The most consistently seen argument of moon hoax believers, is why, in a land with no air, the American flag stands up and waves, instead of falling down to the ground? And yes, if you look closely at the moon flag video clip, (Realtime player required.) it does appear as if Neil is fighting with the USA flag. But, if you look even closer, you can see that the flag is only flapping when Neil is holding it, and trying to twist the flag into the ground. (You can’t see this that well because of convenient editing.). Because of this the flag waving can be accounted for by Neil twisting the pole.

But the conspiracists also say that there are at least one photo, where the flag is flapping and the astronauts are no where near the flag. The explanation for this is simple. NASA’s flag was on an antenna, connected to the pole which pulled out like a radio receiver. At Apollo 11, the antenna wouldn’t pull out all of the way, causing a ripple which looks like a waving flag if taken through a camera. On later missions the flag wasn’t pulled out all of the way because it looked better.
But the most publicly advertised hoax conspiracy is the Coke can hoax. A woman called Una Ronald was said to have spotted a Coke can bounce along the floor. Left there are some frames of the video. The supposed “Coke bottle” is shown highlighted.

Even though it doesn’t look much like a Coke can – as it can be barely seen on still photos – it is still something. And that something is light. In this clip Neil is demonstrating the bunny hop (a kind of walk) and he’s moving from left to right. What is happening, is the light from the sun, is reflecting from Neil’s visor and showing up on the camera. The visor and the Coke can is shown with purple dots and connected with a yellow line, the middle of the screen is marked out in the blue lines.
If you see the yellow line crosses the center in every picture. This anomaly is called a catadioptrism, or ghosting and you can see several cases of this in the Original Apollo Moon Landing Film.
If you look at the film closely, another example of ghosting is shown, as half of the time there are three astronauts running around on the moon. Also the ‘Coke can’ appears twice in different places, and it doesn’t make sense that there was two Coke cans on the moon, both slipping detection. Also if you freeze the frames with the Coke in shot, you can see that the can is bent in different places at different times!
But many people will argue, that the reason why you couldn’t see the Coke sign and the can is bent, is because the video is too low a quality. Which in itself is a conspiracy.
The theory is, the video was low quality on purpose, to stop critical analysis, but there is a another, more reasonable reason. The first plans for TV broadcast, was a giant satellite dish set up on the moon by the astronauts. NASA wanted to record the first step on the moon, but the dish would take to long to set up, in the short amount of time they had, so the small transmission satellite dish on the moon lander was used resulting in lower quality images.
This section was supposed to be much larger, but I couldn’t find much original footage that hadn’t been tampered with. (i.e. convenient editing) or the full film. So I can’t explain all of the video arguments the conspiracists have presented in full.
See our Apollo Moon Landing Forum.
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Camera Problems
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Video Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?
Moon Landing Hoax Fun Video
Well if you didn’t believe it was a big government conspiracy before watching the video below, you will afterwards. It’s very funny





57 responses to Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Video Evidence
I have watched a couple of videos on this, and as a scientist I am critical as of yet. All the lighting theories do not disprove anything, since we are not sure as to the equipment given to the astronauts in terms of tripods or lightings to obtain the shots. We do not have access to the data on the temperature , so to damage the film. The flag that ripples is also not proof, and the footprints left in the soil seem parculiar since, but still do not give enough proof to dispute the claim that we landed on the moon.
The only thing I thought was very strange is that the propulsion engines near the surface of the moon left no marking under the craft of apollo 11. If the weight of the a human footprint left impressions which they did, then why the propulsion engines left not even a trace of impact is questionable. I was also disturbed about the recently found shots of how and when the pictures were taken of the earth. The films clearly shows buzz aldrin, neil armstong.. in the module, and the earth is filling the entire perimeter of the window of that craft. The NASA films document the time of these photos, taken on July 19, and the 20th. If this is true… these astronauts were orbiting in space possibly not trackable by radar, and less than 250 miles from the earth surface. The video of them landing on the moon would therefore have to have been faked.
The only real proof that they made it to the moon, would be location and identification of the united state flag. The earth located lasor labs that pick up data by reflective signals place on the moon, could be a false positive signal. Also, the debris from the moon should be collected and returned to earth, and the rocks brought home from the astronauts should be a footprint match.
If it was real -- it is the of the greatest scientific advances in our lifetime. If it was forged, well,, they did a good job at that too.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Video Evidence
Before the days of video tape, I set up my Polaroid B&W camera in front of the TV and took pictures LIVE of the moon landing. What are these pictures worth to a collector?
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0
0 (0)
the moon is fake ur all fake im real im king lalalalala
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0
0 (0)
i agree with Yo MAMMA
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0
0 (0)
i truely belive that apollo moonlandings a hoax!its a shame for NASA to do a movie & make to belive the people of america that it had landed the first man on moon
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0
0 (0)
Like, don’t we have satellite photos of the moon similar to google earth? Why don’t they just take some photos of all the crap we ‘left’ on the moon (flag, rover etc) and prove that we went? I mean, it shouldn’t be hard to find a car on the moon when we know where they landed? I mean, I can find my favourite actor’s car using goole earth and earth is WAAAAY bigger than the moon.
Peace out.
Oh, and why are there NO stars EVER in the background of ANY frame of video? I mean, like wouldn’t they pan out at the amazing starscape? A star should have accidentally slipped in there. Hmmmmmm? Heeeellllooooooooooooooooo?
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Video Evidence
If we landed on the moon then where are the satellite photos of the landing sites? We have spy satellites tracking terrorists and can identify their faces. We have satellites on google maps for free that show higher resolution than what comes back from the moon. So what gives???? All of these countries that have gone back to the moon with their own satellites, and we still have no pictures of the Apollo landing sites? Seems strange.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Video Evidence
Why is it that every time someone discusses evidence of moon landing hoaxes, some idiot has to inject Alien races and crystal towers on the moon? Probably some schlub on the NASA payroll trying to discredit the whole topic of discussing possible NASA hoaxes. Again, WHERE ARE THE SATELLITE PICTURES OF THE APOLLO LANDING SITES?!?! There are satellite pictures of my dog taking a shit in my back yard on google maps. Where are the pictures of the lunar lander sites?!?! The silence is deafening on this subject.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Video Evidence
Is this the pinnacle of the excitement in your life…?
Following other peoples conspiracies?
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0
0 (0)
When they deliver the photos of the sites will we believe them?
You need some uniquely human means of physically showing earth you are there that could not be explained by not being managed remotely.
The only way we could prove it is to go back, and be more innovativein showing what the moon’s atmosphere is really, basic visual experiments that show low pressure, low density, high radiation, experiments that would extremely be hard to replicate in a large hollywood studio
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Video Evidence
Leave a reply to Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Video Evidence