In 1959 Bill Kaysing predicted that at that time, the chances of getting a man to the moon and back alive were 0.0014%, taking into […]
Continue Reading Moon Landing Fake
Greetings fellow forum readers. I am about to reveal a conspiracy so crazy that you may not believe it. IT began in 0 AD Jesus Christ was born and with his birth a massive explosion of holiness happened blasting a hole in the carpet covering earth. Now you may be thinking ‘hold on a minute Heninrick Van de Fodern, a carpet round earth?’ but yes it is true. In 7000BC a Alien time traveler saw a future human movie called ‘Bruno’ after seeing it he was so disgusted that he thought no other Quanisialorian should have to watch it and so covered it in a pitch black blanket and constantly watcher it surrounding it by torches with only one original hole… The sun. He watches us all the time through the ‘sun’. Anyway the moon was a hole in the blanket. This is why it is bright.
Apollo Moon Landing
the comment from Heinrick Van de Fordern about why it is bright is crazy. i know there are many things the government hides from us…. but serously! only idiots would believe that. as a matter of fact im going to use this as an example in my government class.
The man on the moon hoax is actually true. The thing is they did land on the moon but they found species of what we call extra terrestrials. NASA actually has footage of extra terrestrials and UFO’s they just choose not to reveal it. If you go on to youtube and look up some of the videos it proves that NASA is trying to hide a lot of things. For instance that mars is actually not red it actually looks like a huge desert and is very closely the same to the sahara desert. They have also found pyramids and statues on mars including the moon. The government does not want you to know this because they are very secretive and do not want our society to be chaotic.
I thought the moon landing was already validated when dozens of observatories (Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Mcdonald observatory, Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation, and Haleakala High Altitude Observatory just to name a few) use a retroreflectors that were left on the moon during apollo 11 by man who landed on the moon to measure the distance between the earth and the moon.
I thought the moon landing was already validated when satelite stations from all over the world (Soviet Union’s Space Transmissions Corps, Honeysuckle Creek Tracking Station in Australia, Honeysuckle Creek Tracking Station in Australia, Carnarvon Tracking Station, Pic du Midi de Bigorre in France, and The Madrid Apollo Station in Spain, and Jodrell Bank Observatory in the UK if you want specific examples and there are a LOT more that i’m not listing) were monitoring the apollo missions as they traveled to, and landed on, the moon. ALL of them I have listed and many more have confirmed the moon landings of the apollo missions.
I thought the moon landing was already validated when the lunar orbiter recently took pictures of the apollo landing sites which shows equipment and manmade tracks left on the moon.
I thought the moon landing was already confirmed by the astronauts and hundreds of thousands of people involved in the apollo missions.
I thought the moon landing was already validated when the apollo missions brought back 382 kilograms of moon dust and rocks.
I thought the moon landing was already validated by the pictures and videos of man on the moon.
If the moon landing was a hoax to win the cold war then why on earth would the Soviet Union have several observatories that confirmed our lunar landings?
Brian: Laser reflectors and Unmaned remote rovers were also left on the lunar surface by the rusians long before the U.S. allegedly landed on the moon. The russian devices were deposited there by unmaned missions. Why would you think the presence of lunar based laser reflectors prooves that astronauts went there?
The observatories that you listed did not monitor the astronauts landings on the lunar surface, they were able to monitor the vehicles from launch through high orbit, but were not capable of monitoring a craft that small past high orbit around our planet. All monitoring past that point was done by radio transmission through a relay transiever placed between the earth and the moon prior to the mission launch.
The lunar orbitor that recently took photos of the landing sites was only able to take low resolution pictures where the craft appeared as 6 pixel^2 blob and could not be readily identified. The fact that you can see a trail of footprints on a picture with 3 meters/pixel of resolution only supports the theory that the photos were doctored. Those footpaths would have to be 9 feet across to even show on the images and the equipment cart the astronauts allegedly pulled was only 2 feet wide. The tracks were more likely a natural anomoly of the surface. There are no observatories that confirm the landings Moon rocks are the same as earth rocks. In fact it is theorized by nasa that the moon is a chunk of the earth.
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
THE MOON IS A CHUNK OF THE EARTH?!?!
Seriously? Someone thinks this?
Yes, Tyler most scientists in the world believe that the moon was a chunk of earth blown off by an asteroid impact while the planet was forming. This is due to the similarities between the chemical compsition that makes up both planets. It is a perfectly plausible theory.
“The lunar orbitor that recently took photos of the landing sites was only able to take low resolution pictures where the craft appeared as 6 pixel^2 blob and could not be readily identified. The fact that you can see a trail of footprints on a picture with 3 meters/pixel of resolution only supports the theory that the photos were doctored. ”
The LROC Narrow Angle Camera has 0.5 meter/pixel resolution, not 3 meter/pixel. Plenty fine enough to image the footpaths, not to mention the descent stages.
Moon Landing Hoax Proof
Where Is The Proof!
Show Me The Rocks In Person! Why Are They Not On Display! Why Don’t We See Quality Video and Still Shots From The Moon? Not What Was Shown On Tv? Where Is The Proof! (Next Thing You Will Tell Me Is That The United States Goverment Is For The People And By The People!) Iraq Was Not About Oil! And The Goverment Is Not Controled By The Rich for there well Being! And YoU will Probably say That Corporate America Wants Small Business To Prosper! Go Ahead American Have Been Dumbed down, they will believe anything the media tells them! Who Controls The Media? AH…..!!!!!!! Grow Up Dummy!
Just about everything taught by government schools is false. If gov’t could tell the truth and win, they would lie about it.
how come with all the technologies that have improved since that time, we have not sent anyone to the moon since? It is a hoax.
Why haven’t we sent anyone back to the Moon?
1. It’s expensive. Really, really expensive. The total Apollo program cost is estimated in the range of $170 billion in 2005 dollars (yes, not much compared to what the government spends in total, but it’s still a hefty price tag for any single program). Any modern manned lunar program would cost *at least* that much, and probably a good deal more (hence why Constellation was nixed). That’s because…
2. It’s *hard*. The physics are pretty straightforward, but the engineering is not. Building and launching spacecraft capable of keeping people alive in the vaccuum of space for days or weeks at a time is still a formidable challenge, even with the advances made in the last 40 years. More than half the battle is simply getting off the ground (delta-v from the surface to LEO is between 9.3 and 10 m/s; delta-v from there to the lunar surface is like 6.4 m/s). The more massive the spacecraft, the bigger the booster required to get it there. Think about how big the Saturn V was relative to the size of the spacecraft (CM and LM). The first two stages were spent just getting the lunar stack (S-IVB booster, CSM, and LM) into Earth orbit. We’ve squeezed about as much performance out of liquid-fueled rockets as we’re going to get; now it’s all about managing costs.
3. There’s no point. We’re not going to be doing much beyond basic exploration for the next several decades at least, and unmanned probes provide much more bang for the buck as far as that’s concerned. Look at the phenomenal success of the Mars exploration program (Pathfinder, Global Surveyor, MERs, etc.). We’ve learned far more about Mars from those programs than we did about the Moon from Apollo. For the cost of a single manned mission, would could pepper the surface of the Moon with rovers and sample return vehicles and get a far more comprehensive view of the Moon for far less effort. Unmanned systems are lower mass (no need to carry along air, food, or water) and so don’t require such huge boosters, they can be built to withstand the harsh environment, and they don’t have to come home. They can stay on site until their power gives out. The only real reason to send *people* anywhere is to establish a permanent settlement. That’s not going to happen anytime soon, if ever.
No more expensive then the trillions of dollars the gov’t keep throwing around. They lost a couple of trillion at the Pentagon. Must have given the false state of iraelie a trillion by now. Who cares? Just print up some more counterfeit federal reserve notes. Make the great, great, great, grand kids pay for it.
First of all, from what I have seen, the radiation dose estimates hoax theory believers suggest are invalid (more to come later). Secondly, I don’t think anyone pro or con on the hoax debate is a “sheep”, “idiot”, etc. Many do get the entirely human emotional response of being defensive when their own views are challanged. This cannot help either side to present their particular view in a logical way. That being said, the best way to scientifically attempt to validate a point is to present the best known facts from the most reliable sources. The problem with conspiracy theorists seems to be (from what I have seen in the many web-based posts, videos, articles, etc.)they generally believe only their own sources, as any other source “must” be influenced by whatever or whomever the conspiracists are arguing against. On the other hand, they do bring up some valid points (many seem laughable to those who have real expertise in some areas, but even experts are not experts at everything, so why should they expect everyone to have the same amount of knowledge in their field of expertise as they do?) which should be considered. And dismissing them or calling them “whacky” does not provide any logical rebuttal.
Sorry for the long-winded intro, but I just want to say that I have found contradictions in some of the debunkers statements, but far, far more in the statements and “evidence” presented by the hoax supporters. I am going to provide you with one clear example on which I have 29 years of associated expertise (part of my job involves measuring and documenting radiation levels involved with nucleear repair work) where the conspirators have it flat wrong. One of their main “smoking gun” arguements is that no astronaut could survive the trip(s) thru the Van Allen radiation belts. Now I do not have all the data from those belts, but I can tell you how fields of radiation work. The conspiracists perform their math for the Van Allen belt(s)(including the South American Anomoly) using the estimated travel time thru the belt(s) multiplied my the MAXIMUM radiation dose(s) recorded. In fact, any entire radiation field, is NOT uniform. This can easily be confirmed for the Van Allen belts just by visiting the history of their discovery. They were discovered when geiger counters on rocketships noticed an “increase in the amount of “clicks” (or detectable radiological interactions). This would be where the Van Allen belts start – at rather low levels, then increasing as you get to the denser flux (or more radioactively hazardous) portions of the belts. The maximum flux tends to be towards the center or central regions of the field. There is no physically possible way for the astronauts to be exposed to the MAXIMUM radiation levels for their entire trip thru the Van Allen belts. Also, NASA would do whatever they reasonably could to prevent their spacecraft from entering those areas of MAXIMUM radiation. From the data presented from the dose assignments I have seen given to the various astronauts for their trips, their exposures seem quite reasonable to what I would expect based on my own experience. Also, to illustrate what I am saying for those who would like an analogy, I would compare going thru a Van Allen belt like jumping thru a ring of fire (this is not meant to be a “perfect” analogy, but does represent many of the actual physical characteristics of a radiation field). If you were to approach the ring of fire there would be a point where you could feel the heat of the flame – this would be the beginning of the Van Allen belt. You could stay there for quite some time without coming to harm. If you were to get much closer to the flame you could indeed be injured, and, depending on the amount of time spent close to or in the flame, even die. But if you jumped thru the hoop you would likely feel only momentary heat resulting in no injury, even if you pass thru the flame. In conclusion, I just want to re-iterate the hoax theory proponents have their radiation estimates drastically wrong.
Take a good look at that cardboard contraption they landed on the moon with. A lowly county building inspector wouldn’t pass that thing. Quite the joke.
Why can't anyone debunk videos and pictures?
You may think you’re debunking the facts but then you’re not. Logic doesn’t really apply on this kind of proof so keep it away, explain with physics if you think you can handle it.
The documentary “What Happened on the Moon” is very interesting (hoax-wise of course). NOTICE TO LLBs: You will never be able to look at this subject the same way.
If anything NASA is to blame for the whole hoax theory because of photo retouching and video set-ups, even if the propaganda targeted securing future fundings. The blast are the videos which show growing shadows cast by the astronauts when they get a few feet nearer the “sun” in relation to a second astronaut a few feet away. Man, that’s just irrefutable, swallow it up.
You can also suck on your thumbs while watching some of this material: http://www.aulis.com
I think it was fake
Check out this youtube video of a guy acting like an idiot on the moon….Very stupid !
+++ Moar Basment Dwelling Phun +++
The moon landing was a cleverly designed plan to fool all people who thought it was a hoax. And guess what? NASA got away with it! NASA tricked all you basement dwellers into believing it was a hoax. All the astronauts pwnd you from the moon. In fact… when us smart people leave to live on mars, we will remember you hoax believers as our “village idiots”.
Who you going to call?
I have the truth...
this video is a piece of history!! :D