Another problem with the moon landing photos can be seen in the next two Apollo images below. Several astronauts seem to be lit up, as […]
Continue Reading Moon Landing Hoax
I have a picture of Edwin Aldrin’s visor that pictured by Armstrong in high res. You can see clearly that Armstrong is in a spot of bright light (sunlight?).
The whole picture is quite good in exposure, contrast and brightness, and the color balance etc.
But seeing the condition and position when taking that picture, there is a lot of strange happen.
Looking to the length of shadow and the angle, the light is coming from about 1 and 2 oclock in front and hand right of Armstrong, and a height of light is about 30 to 40 degree.
The conclusion, he and with his camera, is almost frontally hit by Direct Light Exposure without any hid or shade cover him!!!
If you go to my URL (edit by owner of blog: URL link didn’t work, can’t have spaces in there! so go to this image http://yovitadiah.bravehost.com/visor%20of%20edwin%20aldrin.jpg), I just pick up 2 of the basic theory that explain of “Avoiding Direct Light Exposure”
I just thinking that photo at least taking twice, and the helmet visor then copy paste to the other …
Moon Landing Hoax
well i’ve got a pic. of armstron next to the USA flag, and the flag is moving, that completely imposible, because there no wind in space.
Watch the episode of Mythbusters where they demonstrate why the flag is waving.
Read about inertia and zero air resistance.
ur the hoax!
1 the appolo13 pics wer black nd white btw 2 they wont interveiw armstrong on 60mins and not ask that Q? unless theyr sure of it 3 ok i dnt hav 2 think of 1 but i hope u kno that if they dd i bet the 12 ppl evr 2 go r vry offended
i will have to say to all the hoax believers out there. it is good to see you all keep such a close eye on whats going on. using your brains, not just taking someones word for what they have done. we need that to keep he liars in check. but if you were to stick to UFOs it would be much appresiated, and pleaze spend some of that cash you all make and buy a telescope and take a look at the moon and you will see the landing site for yourselfs. it still there and always will be. For the appollo 11 Crew.
Capitols to begin a sentence your, spelling sux worst than mine, punctuation, ur not even annoying enough to be intresting..
Ha Ha… sic
I seriously hope you don’t think you can see the equipment left behind on the moon using a telescope. The Clementine space craft that surveyed the moon had a maximum resolution of 100 meters per pixel. And it orbited at around 400 Km. You have a snowballs chance in hell of seeing that stuff from Earth using a telescope.
pleaze spend some of that cash you all make and buy a telescope and take a look at the moon and you will see the landing site for yourselfs.
Uh, no. No Earth-bound telescope can resolve the landing sites. Not even the Hubble can resolve the landing sites. They’re simply too small to see from a quarter of a million miles away.
This argument is bullshit. Any light coming from the opposite direction of the sun will come from light being reflected off the earth. Its a dumb arse theory
Remember, it was a day time the photos were taken. The Earth’s light is not the reason you see what you see. The second brightest light source (after the Sun) is the Moon’s illuminated surface. But anyway the whole idea of even discussing this is ridiculous. The whole hoax is based on false statements about “how the thighs should be” which are totally against the reality we know and we observe every single day. I just don’t know how come the people who believe we didn’t land to the Moon deny to open their eyes. From all of the arguments I see there are two conclusions: 1. We landed to the Moon. 2. We didn’t lend to the Moon but the way they present the things we see exactly match the reality laws as we know and the things we see on all of the materials we would see if we actually landed to the Moon.
So for example – if I see that the Flag is not moving during and short after it was put into the ground for me that will be extremely suspicious. If the shadows were all in parallel – again it will be pretty strange cause when I go outside I don’t see the object’s shadows to be parallel unless they have straight shape, their in parallel in vertical dimension and the surface where shadows project is smooth. It would be pretty strange if I didn’t see the astronauts in the shadow of the Moon’s module cause this will be in contrast with what I see Every Day With My Own Eyes. If I saw the stars during the Moon’s day time I will know that this pictures are fake.
But this is the reality – the way it was presented to us. So either Moon landing happened or it was simulated as it is till the latest detail.
So if anyone ask about the gravity, the Van Allen’s belt and bla bla – read the rest of the comments and the next pages. Also strongly recommended is Wikipedia. You can independently learn about the nature of the events from pages not related to the Moon landing at all – it is called science and it’s the same for everything no matter what kind of topics we discuss. Which lead us to the final conclusion – the beauty of the truth is that it’s perfect and is only one – it doesn’t depend of the people believes, doubts, ignorance or wishes unlike the lies which are infinite and everyone can make them by its own with no limitation. Also two people independently can test and prove that 1+1=2 while other two can sit down and listen 100000 other people telling them that 1+1=4 8 1212 or whatever. I’ve tested the theory myself but did you? Or you just believe in whatever you want to believe because you’re stupid and lazy?
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof
It’s almost impossible that the Apollo 11 landing was a hoax. Obiviously if it was filmed in a studio this large, we would either see it or they would have to film out in the desert which would render the reported “C” on a rock unnecessary, for that matter, why would they even need to mark a rock. The reason that no stars are showing is because, as said, there is no atmosphere on the moon and extensive amount of stars showing would cloud the picture. The flag looks like its moving because, also as said, there is little gravity on the moon, so something in motion would stay as such. They have also compared moon samples to those found in Antarctica. In closing, if the first moon landings were convincing, why would NASA keep on landing on the moon when it wasn’t that big of a deal. People want conspiracies so that they think that there is hidden meaning in things and that they can control events.
blah blah blah its all BS i think that they did land on th moon and you are just all so lame to spend days looking at photos and making a website, and looking for things to critisize! i mean ? cant you guyes all take it that some one got to the moon b 4 you did? and why would neil armstrong become religionus for a big ass ‘hoax” he saw the universe and thought- there must be a god who made all this it cant have just happened?!
GET OVER YOURSELVES AN GET A LIFE!
for th apolo team – ur welcome!
karl aka katie have you READ this page and the associated pages?
I ask because the writer obviously beleives there was a moon landing and it WAS NOT a big hoax!
Those who landed on the moon, rocks!
I happen to be doing a report on the conspiracy theories and found out some interesting things that put these theories in check. First of all the flag is most likely moving because of solar ion winds. Try walking under a street light and look at how your shadow changes and maybe you’ll get the point! And yes it was possible to slice videos and remove frames from them until they found one that had a full picture of Neil Armstrong (Therefore it became a picture). So before any hoaxers try and go change history think VERY carefully about the people you’re tryin to diss and the point you’re tryin to make.
Myth busters pretty much ends the debate.
Notice how the flag moves when the astronauts are touching it. As soon as they let go, it slowly comes to a stop because there is no air resistance. Inertia and zero air resistance is the key to understanding.
Or you can read a book about inertia and zero air resistance.
I dnt reli no wot 2 believe
Im doin a project on if itz a hoax an i dnt no bt i have an other issue bout it bein a fraud…
The flag is waving wen they plant it n as Uu no dere is no atmosphere on da moon so there4 no wind
Youtube Myth Busters Moon Landing Hoax.