Another problem with the moon landing photos can be seen in the next two Apollo images below. Several astronauts seem to be lit up, as […]
Continue Reading Moon Landing Hoax
K maa the kuss paye chudwande o twaadi maa de mammy choos k khali karan penchodo ik kam kita ninga ne te kede kion wo
IF YOU WANT TO FIGHT ABOUT IT HIT MY EMAIL UP WE WILL DEBATE THE LANDING WAS A HOAX JUST GET IT OVER WITH TYLORWENZEL@WI.RR.COM IS MY EMAIL AND I AM ALBERT EINSTEIN THE BEST MIND… SO ALL BOW DOWN AND BELIEVE IN THE 666
Moon landing was real Nuff Said.
Congratulations, you just singlehandedly converted all of the retards with one simple sentence. You can now live out the rest of your days with the warm fuzzy feeling that you made all the difference.
If anyone doubts the credibility of this or ANY hoax then you need to wake up and smell the roses. We are being lied to right and left by the media and the government! Just because it’s on TV, Radio or in print DOES NOT make it the gospel. Any doubters should really take into consideration what other’s notice, they very well may have seen something your eyes have not caught. Just as the CNN gulf war reporting hoax. Pay attention, give it some open thought. Don’t be fooled by the people turning us into puppets.
I believe the Apollo moon landings were real – this does not mean I take everything said about it being real and hold it on a pedestal. I find many conspiracies are tautological, and therefore void in their arguments. I always look for clear evidence that can be verified before believing any conspiracy theory or reason for the moon landings being real. At the minute, the burden of the evidence lies with the moon landings being real (where would you place a set (for the moon landings being ‘filmed’ in a ‘studio’) that large without someone noticing it?) so therefore I go with that theory. So I did give it some open thought as you suggested, and reached a different conclusion to you. Why are you having a go at people for having a different opinion to you? You can say you believe it’s a conspiracy – that’s fine by me. I find it despicable that you seek the need to try to convert EVERYONE into thinking the moon landings are fake. That isn’t open thought, which you seem to hold in high esteem.
>>If anyone doubts the credibility of this or ANY hoax then you need to wake up and smell the roses. We are being lied to right and left by the media and the government! Just because it’s on TV, Radio or in print DOES NOT make it the gospel. Any doubters should really take into consideration what other’s notice, they very well may have seen something your eyes have not caught. Just as the CNN gulf war reporting hoax. Pay attention, give it some open thought. Don’t be fooled by the people turning us into puppets.
Anything can be questioned but it doesn’t make everything false. You’re falling sucker to them and you call us puppets. Anything can be made to seem true by poking holes at any natural fact and by throwing in a few definitions.
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof
You are a fucking idiot.
You people are pathetic morons. What about the Bigfoot and Loch Ness monster cover up? We need to focus on issues here at on earth, never mind the moon. Assholes.
They only lie to you. By the way, you don’t really exist.
what about the dust from the tires and their feet. particles that small would surely not fall back to the surface in an environment with little to no gravity.
Gravity on the Moon is 1/6th as strong as it is on Earth, but it does exist. So the dust would fall to the ground a little bit slower on the Moon, but it would fall. Also, gravity affects all objects equally, it doesn’t matter how big or small they are. A hammer and feather fall at the same speed when there is no atmosphere to slow the feather.
The dust kicked up by the astronauts and the rovers actually proves that they were on the Moon because it follows a ballistic path (an arc) rather than billowing into clouds like it would in an atmosphere like on Earth.
Lunar surface gravity is 1.63 m/s^2, or not quite 17% of what you’d feel on the surface of the Earth.
Plenty strong enough to pull down even the lightest dust particles. They travel farther after being kicked up than they would in Earth normal gravity, but they’d still fall to the surface fairly quickly.
You are an idiot!
“Little or no gravity”…..fucking idiot. The moon has gravity,83.3% less than Earth. So, if any matter has mass, it will fall back to the moons surface. The astronauts aren’t floating away, are they? So, of course, the dust will settle, dumbfuck!
Gravity is directly proportional to mass. The Moon has mass. Read a book retard. And stop listening to your brother Pid.
We have to thank Microsoft and Apple for made it possible for people with little or no brains to be able to use computers and write therir so great thoughts…
moon landing was not fixed as you thought
I know the 1969 moon landing was on tv 2 years before I was born and acording to history nasa had the astronauts bring the cameras on bord. even ask nasa but who are we to judge or blame one another? when we can’t even blame anyone. ken mcvay
Who’s blaming who what?
Years ago I recall seeing a photo of a reflection in the visor of a man in a short sleeved shirt squatting down, evidently on the edge of the stage set. This was in the beginning of the hoax theory coming to light. I no longer can find this photo. Anyone know what happened to this photo?
I have a friend of a friend that knew a girl that blew a NASA guy that says he saw something once.
My best answer to rrc’s question (above):
NASA image: AS17-141-21608HR from: http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21608HR.jpg
The magnified helmet of AS17-141-21608HR
Who took the picture? The person (stage worker) in the helmet’s reflection does not have a camera and he is not facing in the right direction. After that, it seems to be only a minor detail that the Astronaut in the reflection does not have “life support” on his back. Magnify the picture and many Disney Land features on the rocks will be obvious. NASA believers call this scientific/photographic evidence, but what is it proving?
rrc, I also have a question for you: What do you see on the images and what is wrong with these images: AS15-87-11695, AS15-87-11697, AS15-87-11698, AS15-87-11699 ?
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11696HR.jpg http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11695HR.jpg http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11697HR.jpg http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11698HR.jpg
Moon Landing Hoax
I hear Santa was in the vicinity during that time.
Who took the picture? The person (stage worker) in the helmet’s reflection does not have a camera and he is not facing in the right direction. After that, it seems to be only a minor detail that the Astronaut in the reflection does not have “life support” on his back.
See, this is what I’m talking about. People obsess over weird reflections in the visors and call that “proof” that the whole thing was a hoax, when all it proves is that they can’t see very well.
It is the other astronaut, face on; the shadow down the front is from the chest-mounted camera. If you look at the shadow he casts on the ground, it very strongly suggests the outline of a space suit with a PLSS.
moonlandinghoaxtards. Can anyone think of something more catchy?
NASA image: AS17-141-21608HR from: http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21608HR.jpg (Who took the picture? The person -stage worker- in the helmet’s reflection does not have a camera on his chest and a life support system on his back, and he is not facing in the right direction to take the picture.) I do not except shade arguments from either side (believers or sceptics). If I did then I would consider it completely proven that NO Astronaut ever landed on the Moon. Why I don’t believe in the shade arguments? One day I was hiking out for climbing in the Rocky Mountains and kept watching my shade. I often stopped and analysed the shade. Even when I was there and could examine all the facts it was often difficult to explain the geometry of my shade…. The following video agrees with your (jfb above) explanation but at the same time shows the difficulties involved.
What is interesting is how well your imagination works jfb when to “fill in” a picture so as to make it a believable Moon landing evidence. I bet however, you do not see any of the Disneyland features on the same image. Your imagination suddenly takes a dive ?)
AS15-87-11695, AS15-87-11696, AS15-87-11697, AS15-87-11698, AS15-87-11699 jfb, what do you see on these images and is there anything wrong with these images: http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11696HR.jpg http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11695HR.jpg http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11697HR.jpg http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11698HR.jpg http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11698HR.jpg Maybe, just maybe this will be a more clear case.