Comments on: Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence

By: yasmin

yasmin — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:43:09 +0000

I have lots of proof that all of this is a hoax, such as…

There can’t be any pictures taken on the Moon because the film would melt as the temperature was 250°. However, at these times we could do stuff like that, but ages ago when this all happened, they didn’t have the technology to prevent the camera from melting.

The likelihood of success was calculated to be so small that it is inconceivable the moon landings could have actually taken place!

The black sky should be full of stars, yet none are visible!

Some Apollo photographs show mysterious lights in the shadowy background that appear to be studio spotlights!

there is soooo MUCH more but I cant be bothered to write them down… :/

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: bob

bob — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:27:56 +0000

the moon landing was real muthbusters said so yeah!!!!!!!”!!!!!!!!!!

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: Johnny bob

Johnny bob — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:32:05 +0000

You are an example of how stupid American is. Americans did not come up with “creationism,” and this is all over the world! This just shows how ignorant you are; so ignorant of other counties you think only the US practices creationism!

Creationism has a large science and historical base the same as Dwarfism. They are both theories but they are both great, well supported, and logical theories that I do not find stupid in any way.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: Johnny bob

Johnny bob — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 04:49:08 +0000

Dude this was on Mythbusters, you dipshits. It’s already been proven that this argument is invalid and that this image is most-likely legit.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: Mack

Mack — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 03:28:59 +0000

I don’t know if we went or not! I side with the conspiracy theorists because uniformitarians are a pack of arrogant cunts! Mostly fat ugly slobs and dorky white dudes with pimples and huge nerd glasses!

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 2 (-2)

By: Joe

Joe — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:11:45 +0000

If we can launch shuttles, sattelites, and intercontinental missles out of Geosynchronous orbit (these things have been clearly proved by unrefuted data). Also, we can clearly launch humans into space. Proved by hundreds if not thousands of unrefutable missions. Then, what is two stop us from going to the moon? The answer is very little. Once we are past this point the shuttle can basically cruze on to the moon with little gravity resistance and little to know molecular resistance due to their rareified state. All that is needed now is a navigational system and too be able to keep going straight. The first has been proved effective by use of earth based tracking system and space based ones on non-human missions. As for going straight all that is needed is a gyroscope. Now to legitimately land on the moon the technology is very low tech for NASA. All that is required is a small ship with the poower to get from the craft to the moon and back. This technology is about the simplest thing imaginable. To refute the possiblity would be insanity. Then they just need to power back to earth, which is again easy due to lack of gravity and rarefied molecules. Finally, they simply need to reenter earths atmoshpere. For this a simple shielding layer can be used. This final piece has been proved time and time again.
All the steps apart are simple, logical, and proved possible.

I realize this isn’t an exact description, but I was trying to simplify it. For a more accurate and complete description visit nasa.gov/

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 1 3 (-2)

By: Joe

Joe — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:54:03 +0000

I agree with Grimjaw. Plus, didn’t we already have this Mythbusters?

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 1 2 (-1)

By: Grimjaw

Grimjaw — Mon, 15 Aug 2011 06:46:38 +0000

The stupidity of Americans never ceases to amuse.

Forget the physical aspects of the hoax for a moment and think of the political aspects. Do you seriously think the other nations during the space race would keep quiet if USA faked the landings?

Only in America do you get things like “moon landing conspiracy” and “creationism”.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 5 4 (+1)

By: Ty

Ty — Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:23:45 +0000

Forget it…nasa will never tell the truth about UFOs, moon, mars, etc…we are on our own. Govts only want contact with aliens for weapon sciences so they can make wars and money at the price of blood. The moon landings made money and fooled the world into thinking we had the tech. to go which we do not today even. Why cant everyone see this lie?

Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think? 8 15 (-7)

By: LunarOrbit

LunarOrbit — Sun, 15 May 2011 05:35:20 +0000

My main concern is that if they really did land on the moon in 1969, then why was there not a single attempt to repeat the feat

Ummm… NASA landed men on the Moon five more times after Apollo 11.

Don’t we have the technology…

There are no major technical obstacles to going to the Moon. NASA just needs to build a new spacecraft and heavy-lift rocket to replace the Space Shuttles first.

…or the willingness to do it now.

Bingo. You just hit the nail on the head. Going to the Moon is very expensive and a lot of people don’t understand the benefits of doing it so they don’t see the point. Without support from the taxpayers and the politicians NASA can’t fund anything as expensive as missions to the Moon.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 1 0 (+1)