Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence by ner0.

Just for the fun, and I stress that I did not verify any of the “facts” stated here, here’s a hoaxer citation:

[Even if most of the alleged US Moon rocks are real, the Russians were able to bring back a small Lunar sample with an unmanned probe (Could US probes bring back larger samples? Were people on the Moon even needed for that?). Anyway, unlike the Apollo lunar samples, their Soviet counterparts exhibit triboluminescence and non-oxidation, contain 6 to 9 times more mercury (which should be uniformly distributed on the lunar surface), orders of magnitude more molybdenum, wolfram, cadmium and silver, and have 50 times lower thermoluminescence sensitivity. Also, A. Dollfus and E. Bouell of the Paris Observatory found that unlike the NASA samples, the polarisation of reflected light from the Soviet samples corresponds to that from the Moon surface. Geochemist Minoru Ozima of the Tokyo University discovered that the nitrogen-14/nitrogen-15 isotope ratio in the Apollo lunar samples is very different from that in the solar wind whose blasts drilled these atoms into the lunar soil. A possible explanation is that the Apollo’s soil was made on Earth. In the 1990s, publications about lunar soil simulation started to appear. If they appeared earlier, they would raise questions about the Apollo programme.

27 of 61 space rocket launches in 1968 were secret, and 20 of 47 were secret in 1969. That’s 47 secret launches. What were they doing? Sending probes to pick up lunar samples? Sending probes to place mirrors on the Moon? Doing their camera tricks in Earth’s orbit to make it appear as if they were much farther from Earth than they really were?

PS – Don’t call us “conspiracy theorists”. This is a pejorative stigma that basically says “We don’t like you, and your thoughts should not be taken seriously by others”. We are Apollo skeptics and Moon-hoax theorists. We’re not sheeple.

Please don’t give me red herrings. Explain this petrified wood being passed off as a Moon rock.]

[Source:]
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100315140520AAqkSd7

As I said, did not verify any of this but it certainly would support hoaxers arguments if any true to it!

More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence by ner0


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

“Then you’re a gullible fool who hasn’t bothered to learn anything about Apollo.”

Sure, I picked up a few things here and there but never put that much effort in disseminating Apollo material. I am as gullible as the next guy …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

I’m always looking for a new perspective and would be glad to have a look at those Apollo mission sites on the moon taken by either Indian or Japanese missions. Were can I view those photos? If someone can feed …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

Oops! Be careful, you may hurt some geek intellect when they are convinced they did the exact math to pinpoint the laser beam direction to target a specific area for that purpose. Really? You can bounce a laser from any …


How much…

…do you get payed? Can you put a word for me? Where can I find the manual you use as a guideline to discredit hoaxers? Debunkers need that manual now more than ever!

Thanks.

P.S.: Stop crying like a baby, it …


Truth – Out of context

Those are by far the two best quotes I found about the moon landing hoax:

“The author [of a book] observed one of the Apollo 14 astronauts in a movie film of the mission. The astronaut was running in semi slow-motion …


More Comments by ner0


Apollo 16 “Jump Salute”

It seems that it is not possible for the footage covering this event to have been shot on the moon. When jumping for this historic snapshot, the astronaut stays in suspension far too long, accounting for the moon’s gravitational force …


Why can’t anyone debunk videos and pictures?

You may think you’re debunking the facts but then you’re not.
Logic doesn’t really apply on this kind of proof so keep it away, explain with physics if you think you can handle it.

The documentary “What Happened on the Moon” is …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

“Then you’re a gullible fool who hasn’t bothered to learn anything about Apollo.”

Sure, I picked up a few things here and there but never put that much effort in disseminating Apollo material. I am as gullible as the next guy …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

I’m always looking for a new perspective and would be glad to have a look at those Apollo mission sites on the moon taken by either Indian or Japanese missions. Were can I view those photos? If someone can feed …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

Oops! Be careful, you may hurt some geek intellect when they are convinced they did the exact math to pinpoint the laser beam direction to target a specific area for that purpose. Really? You can bounce a laser from any …