon surface- with their big gloves and space suits? Would they not have had to have cables coming out of the capsule- as it would be in any TV studio on earch in 1969? How could they be sending complete photos across the solar system to the earth- based on the equipment they had with them on the capsule? Would it not have required a huge amount of room to take all that equipment with them and enormous amounts of fuel? If they did- we certainly didn’t see it.
When the guy in the spacesuit takes a step down the ladder- the says those famous words- who was outside the lunar module on the moon’s surface- filming his boots on the last rung of the ladder? Whoever it was- how could pictures be taken without that having connection via cable to the spaceship where the power would come? To film him coming down the ladder- the pictures would have to be taken from outside the lunar module- not from inside.
What took place- supposedly- was a whole series of video pictures taken on the moon’s surface- by the astronauts- and then they sent these video signals (not voice/radio signals- but actual video footage- like on TV. Even sending picture stills in real time would be amazing. But TV pictures of he event?
We are to believe they whole crew are outside the lunar module- on the moon’s surface. There are at least two- one doing the jumping and the other doing the filming. Where is the guy dealing with the lights? How is so much light being created (enough to take pictures) if the moon (at least in the background of the pictures” looks like it is dark? When the one guy was “playing around” on the moon- how was the other guy who was supposedly filming the event- be able to hold the cameras and the lighting and sound equipment in place if there is no gravity on the moon? What stopped the equipment they were using to film the event from floating off into deep space?
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
1 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Another factor that all the landing hoax retards continue to ignore is that one hour on the Moon is more or less equal to one day on Earth.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
2 
0 (+2)
just to clear a few things up (although,as i said, it is clearly explained on http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/index.html ), what Joel said about thier being no gravity on the moon, that isnt strictly true. there is gravity, but not a lot of it.
also,something i ALREADY mentioned (sheesh did i spend half hour writing to myself here?) about the first footage of man on the moon, is that there is an EXTENDABLE TRIPOD ARM on the side of the ship, seriously, NASA aint dumb they new people would want footage.
another thing, they were trained to use the cameras before hand, thats why it dindnt jiggle about.
one more thing, recently ive heard a lot about so called ‘footage’ of Nasa filming fake footage on earth. for this i will explaing using one thing: common sense.
seriously people, do you REALLY think NASA would keep evidence that they’d faked a moon landing? it aint exactly something thney would want to keep IF the had faked the landings.
another thing, this is NASA were talking about, not some free-lance company! do you really think if they had that stuff theyd let it leak to YOU-TUBE?!!
okay. ive said my bit. let of steam. if you wanna believe it was faked, fine. ignore the evidence, and ignore mans greatest(ish) avhievement. goodnight.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
1 (-1)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
p.s sorry about the typos/spelling mistakes above, i was typing v. quick
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
6 Trackbacks / Pingbacks to
Leave a reply to Apollo Moon Landing Hoax