You can reflect a laser off the moon’s surface.
No reflector required.
True, but a lot more of the laser’s light is reflected when a reflector is used. The reflectors reflect all light back in the direction it came from. Light reflected off the lunar surface refracts in many directions, only a small percentage of it returns to the observatory that the laser originated from. That means there is a significant difference in the power of the returning laser light when a reflector is used.
Clearly something is at the location of the LRRRs left on the Moon by the Apollo astronauts.
More Comments by LunarOrbit
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence
My main concern is that if they really did land on the moon in 1969, then why was there not a single attempt to repeat the feat
Ummm… NASA landed men on the Moon five more times after Apollo 11.
Don’t we …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
For me it is that easy to say that the moon landings never happened.
Then you’re a gullible fool who hasn’t bothered to learn anything about Apollo.
And in a sense they never did because I wasn’t born yet when they occurred.
What …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
I did not verify any of the “facts” stated here
Maybe you should. You’d look less like a fool if you didn’t constantly cite unverified claims.
Even if most of the alleged US Moon rocks are real, the Russians were able to …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
That is why no one takes you HBs seriously. You can’t get your stories straight. We see HBs saying robotic probes put the laser reflectors on the Moon… and then other HBs who say the lasers were simply reflected off …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
…do you get payed? Can you put a word for me?
Ah, yes, the old “accuse the debunkers of being paid government agents” trick. Is that all you’ve got left? It’s a pathetic argument.
Where can I find the manual you use …
More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence by LunarOrbit
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
For me it is that easy to say that the moon landings never happened.
Then you’re a gullible fool who hasn’t bothered to learn anything about Apollo.
And in a sense they never did because I wasn’t born yet when they occurred.
What …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
I did not verify any of the “facts” stated here
Maybe you should. You’d look less like a fool if you didn’t constantly cite unverified claims.
Even if most of the alleged US Moon rocks are real, the Russians were able to …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
That is why no one takes you HBs seriously. You can’t get your stories straight. We see HBs saying robotic probes put the laser reflectors on the Moon… and then other HBs who say the lasers were simply reflected off …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
…do you get payed? Can you put a word for me?
Ah, yes, the old “accuse the debunkers of being paid government agents” trick. Is that all you’ve got left? It’s a pathetic argument.
Where can I find the manual you use …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
I’m sorry, but I just don’t see anything unusual about those boot prints. They match perfectly with the treads on the Apollo boots.
I’ve created an image of the prints on the Moon side-by-side with the bottom of the boots.
http://bit.ly/hCEfd0 …