Comments on: Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?

By: Ben

Ben — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:34:47 +0000

God I hate conspiracy theorists

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 1 0 (+1)

By: Ozzy Moron

Ozzy Moron — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:31:41 +0000

Great comment, der … well reasoned, very convincing, really proves your point…

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: Ozzy Moron

Ozzy Moron — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:25:40 +0000

“But the conspiracy believers haven’t given ‘conclusive’ proof … ”

Is it really the responsibility of so-called “conspiracy theorists” to “prove” man didn’t land on the moon?

No. The burden of proof lies with those who claim man did land on the moon.

I can see no reason to trust the word of the government or its agents.

I am not convinced man did walk on the moon… I saw it on TV, but that doesn’t prove anything.

I have yet to see convincing proof that any man did actually land on the moon.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: william swithin

william swithin — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:10:52 +0000

I am prepared to admit that at the time when the moon landings were on the TV i was sure that it happened. Today having done a lot of research I am convinced for hundreds of reasons that the landing never actualy took place. When you think about it there is not one photo that is unquestionable, they are all fakes. Take a report today in a newspaper showing the American mars rover. Real good close up clear photos of the rover. All I am saying to the Americans is, if you went to the moon, if you left a moon buggy, an American flag and a landing craft there why is it that you cannot show us close up clear photos from the satalite that has just swept the moon. Just remember the Japanese Selen showed no evidence what so ever. Thats all I am asking, give us the proof.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 2 0 (+2)

By: Naoiwi

Naoiwi — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:42:46 +0000

Hi, actually I never gave any of this a second thought to be honest with you but now that you bring it all up, Im asking myself, did we really have the technology in the 60’s? to actually go to the moon? hmmmmmm because things were nothing then as they are now as far as that goes and Im really finding it a little hard to believe that they had the means back then to actually get to the moon. But who knows? I dont know but its something to think about I think.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: C

Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:31:37 +0000

all that can be explained due to the fact that the moon itself reflects light and therefore any light would then multilpy as the sun or even the lunars lights u tard look it up and the fact that the moon reflects light would explain the shadows not matching up ur a really dumb idiot dont know what ur talking about dont talk about it u giant tard

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: C

Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:22:27 +0000

ur an idiot

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: C

Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:18:56 +0000

ur dumb

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 1 1 (0)

By: Vamp

Vamp — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:13:43 +0000

I saw one of those faked vids but it has OJ Simpson in it.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 2 2 (0)

By: Der

Der — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:08:23 +0000

If you think that the moon landing was a hoax, then you’re a idiot. It’s as simple as that.

Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think? 3 9 (-6)