Another problem with the moon landing photos can be seen in the next two Apollo images below.
Several astronauts seem to be lit up, as if they were standing in a spot light, even though they are in a large shadow on the moon!
Many moon landing hoax debunking theories have been made to explain this. The most popular explanation is the Earth gives off its own light that highlights the astronauts. But if the Earth gave off that much light, then a shadow would appear behind each person, and there would be multiple shadows in every moon photo. The Earth does give off some light but not enough to hi-light.
Instead, this anomaly is due to the reflectiveness of the moon. The sun light hits the moons surface, and reflects onto the astronaut ‘hi-lighting’ him.
This also happens on Earth. When you wear a white top in the sunlight, – even if you have a cap that forms a shadow – your face will still be lit up by the reflective sun light, when it hits the reflective surface of your white t-shirt.
Conspiracy believers also think that many of the moon landing photos have been doctored. This is because the quality of the photos are constant with every picture. All of the photos are focused and every thing is in view.
This at the time was a remarkable feat, as the cameras were attached to the astronauts chests (see next image) so the astronauts couldn’t see where they were shooting on the moon or whether the picture was focused properly.
If this was true then it would be suspicious. But simple sifting through files shows the real story. NASA wouldn’t print a moon photo took by Buzz if he chopped off the top of Neil’s head. And it definitely wouldn’t appear on the cover of The New Scientist magazine.
At the time it was costly to develop photos, so NASA wouldn’t waste money on faulty photos. The same as you and I wouldn’t show all of the faulty photos, to our friends. But now vast libraries can be put online for free, so all of the faulty photos can be seen in all there glory.
See our Apollo Moon Landing Forum.
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Camera Problems
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Video Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?
211 responses to Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
K maa the kuss paye chudwande o twaadi maa de mammy choos k khali karan penchodo ik kam kita ninga ne te kede kion wo
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
6 (-5)
IF YOU WANT TO FIGHT ABOUT IT HIT MY EMAIL UP WE WILL DEBATE THE LANDING WAS A HOAX JUST GET IT OVER WITH TYLORWENZEL@WI.RR.COM IS MY EMAIL AND I AM ALBERT EINSTEIN THE BEST MIND… SO ALL BOW DOWN AND BELIEVE IN THE 666
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
3 
10 (-7)
Moon landing was real Nuff Said.
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
4 
6 (-2)
Congratulations, you just singlehandedly converted all of the retards with one simple sentence.
You can now live out the rest of your days with the warm fuzzy feeling that you made all the difference.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Wake up
If anyone doubts the credibility of this or ANY hoax then you need to wake up and smell the roses. We are being lied to right and left by the media and the government! Just because it’s on TV, Radio or in print DOES NOT make it the gospel. Any doubters should really take into consideration what other’s notice, they very well may have seen something your eyes have not caught. Just as the CNN gulf war reporting hoax. Pay attention, give it some open thought. Don’t be fooled by the people turning us into puppets.
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
7 
6 (+1)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
@Shannon
I believe the Apollo moon landings were real -- this does not mean I take everything said about it being real and hold it on a pedestal. I find many conspiracies are tautological, and therefore void in their arguments. I always look for clear evidence that can be verified before believing any conspiracy theory or reason for the moon landings being real. At the minute, the burden of the evidence lies with the moon landings being real (where would you place a set (for the moon landings being ‘filmed’ in a ‘studio’) that large without someone noticing it?) so therefore I go with that theory. So I did give it some open thought as you suggested, and reached a different conclusion to you. Why are you having a go at people for having a different opinion to you? You can say you believe it’s a conspiracy -- that’s fine by me. I find it despicable that you seek the need to try to convert EVERYONE into thinking the moon landings are fake. That isn’t open thought, which you seem to hold in high esteem.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
3 
0 (+3)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
>>If anyone doubts the credibility of this or ANY hoax then you need to wake up and smell the roses. We are being lied to right and left by the media and the government! Just because it’s on TV, Radio or in print DOES NOT make it the gospel. Any doubters should really take into consideration what other’s notice, they very well may have seen something your eyes have not caught. Just as the CNN gulf war reporting hoax. Pay attention, give it some open thought. Don’t be fooled by the people turning us into puppets.
Anything can be questioned but it doesn’t make everything false. You’re falling sucker to them and you call us puppets. Anything can be made to seem true by poking holes at any natural fact and by throwing in a few definitions.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
2 
0 (+2)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
You are a fucking idiot.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
1 (-1)
You people are pathetic morons. What about the Bigfoot and Loch Ness monster cover up? We need to focus on issues here at on earth, never mind the moon. Assholes.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
3 (-3)
They only lie to you. By the way, you don’t really exist.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
what about the dust from the tires and their feet. particles that small would surely not fall back to the surface in an environment with little to no gravity.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
3 (-3)
Gravity on the Moon is 1/6th as strong as it is on Earth, but it does exist. So the dust would fall to the ground a little bit slower on the Moon, but it would fall. Also, gravity affects all objects equally, it doesn’t matter how big or small they are. A hammer and feather fall at the same speed when there is no atmosphere to slow the feather.
The dust kicked up by the astronauts and the rovers actually proves that they were on the Moon because it follows a ballistic path (an arc) rather than billowing into clouds like it would in an atmosphere like on Earth.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
4 
0 (+4)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
Lunar surface gravity is 1.63 m/s^2, or not quite 17% of what you’d feel on the surface of the Earth.
Plenty strong enough to pull down even the lightest dust particles. They travel farther after being kicked up than they would in Earth normal gravity, but they’d still fall to the surface fairly quickly.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
2 
0 (+2)
You are an idiot!
“Little or no gravity”…..fucking idiot. The moon has gravity,83.3% less than Earth. So, if any matter has mass, it will fall back to the moons surface. The astronauts aren’t floating away, are they? So, of course, the dust will settle, dumbfuck!
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
1 (0)
Gravity is directly proportional to mass.
The Moon has mass.
Read a book retard.
And stop listening to your brother Pid.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
0 (+1)
We have to thank Microsoft and Apple for made it possible for people with little or no brains to be able to use computers and write therir so great thoughts…
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
moon landing was not fixed as you thought
I know the 1969 moon landing was on tv
2 years before I was born and acording to history
nasa had the astronauts bring the cameras on
bord. even ask nasa but who are we to judge or blame
one another? when we can’t even blame anyone.
ken mcvay
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
1 (-1)
Who’s blaming who what?
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
Missing photo
Years ago I recall seeing a photo of a reflection in the visor
of a man in a short sleeved shirt squatting down, evidently on the edge of the stage set. This was in the beginning of the hoax theory coming to light.
I no longer can find this photo. Anyone know what happened to this photo?
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
4 
3 (+1)
I have a friend of a friend that knew a girl that blew a NASA guy that says he saw something once.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
0 (+1)
My best answer to rrc’s question (above):
NASA image: AS17-141-21608HR from:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21608HR.jpg
The magnified helmet of AS17-141-21608HR
Who took the picture? The person (stage worker) in the helmet’s reflection does not have a camera and he is not facing in the right direction. After that, it seems to be only a minor detail that the Astronaut in the reflection does not have “life support” on his back.
Magnify the picture and many Disney Land features on the rocks will be obvious.
NASA believers call this scientific/photographic evidence, but what is it proving?
rrc, I also have a question for you: What do you see on the images and what is wrong with these images:
AS15-87-11695, AS15-87-11697, AS15-87-11698, AS15-87-11699 ?
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11696HR.jpg
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11695HR.jpg
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11697HR.jpg
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11698HR.jpg
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
1 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
I hear Santa was in the vicinity during that time.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
0 (0)
See, this is what I’m talking about. People obsess over weird reflections in the visors and call that “proof” that the whole thing was a hoax, when all it proves is that they can’t see very well.
It is the other astronaut, face on; the shadow down the front is from the chest-mounted camera. If you look at the shadow he casts on the ground, it very strongly suggests the outline of a space suit with a PLSS.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
2 
0 (+2)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
moonlandinghoaxtards. Can anyone think of something more catchy?
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
0 (+1)
NASA image: AS17-141-21608HR from:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21608HR.jpg
(Who took the picture? The person -stage worker- in the helmet’s reflection does not have a camera on his chest and a life support system on his back, and he is not facing in the right direction to take the picture.)
I do not except shade arguments from either side (believers or sceptics). If I did then I would consider it completely proven that NO Astronaut ever landed on the Moon. Why I don’t believe in the shade arguments? One day I was hiking out for climbing in the Rocky Mountains and kept watching my shade. I often stopped and analysed the shade. Even when I was there and could examine all the facts it was often difficult to explain the geometry of my shade….
The following video agrees with your (jfb above) explanation but at the same time shows the difficulties involved.
What is interesting is how well your imagination works jfb when to “fill in” a picture so as to make it a believable Moon landing evidence. I bet however, you do not see any of the Disneyland features on the same image. Your imagination suddenly takes a dive ?)
AS15-87-11695, AS15-87-11696, AS15-87-11697, AS15-87-11698, AS15-87-11699
jfb, what do you see on these images and is there anything wrong with these images:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11696HR.jpg
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11695HR.jpg
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11697HR.jpg
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11698HR.jpg
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-87-11698HR.jpg
Maybe, just maybe this will be a more clear case.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
1 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
Leave a reply to Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence