Comments on: Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence

By: PaulD

PaulD — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:45:31 +0000

I’m not convinced that the moon landings were fake but I saw a video were you can clearly see what looks like wires connected to the astronauts. Does anyone know of an explanation for this. A lot of other inconsistencies can be explained but I can’t find anything that explains the wires. If anyone has any info on this I would appreciate it.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: william swithin

william swithin — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:50:45 +0000

All I am asking for proof is for the Americans to show us, close up, crystal clear, non blured, non grainy photos of the foloowing. 1/ the American flag with all its colours.2/ the moon buggy, 3/ The abandoned landing craft, Oh and one thing I only thought of today, If they went to the moon 5 times shouldn’t there be 5 abandoned landing craft up there. Having just done a sweep of the moon, the same as the Japanese Selen they should be able to show us. That is if they are there of course. Despite very clear photo’s from Selen, not one scrap of eveidence.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 1 (-1)

By: stendek

stendek — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:03:27 +0000

Right here (http://hubpages.com/hub/NASA-Moon-Hoax-Rocks-With-Writing-On-Them). Peace.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: stendek

stendek — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:54:52 +0000

Exceptional site. Sorry I have not noticed it before now. I am a conspiracist. I was an investigative reporter for decades before eyesight failed.

Never thought much about fake moon landing until Edwin Aldrin sucker punched an American citizen in an unprovoked attack then received a pat on the back from corrupt American legal system.

Foolishly accepted NASA claims on faith alone. I was naive teenager in 1969. Actions by this astro-not caused me to examine possibility that the moon landings were just flights of fancy.

My focus went from federal government sponsored domestic assassinations (JFK, RFK, MLK, John Lennon) and 911 official fantasy (federal government sanctioned 911 report pure fiction paid for by wasted tax dollars) to moon. All pseudo scientific balderdash compiled by folks with personal agendas.

No Elizabeth, Americans never landed on the moon. Astro-nots under secrecy oaths. Many citizens/astro-nots who did blow whistle or attempt to do so are in final resting places (http://hubpages.com/hub/NASA-Mirder-On-Pad-34).

Reason for hoax? Suppose president proclaimed that USA WOULD land on moon when though technology was not available at that time (as now) to do so? Delay at first. Then thoughts of unaccounted billions of taxpayer dollars for project magically overcome technology problem. Many hoaxes can be and have been staged for a lot less money!

Know what really bothers me? Rest of world already knows NASA and astro-nots like old sucker punch presented a piece of wood to the Dutch people as a genuine moon rock (http://hubpages.com/hub/NASA-Moon-Hoax-Exposed-With-Commentary).

This is fully verified. Why has NASA never been brought to task for this national disgrace? Where is the accountability? Righteous indignation? Oh well. Thanks again for forum. Peace.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 1 (-1)

By: Veronica

Veronica — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:34:01 +0000

RE:FLAT EARTH SOCIETY…That’s an easy one…God said the earth was round thousands of years ago If our predecessors would have only read Isaiah 40:22 “It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:”
It was there all along.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 4 3 (+1)

By: STMan

STMan — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:52:46 +0000

Here’s some answers to your questions.

Question: Who filmed Armstrong as he took his first steps: Answer: No one. Armstrong pulled on a D-ring, which deployed a black & white video camera which was stored in the instrument bay.

Question: How did they send their signal from the moon. Answer: The moon is close relative to Mars, Jupiter, Saturn and the other planets that unmanned probes have been to. All of which can send a strong enough signal for the large parabolic antennaes back on Earth to receive. So the signal was easy to pick up from the relatively close distance of the moon.

Question: How did they take of their helmets to eat and drink. Answer: They only could take of their helmets when they were inside the lunar module, which was pressurized with oxygen, so that they could breath without their helmets on.

Question: Didn’t the lunar rover run a long time without charging. Answer: The longest was apollo 17, which logged 4 hours and 26 min. But remember, it did this as a very light vehicle in one sixth gravity.

Question: Would it not take 10 times as long to get back to Earth: Answer: No. When the command module engines were fired to get them out of lunar orbit and send them back to earth, the Earths gravity was used to accelerate the craft as it headed back. It picked up speed just as any object does when it falls to Earth. Also because most of the fuel was used on the way there, there was not as much mass for the engines to accelerate.

Other comments: There was unmanned missions to the moon before the astronauts risked their lives. To say they faked the footage shows that you haven’t looked at all of the evidence. The moon landing were shown live on TV, with the astronauts communicating with ground control in Houston. The transmissions were listened to by several countries around the world, including the Soviet Union, who reported about the 1st moon landing on page one of Pravda, their govermnent controlled news paper. As well, the apollo missions were tracked by Britain and Austrailian astronomers, who used their large parabolic antanneas to listen to the communications. If they had not gone, there would have been no transmissions.

So why don’t they go now? Isn’t technology better now? First the fact that they don’t go now isn’t proof that they never went, but there is plans for a new heavy lifting rocket which can return astronauts to the moon in about 10 or 12 years if the schedule is kept. Currently it isn’t possible to go since the Saturn V rocket was discontinued, and replaced by the reusable space shuttle, which is only for low Earth orbit.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 2 2 (0)

By: i cant believe you people

i cant believe you people — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:13:10 +0000

wow……really? did you ever take time to realize that the ground the astronauts are standing on are at different elevations due to the various topography? go watch mythbusters shadows they actually explain it pretty well, i just had to post this cuz i couldnt let you people go on being to ignorant, but please go do research before being another group of idiot CT’s.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 2 2 (0)

By: Sally

Sally — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:34:37 +0000

I find some comments extremely interesting, others amusing and then there are those that are just plain ludicrous… but all-in-all, entertaining. Anyone care to comment on the Flat Earth Society? If the moon landing was a hoax, then who’s to say that the earth is indeed round?

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 1 2 (-1)

By: norman

norman — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:22:03 +0000

Sorry but they did not go to the moon. Recent investigations into the film footage and photographic material clearly shows a hoax. The light given of the surface of the moon is only approximately 7% as can been seen when you examine photos and shadows of moon rocks. Yet oddly enough pictures taken in shadow of the crew leaving the landing craft appear to be very well illuminated. As they openly admit, no external extra lighting was taken with them, where did this light souse come from. Hoax debunker’s always appear to select aspects which are reasonably easy to counter. but are careful to avoid aspects which are incontrovertible. Check out the cross hires built into the camera’s and in some shots you notice the cross hair is behind the object being pictured this is an impossibility! Mountains being moved between one set and another, further clear evidence of a hoax.The list goes on and on. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQj-Mh__fRc&feature=related There is far more to this film which goes on for near 2 hours. Heres where we find the truth

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 4 2 (+2)

By: Alex Shandor

Alex Shandor — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:30:02 +0000

I find that the people who do not believe the NASA story are generally better educated, but it is more important that they are INDEPENDENT thinkers.
Many of the Apollo Moon photos have the stars in them if you lighten up the image.
A good example is AS15-85-11425HR.
You can get this image from NASA archive:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-85-11425HR.jpg
You can do it even with Widows Photo Gallery: Click on FIX, Adjust Exposure, then adjust Brightness and Contrast. (You may have to do it twice so as to see the stars.)
Then you can compare it with my version, I did only the right hand side half, sky portion:
http://members.shaw.ca/alex11/moonhoax/img/15-85-11425.jpg
You may also browse My site for more evidence of hoax:
http://members.shaw.ca/alex11/moonhoax/
All the images with the Astronauts and the LM are faked. Some other images appear the be genuine, they were taken probably on the Moon by the Surveyor spacecrafts.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 2 2 (0)