In 1959 Bill Kaysing predicted that at that time, the chances of getting a man to the moon and back alive were 0.0014%, taking into account radiation and micro meteors.
Just 2 years later US president J. F. Kennedy made his famous speech.
“I believe that this nation should commit itself. To achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind or more important for the long range exploration of Space.”
Eight years later in on the 16th of July 1969, Apollo 11 was launched on a mission to the moon and back, carrying three people. On the 20th of July Apollo 11 landed on the moon. Neil Armstrong stepped out of the Lunar Module (LM) in front of a watching world, climbed down the ladder and said those famous words.
“One small step for man one giant leap for mankind”
And in doing so, Neil Armstrong won the moon race against Russia for America, and proved to an entire world that the sky isn’t the only limit.
Or so NASA said!
Ever since 1969, a small but loud crowd of people have doubted that America did send a man to the moon, and the Apollo Hoax was born.
There are three basic kinds of arguments for this hoax: Photographic, video, and scientific. See the links below for moon landing hoax research and discussions.
See our Apollo Moon Landing Forum.
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Camera Problems
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Video Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?
137 responses to Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Proof enough to me is that at the time the moon landing happened the technology for a moon landing existed.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
3 
5 (-2)
Proof:
If we can launch shuttles, sattelites, and intercontinental missles out of Geosynchronous orbit (these things have been clearly proved by unrefuted data). Also, we can clearly launch humans into space. Proved by hundreds if not thousands of unrefutable missions. Then, what is two stop us from going to the moon? The answer is very little. Once we are past this point the shuttle can basically cruze on to the moon with little gravity resistance and little to know molecular resistance due to their rareified state. All that is needed now is a navigational system and too be able to keep going straight. The first has been proved effective by use of earth based tracking system and space based ones on non-human missions. As for going straight all that is needed is a gyroscope. Now to legitimately land on the moon the technology is very low tech for NASA. All that is required is a small ship with the poower to get from the craft to the moon and back. This technology is about the simplest thing imaginable. To refute the possiblity would be insanity. Then they just need to power back to earth, which is again easy due to lack of gravity and rarefied molecules. Finally, they simply need to reenter earths atmoshpere. For this a simple shielding layer can be used. This final piece has been proved time and time again.
All the steps apart are simple, logical, and proved possible.
I realize this isn’t an exact description, but I was trying to simplify it. For a more accurate and complete description visit nasa.gov/
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
7 (-6)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
This comment is for those with a good grip on reality but are puzzled with some of the Moonhoaxtards claims.
Myth Busters did an excellent set of episodes explaining the strange behavior of the flags, the light anomalies, and a few others.
I admit, I was intrigued by the hoax claims at first.
But when I watched Myth Busters, it made perfect sense.
I have no interest in trying to convert the die hard moon hoaxers.
You can’t fix stupid.
Nor do I wish to get into a completely pointless debate with morons.
This comment is solely for the people sitting on the fence with regards to the debate.
Do a search on Youtube for Myth Busters moon landing hoax.
I’m sure this comment will get lots of nasty replies.
That’s why I have no intention of coming back to this comment section.
So Moonhoaxtards, fire away.
Maybe even pretend your computer monitor is my head and punch it in.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
6 (-5)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
I am not a expert
After looking at all the pictures the space craft looks so fake. I don’t see how a craft that looks like that could make it through earth’s atmosphere going to and from space? I think heat is a big factor?
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
0 (+1)
If you’re talking about the LM, you’re absolutely right that it was not designed the survive the kinds of pressure and thermal loads that launch and re-entry would have subjected it to.
Therefore, during launch, it was kept in a protective fairing behind the CSM until the S-IVB booster was well out of Earth orbit (see illustration at http://jleslie48.com/0206pr/saturn5allclean2.jpg), and it was jettisoned before re-entry.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax 6 Trackbacks / Pingbacks
More Photographic Evidence Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Another problem with the photos can be seen in the next two images below.
Several astronauts seem to be lit up, as if they were standing in a spot light, even though they are in a large shadow!
Many hoax debunking theories have been made to explain this. The most popular explanation is the Earth gives off its own light that highlights the astronauts. But if the Earth gave off that much light, then a shadow would appear behind each person, and there would be multiple shadows in every moon photo.
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
7 
11 (-4)
Camera Problems Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
On all of the cameras there is a + in the middle of the lens to help with distance but on some of the pictures objects overlap the plus. This suggests that the plus was added later.
But the answer for this is simple. If you notice, all of the overlapping objects are bright and white. Because of this, the colour background bleeds into the thin cross, making the cross fade/disappear.
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
9 
10 (-1)
Photographic Evidence Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Photographs are the main argument for the conspiracy believers, as there are thousands of photographs that have anomalies on them. (i.e.: different directions on shadows, things ‘highlighted’.) Because of these anomalies, the photos are believed fake by the conspiracy followers. These people reason “why create fake photos of something that really happened?”
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
3 
9 (-6)
Video Evidence Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
The most consistently seen argument of moon hoax believers, is why, in a land with no air, the American flag stands up and waves, instead of falling down to the ground? And yes, if you look closely at the moon flag video clip, (Realtime player required.) it does appear as if Neil is fighting with the USA flag. But, if you look even closer, you can see that the flag is only flapping when Neil is holding it, and trying to twist the flag into the ground. (You can’t see this that well because of convenient editing.). Because of this the flag waving can be accounted for by Neil twisting the pole.
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
7 
13 (-6)
Scientific Evidence Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Radiation would kill the astronauts
Many conspiracists believe that NASA never left the Earth’s atmosphere, because of the amount of radiation in The Van Allen radiation belt would kill an astronaut. But with help from other sources (thanks clavius moon base) We can determine if this is true. The American legal radiation limit below are a helpful.
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
4 
7 (-3)
Why Fake a Moon Landing? Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Wether the conspiracy was possible or if there was a motive for faking the landings, is a big part of the moon hoax.
Many conspiracy debunkers say that there was no reason for the US to fake the moon landings.
This is false, as at the time America was publicly losing the space race, as Russia had put the:
First man/woman in space.
First animal in space.
First three person mission in space.
And the first space station in orbit.
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
10 
10 (0)
Leave a reply to Apollo Moon Landing Hoax