In 1959 Bill Kaysing predicted that at that time, the chances of getting a man to the moon and back alive were 0.0014%, taking into account radiation and micro meteors.
Just 2 years later US president J. F. Kennedy made his famous speech.
“I believe that this nation should commit itself. To achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind or more important for the long range exploration of Space.”
Eight years later in on the 16th of July 1969, Apollo 11 was launched on a mission to the moon and back, carrying three people. On the 20th of July Apollo 11 landed on the moon. Neil Armstrong stepped out of the Lunar Module (LM) in front of a watching world, climbed down the ladder and said those famous words.
“One small step for man one giant leap for mankind”
And in doing so, Neil Armstrong won the moon race against Russia for America, and proved to an entire world that the sky isn’t the only limit.
Or so NASA said!
Ever since 1969, a small but loud crowd of people have doubted that America did send a man to the moon, and the Apollo Hoax was born.
There are three basic kinds of arguments for this hoax: Photographic, video, and scientific. See the links below for moon landing hoax research and discussions.
See our Apollo Moon Landing Forum.
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Camera Problems
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Video Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?
135 responses to Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
In the movie Casino Royale James Bond crashes into a dome. Inside are 2 men in astronaut gear ‘floating’ around as if they were in the moon’s atmosphere, weightless. The ceiling of the inside of the dome is painted to look as if it were black space, with stars, earth, etc. Bond isn’t affected by lack of gravity, since there is no lack of it, and steals the moon vehicle and crashes out of the dome into a parking lot and escapes. This book, as were all the first 007 books, was written by Ian Fleming, who had been in British intelligence before the James Bond books. The dome is owned by Willard White, a rich industralist of some type who lives in the top of a motel in Vegas, and hasn’t been seen in 3 years. The major plot of the movie is White has been kidnapped. Sounds like Howard Hughes. Hughes was credited for cooperating with the CIA in building a boat to recover a lost Soviet sub. Maybe Ian Fleming was giving us a hint.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
if others dont believe the stepping up of man on to the moon then why dont nasa can prepare other project and send one more person to prove that they are right.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
a.navaneethakrishnan wrote:
if others dont believe the stepping up of man on to the moon then why dont nasa can prepare other project and send one more person to prove that they are right.
——————————————————-
The answer to that question is another question: Why bother?
Just to go up there and prove it can be done is silly, since we are talking about risking a persons life just to go “I told you so”. It also wouldn’t prove anything since the conspiracy theorists would still say they didn’t do it in 1969, and we only just had the technology to go up to the moon, AKA: The conspiracy is still possibly valid.
There are only two real reason for continuing the moon landings:
1: The moon is mineral rich. If a technique can be devised for getting the minerals off the moon and onto earth, it would make whatever country who did it very rich.
2: Exploration of Mars. Making a moon base would knock three days off of the journey, making the trips a lot less expensive. Also the lower gravity would mean less take off fuel is needed, again less money spent. Also making a moon base would be a better testing ground then a Mars base. Since the moon is closer to the earth and can be change faster if needed.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
1 (-1)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
A recent satalite has orbited and took detailed pictures of the moon ie like google earth but for some strange reason no pictures have returned or been on the news to show apollo landing sites thus proving one way or the other the conspiracy theory I WONDER WHY !!!!!
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
it was,nt a hoax you morons.
you might aswell say that nobody has ever been to the north pole..and so on
if you dont think anything is true then you need help..now shut up going on about it and get a life
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
1 (-1)
you are all nerds with nothing better to do than make up bullshit about the american governent. they may suck but they don’t fake moon landings and blow up their own buildings.
while you were making up this crap, other NORMAL people were with their GIRLFRIENDS which i doubt any of you have ever had. and you are all probably 40-something and still living with your parents playing World of Warcraft all day.
GET LIVES YOU STUPID NERDS!!!!!!
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Hey Joe why waste your time reading stuff on the internet looking for people to argue with, go get a life. or better yet an education
I don’t believe that NASA landed on the moon. That doesn’t make me a “conspiracy theorist” or a “hoax believer,” just a serious skeptic who finds the evidence contrary. Hoax-debunkers miss the point: the burden of proof is on NASA. They say things like, the flags motion could have been harmonic motion caused by Armstrong moving it (I’ve run the video over and over and I don’t think that fits). They say photographic anomalies could have been caused by earth light or color bleeding. These are weak rebuttals because they are possibilities, not certainties.
It’s not incumbent on the unbeliever to prove anything, simply to keep an open mind to the most convincing evidence. I am not convinced.
I certainly believe the government could pull off such a hoax, especially compartmentalized as it is. Big scandals like Watergate, Iran-contra, and the small number of people who admitted to knowing about them -- even when they were uncovered and prosecuted -- convince me it’s possible. NASA hasn’t shown it impossible just yet, and seems arrogant to not even be trying. Its attitude seems to be that anyone who mistrusts the government is a moron. Rather, anyone who trusts the government implicitly is naive.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
I’m sure we have all seen the evidence and, like me, are convinced it was all a bunch of bad fakery….
Here is the latest proof for ya…
They have excuse after excuse why we can’t see the hardware at the landing sites on the moon…even with hubble.
hmmm…for some reason land based and hubble can see the hardware from “opportunity” landing on Mars….Mars is a little further than the moon.
So…do some browsing and try to disprove this one too.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Hey Kozz, why do you think that it is up to NASA to prove something you would think has conclusive proof, in the form of thousands of hours of footage and stills, independantly varified telemetry and Lunar samples? Don’t you think the burden of proof would lie with those who are in effect saying “ok, well APART from all that, what evidence do you have?”
This is the one popular idea that just flummoxes me: every time I see these arguements, I ask -- what about the fricken rocks man? They cannot be faked, they could not be picked up by a remote rover. One of them is the size of your head. It’s just ludicrous.
Oh and Mike B: That is not proof. That is called ignorance. They have not imaged the rovers with Hubble, those images are from orbiting satellites. Orbiting mars, that is.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
ignorance is not knowing that meteors can hit the moon, eject rocks from the moon, moon rocks land on earth and are sorted out from other “meteors” that have come to earth. And anyways I have rocks in my back yard that look exactly like those “moon” rocks…
Yes i don’t want to believe in this hoax junk either…but I am also in touch with reality as well…just as science has killed alot of my religous beliefs.
The truth is depressing….but I’d rather not live in la la land either.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax 6 Trackbacks / Pingbacks
More Photographic Evidence Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Another problem with the photos can be seen in the next two images below.
Several astronauts seem to be lit up, as if they were standing in a spot light, even though they are in a large shadow!
Many hoax debunking theories have been made to explain this. The most popular explanation is the Earth gives off its own light that highlights the astronauts. But if the Earth gave off that much light, then a shadow would appear behind each person, and there would be multiple shadows in every moon photo.
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
6 
10 (-4)
Camera Problems Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
On all of the cameras there is a + in the middle of the lens to help with distance but on some of the pictures objects overlap the plus. This suggests that the plus was added later.
But the answer for this is simple. If you notice, all of the overlapping objects are bright and white. Because of this, the colour background bleeds into the thin cross, making the cross fade/disappear.
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
8 
10 (-2)
Photographic Evidence Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Photographs are the main argument for the conspiracy believers, as there are thousands of photographs that have anomalies on them. (i.e.: different directions on shadows, things ‘highlighted’.) Because of these anomalies, the photos are believed fake by the conspiracy followers. These people reason “why create fake photos of something that really happened?”
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
3 
9 (-6)
Video Evidence Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
The most consistently seen argument of moon hoax believers, is why, in a land with no air, the American flag stands up and waves, instead of falling down to the ground? And yes, if you look closely at the moon flag video clip, (Realtime player required.) it does appear as if Neil is fighting with the USA flag. But, if you look even closer, you can see that the flag is only flapping when Neil is holding it, and trying to twist the flag into the ground. (You can’t see this that well because of convenient editing.). Because of this the flag waving can be accounted for by Neil twisting the pole.
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
6 
13 (-7)
Scientific Evidence Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Radiation would kill the astronauts
Many conspiracists believe that NASA never left the Earth’s atmosphere, because of the amount of radiation in The Van Allen radiation belt would kill an astronaut. But with help from other sources (thanks clavius moon base) We can determine if this is true. The American legal radiation limit below are a helpful.
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
4 
7 (-3)
Why Fake a Moon Landing? Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Wether the conspiracy was possible or if there was a motive for faking the landings, is a big part of the moon hoax.
Many conspiracy debunkers say that there was no reason for the US to fake the moon landings.
This is false, as at the time America was publicly losing the space race, as Russia had put the:
First man/woman in space.
First animal in space.
First three person mission in space.
And the first space station in orbit.
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
10 
9 (+1)
Leave a reply to Apollo Moon Landing Hoax