Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence by jfb.

“To return to the Moon you would need to design a new spacecraft capable of getting there. It is expensive and you would have to convince the US Congress (who controls NASAs budget) that it is worth the cost.”

This is what the late, not-terribly-lamented Constellation project was all about; the Ares boosters, the Orion spacecraft, and the Altair lunar lander. Unfortunately, the program was unsustainable at current funding levels.

More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence by jfb


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

The blueprints *weren’t* destroyed; they’re on file at the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, AL. Not that it matters; we couldn’t build the Saturn V today if we wanted to, because most of the technology it used is …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

Now let me prove to NASA how stupid they are.

Ah, proof. Would that more people understood what constituted “proof”. “You can’t explain that” isn’t proof, especially when, yes, we can explain it.

The most powerful telescope on earth can’t …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

This question has been answered several times by myself and others, but it basically boils down to 3 things, mainly:

1. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. Everything boils down to money, as in, too goddamned much of. Manned lunar missions are fiendishly …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

Which tests? Citations, please.

The following report has been discussed elsewhere in the thread: http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/CR188427.pdf

Here was the conclusion:

The effects of radiation for STS-48 are apparent in the final images produced
by the high speed (above 400 ASA) flight …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

However, they show flame even from a large distance. The NASA videos show no flame from a close distance

What do you mean by “large distance” and “close distance”? Are you talking about altitude?

My point with the Falcon …


More Comments by jfb


Who panned the camera?

His name was Ed Fendell, a controller in Houston in charge the remotely-controlled camera on the LRV.

Yes, he had to take the signal delay into account – he had to anticipate the liftoff and rate of ascent. …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax

It doesn’t have to be pretty to work.

The foil acted as a thermal blanket, reflecting as much of the sunlight as possible to keep the base of the LM from overheating. The foil was only about 125 microns thick, …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

The blueprints *weren’t* destroyed; they’re on file at the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, AL. Not that it matters; we couldn’t build the Saturn V today if we wanted to, because most of the technology it used is …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

Did you know that many of the people involved in the moon landing died from a car crash?

Upwards of 90 people die *every day* in car crashes in the US; it’s not at all surprising that a lot people “involved …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Camera Problems

It’s not a C, it’s an O.

And it *looks* like some kind of inclusion (a pebble embedded in a slightly softer matrix rock). It looks like the surrounding matrix has eroded a bit, leaving a small channel around the …