Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence by LunarOrbit.

…do you get payed? Can you put a word for me?

Ah, yes, the old “accuse the debunkers of being paid government agents” trick. Is that all you’ve got left? It’s a pathetic argument.

Where can I find the manual you use as a guideline to discredit hoaxers?

We don’t need a manual… just basic knowledge about Apollo which is something the hoax believers lack. You see, once you understand how Apollo got to the Moon there is no reason to doubt that it is possible.

Hoax believers base their arguments on rumours, speculation, and junk science. Your theories are full of holes that leave people with more questions than answers. You haven’t provided an alternative to the official story that actually makes sense, so why should I believe you instead of NASA?

More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence by LunarOrbit


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

For me it is that easy to say that the moon landings never happened.

Then you’re a gullible fool who hasn’t bothered to learn anything about Apollo.

And in a sense they never did because I wasn’t born yet when they occurred.

What …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

I did not verify any of the “facts” stated here

Maybe you should. You’d look less like a fool if you didn’t constantly cite unverified claims.

Even if most of the alleged US Moon rocks are real, the Russians were able to …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

That is why no one takes you HBs seriously. You can’t get your stories straight. We see HBs saying robotic probes put the laser reflectors on the Moon… and then other HBs who say the lasers were simply reflected off …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

You can reflect a laser off the moon’s surface.
No reflector required.

True, but a lot more of the laser’s light is reflected when a reflector is used. The reflectors reflect all light back in the direction it came from. Light reflected …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

I’m sorry, but I just don’t see anything unusual about those boot prints. They match perfectly with the treads on the Apollo boots.

I’ve created an image of the prints on the Moon side-by-side with the bottom of the boots.

http://bit.ly/hCEfd0 …


More Comments by LunarOrbit


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence

My main concern is that if they really did land on the moon in 1969, then why was there not a single attempt to repeat the feat

Ummm… NASA landed men on the Moon five more times after Apollo 11.

Don’t we …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

For me it is that easy to say that the moon landings never happened.

Then you’re a gullible fool who hasn’t bothered to learn anything about Apollo.

And in a sense they never did because I wasn’t born yet when they occurred.

What …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

I did not verify any of the “facts” stated here

Maybe you should. You’d look less like a fool if you didn’t constantly cite unverified claims.

Even if most of the alleged US Moon rocks are real, the Russians were able to …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

That is why no one takes you HBs seriously. You can’t get your stories straight. We see HBs saying robotic probes put the laser reflectors on the Moon… and then other HBs who say the lasers were simply reflected off …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

You can reflect a laser off the moon’s surface.
No reflector required.

True, but a lot more of the laser’s light is reflected when a reflector is used. The reflectors reflect all light back in the direction it came from. Light reflected …