Another problem with the moon landing photos can be seen in the next two Apollo images below. Several astronauts seem to be lit up, as […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof
Another problem with the moon landing photos can be seen in the next two Apollo images below. Several astronauts seem to be lit up, as […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof
1. You can not see ANY Apollo landing site with ANY telescope. Not even Hubble can get that close. – Do some actual research before telling people to buy a telescope.
2. The illumination from the surface of the moon is equal to that of common asphalt here on Earth. (do this experiment) Stand on asphalt at night with a giant spotlight far behind you (like the sun). From the front, you will be nothing but a silhouette! So the idea that Astronauts with the sun behind them are lit from the front by the moon’s surface is FALSE. Illumination Proof – DEBUNKED
3. Laser reflector on the moon. The Soviets put them on the moon with unmanned missions, so this is debunked too. Also, the moon’s surface itself would act as a reflector. Reflector Proof – DEBUNKED
4. Moon rocks – Again, moon rocks can be brought back with unmanned missions and have been. They say the number collected is too great, HOWEVER, I have seen a moon rock, it was encased in about 6 inches of round glass. It could have been ceramic for all I know. The FACT that not all rocks were examined by independant geologists and that NASA controls the samples given leave the question of doubt. (I’m not even getting into the Vaun Braun expedition to Antarctica) Moon Rocks Proof – DEBUNKED
It seems the last remaining “Proofs” Pro Apollo people have can be debunked with plausible thought.
They still can explain why the rate the moon dirt falls is faster than the rate an astronaut falls (which defies Newton’s Laws of Physics which are UNIVERSAL)… Perhaps it’s because their is resistance keeping that astronaut from falling at the same rate (like wires?)
View Comment
@ Hardy:
“1. You can not see ANY Apollo landing site with ANY telescope. Not even Hubble can get that close. – Do some actual research before telling people to buy a telescope.”
This is true. To resolve an object the size of a LM descent stage from Earth distance, you would need a telescope with an objective on the order of 25 meters (if I’ve done the math right). It’s pretty safe to say that we’re never going to directly image the Apollo landing sites using equipment on Earth or in Earth orbit.
“2. The illumination from the surface of the moon is equal to that of common asphalt here on Earth. (do this experiment) Stand on asphalt at night with a giant spotlight far behind you (like the sun). From the front, you will be nothing but a silhouette! So the idea that Astronauts with the sun behind them are lit from the front by the moon’s surface is FALSE. Illumination Proof – DEBUNKED”
It’s not just the Moon’s surface, though; the astronauts are wearing these big white reflectors. There’s more than enough illumination provided by the reflection from the space suits to fill in shadows.
“3. Laser reflector on the moon. The Soviets put them on the moon with unmanned missions, so this is debunked too. Also, the moon’s surface itself would act as a reflector. Reflector Proof – DEBUNKED”
The lunar surface is a Lambertian reflector, and the reflected laser pulse would be too diffuse to detect from the Earth’s surface. No, there has to be a mirror of some sort on the lunar surface.
“4. Moon rocks – Again, moon rocks can be brought back with unmanned missions and have been. They say the number collected is too great, HOWEVER, I have seen a moon rock, it was encased in about 6 inches of round glass. It could have been ceramic for all I know. The FACT that not all rocks were examined by independant geologists and that NASA controls the samples given leave the question of doubt. (I’m not even getting into the Vaun Braun expedition to Antarctica) Moon Rocks Proof – DEBUNKED”
As expensive as those suckers are, they’re not going to be handed over to just anyone to examine.
“It seems the last remaining “Proofs” Pro Apollo people have can be debunked with plausible thought.
They still can explain why the rate the moon dirt falls is faster than the rate an astronaut falls (which defies Newton’s Laws of Physics which are UNIVERSAL)… Perhaps it’s because their is resistance keeping that astronaut from falling at the same rate (like wires?)”
From all the video I’ve seen, I haven’t seen anything like what you describe. Can you point me to a specific video that exhibits what you’re talking about?
View Comment
By the way, the hoax was filmed in 3 locations (and not the desert!)
1. Langley, Virgina
2. Mauna Kea, Hawaii (at the summit) — TAKE A LOOK!
3. Monument Valley in Southern Utah
I would like to know how they managed to keep insects and other life forms that the desert is full of from accidently getting into any of the videos. Conspiracy theorists act like the three stooges must have created the hoax because they seem to point out every aspect of the missions to be wrong. They should have hired conspiracy theorists for the hoax since they know everything about lighting and gravity.
What I have noticed over time is the people who belive we went there have no evidence at all to support that we did go there. It is logisticly and physicly impossible. There is one video of the astronauts jumping next to LM
Again, Myth busters.
Dare to grow a brain.
Leave the thinking to people that are equipped to do it. You’re doing a fine job transferring petroleum.
dear hardy. Go back to school, Why would you use hubble anyway. Thats like a nuke to remove a tooth. The landing site is there. For all you know. The hubble cant see a house on earth. It wasnt designed for it.that why we got lansats. Anyway i say they did land. Do i know. no. Do you. No. but i say see for yourself. Instead of foolish debunks. The whole moon landing hoax is much of a joke as your ideas. 3 sites ya rite. Why would Nasa even need to fake a moon landing. The russians werent even close. Oh yeah they had their own shuttles. But not the know how.
If Neil Armstrong was the first on the moon. Who was video taking
his picture? Like NASA said. The cameras were attached to the
astronaut. Not remotely controlled.
Americans make movies they make special affects. we all know they want to be the best and the biggest. so they have to make a movie to fool us. its simple.
Yeah we faked them there Moon landings. I can’t believe people could be stupid to think we landed on the Moon. Intense radiation prevents any space travel outside of Earth orbit.
The whole universe is to complex. We don’t yet know what the matter actually is. We don’t know the nature of the magnetic electric and gravity fields – we only observe the behavior and interactions and their dependencies on the bodies creating those fields. We can only guess what exactly those fields are. There are lot of theories but none of them proven so far. So basically we don’t understand in details any of the things surrounding us – so using your logic – the universe and we just do not exist. Oh man, it was so simple – if your brain cannot wrap something instead of trying to explain it just reject it – it doesn’t exist. So you can imagine that if the people were not smarter than you we would be still living in caves. And about the radiation – again you know nothing about it. As I explained as a response to one other question – read something about it. The ionizing radiation has three main components. The one which cannot be stopped from the space suites or space craft shell (it requires tick lead layers) is called Gamma ray. The Gamma rays (electromagnetic waves with >10 exahertz frequency) are the ones which pass through the matter and are pretty hard to stop. What protects us here on Earth is our atmosphere. The Gamma rays are getting absorbed from the tick and multiple atmosphere layers. So the Gamma rays intensity is pretty much the same in the Earths orbit, into the Van Allen’s belt and also on the Moon. The Alpha (stream of Helium cores) and Beta (high energy high speed electrons) are pretty much easily absorbed/deflected by a thin dense metal – of course it depends on the intensity on those shells. But you can imagine that we sent hundreds of probes and satellites all around the Solar system even we have some which passed outside the boundaries of this system. Yes the living matter is a lot more vulnerable to the radiation than the electronics systems but again – the Gamma rays are the one that are hard to stop and again – the same in the Earth’s orbit, Van Allen’s belt and on the Moon. So obviously the radiation may not be a big problem as you can think. And why you think that the radiation outside the Earth’s orbit is an unsolvable problem at first place – because you know nothing about it, that’s why. In your mind the radiation is something that is marked whit this triangle kind of sign and means everything in 5 miles (at least) radios from whenever this sign is posted dies. Well when I’m thinking now what it needs to make someone a fool is this one to be half educated and person and having high self esteem. People like that, one can make them believe in whatever they want. Just like you. You should start learning more about geometry, radiation, photography, gravity laws, fluid’s mechanics etc. Once you start understanding all of these things, you’ll know why all of the Moon landing hoax is ridiculous.
View Comment
Do you know how many people work at NASA? Do you know how many people it takes to make a movie? Even if “the insiders” were lying to the rest of the engineers, technicians, researchers, controllers, janitors – how are they going to keep all those people quiet for THIS long? Someone would peep.
Oh c’mon, keeping a huge secret like this is not impossible, all you have to do is kill everybody involved. :)
Up until the early 1900’s it was ‘impossible’ to fly, today we can fly up to mach 7 (in the atmosphere) and flying is so common that most don’t even get excited over it anymore…
Now the hoaxers wants us to believe moon landings is ‘impossible’ – get out of your medieval cocoon – most things are possible, given enough time, thought and finances.
Armstrong became a Christian on the moon, will he dare to hoax that? To make a joke out of religion for ‘king and country’? I don’t think so.
Anyway, what is the point in faking it, and running the risk that sometime in the future some other nation will manage to do that and expose the false landings?
Kate, valid argument.