Another problem with the moon landing photos can be seen in the next two Apollo images below.
Several astronauts seem to be lit up, as if they were standing in a spot light, even though they are in a large shadow on the moon!

Many moon landing hoax debunking theories have been made to explain this. The most popular explanation is the Earth gives off its own light that highlights the astronauts. But if the Earth gave off that much light, then a shadow would appear behind each person, and there would be multiple shadows in every moon photo. The Earth does give off some light but not enough to hi-light.
Instead, this anomaly is due to the reflectiveness of the moon. The sun light hits the moons surface, and reflects onto the astronaut ‘hi-lighting’ him.

This also happens on Earth. When you wear a white top in the sunlight, – even if you have a cap that forms a shadow – your face will still be lit up by the reflective sun light, when it hits the reflective surface of your white t-shirt.
Conspiracy believers also think that many of the moon landing photos have been doctored. This is because the quality of the photos are constant with every picture. All of the photos are focused and every thing is in view.

This at the time was a remarkable feat, as the cameras were attached to the astronauts chests (see next image) so the astronauts couldn’t see where they were shooting on the moon or whether the picture was focused properly.
If this was true then it would be suspicious. But simple sifting through files shows the real story. NASA wouldn’t print a moon photo took by Buzz if he chopped off the top of Neil’s head. And it definitely wouldn’t appear on the cover of The New Scientist magazine.
At the time it was costly to develop photos, so NASA wouldn’t waste money on faulty photos. The same as you and I wouldn’t show all of the faulty photos, to our friends. But now vast libraries can be put online for free, so all of the faulty photos can be seen in all there glory.

See our Apollo Moon Landing Forum.
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Camera Problems
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Video Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?

78 responses to Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
I would love to think we landed on the moon, and feel it’s my patriotic duty, but…..there are some questionable anomolies.. the crater my biggest problem from an engineering point of view, 1/6 the gravity of the earth footprint impression but no crater impression whats the force from a man in a spacesuit?? 150-200Lbs/6 25-33Lbs of force
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1
1 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
Even if the dust settled strait back down there still would be a sign of disturbance of some kind due to compressive forces but due to dynamics the likelyhood that the dust would fall exactly from whence it were disturbed is highly unlikely, like it or not thats a tough one to explain away…
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
Actually, if there HAD been a crater, that would have proven something was indeed wrong with the moon landing. Just use a search engine for “moon hoax debunked” (or something along those lines) and you will find many good sites that can explain ALL the hoaxers’ anomalies. Just remember, in over forty years, NO accredited scientist has EVER rejected the scientific explainations of ANY of these anomalies. If the conspiracy’s that big…it’s too late. We’re already all slaves to the illuminati. And if so, I’ll just drink another beer, surf the net, go where ever I want to go (well mostly), when I want to go, just like any other day of my life and think, “these illuminati guys…they’re allright”.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1
0 (+1)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
Guys, my question is very simple and I hope it will help us understand the truth or the flaw in the facts…….
How do you direct your rocket to another rotating sub-planet, which rotates around your planet so fast that you can see it move around with your own eyes through the sky within one single night. Its like you are riding a unicorn on a marry-go-round and you plan to jump to another unicorn on another marry-go-round. You can visualize the fact by keeping the fact of the size of someone riding on a planet, instead of the unicorn. To which direction did the fly and how they calculated that they would land precisely on the moon?
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1
2 (-1)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
It’s called math and science. I highly recommend it.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
2
0 (+2)
I’m a pro photographer. I’ve met several astronauts including Neil Armstrong. You have to remember that the surface of the moon is very bright creating a fill light source. In face light is being bounced all around from several sources. I understand and respect your opinions about man going to the moon however we did go to the moon and I’m extremely proud of the men and woman that man this dream real.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0
0 (0)
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
Leave a reply to Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence