Apollo Moon Landing Hoax - Camera Problems
On all of the cameras used to take pictures of the moon landing there is a + in the middle of the lens to help with distance but on some of the pictures objects overlap the plus.
This suggests that the plus was added later.
But the answer for this is simple.
If you notice, all of the overlapping objects are bright and white. Because of this, the colour background bleeds into the thin cross, making the cross fade/disappear.
The two images below especially show that if the plus is on a bright colour photograph, then the plus disappears.
But there is still one problem with one of the Apollo moon photos, on the bottom left corner of a photographic, there is a moon rock with the letter c ‘engraved’ on it. What more, the letter c is commonly used on movie props.
But again! There is a answer. For a start, if NASA really did use the alphabet as coding for movie props, then NASA would be limited to only 26 props, which on a ’set’ as big as the moon landing would seriously limit a billion dollar funded project. What’s more, the photographic negatives, and the smaller prints of the same photo doesn’t show the letter C.
If you zoom into the C you can see a shadow on the top bit of the c. This suggests that the c wasn’t flat on the rock. You can also see, that the c is a different colour to the rock (a dark yellow).
This points to a bit of fiber or hair, which dropped onto the smaller image when it was being enlarged. (Special thanks to lunaanomiles.com).
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax - Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax - More Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax - Camera Problems
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax - Video Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax - Scientific Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax - Why Fake a Moon Landing?
Popularity: 44%
RSS feed for comments on this post
April 30, 2006at 3:51 pm
[...] Camera Problems [...]
May 2, 2007at 10:02 pm
I would like to say how you can’t see the stars in the background of the photos. The answer to this problem is simple. Ask any photographer, they will explain how you can not get a bright object (astronaut) and a a very dim object (stars) on the same piece of film.
September 3, 2007at 6:37 am
two fibres on two different rocks, on the same picture in the same formation of a c?
May 6, 2008at 4:06 pm
if its hair..then what is it doing on the rock wouldent the astronaut like u know..die if they took their helmet off
May 15, 2008at 7:35 pm
It’s not saying the hair’s on the rock.
It’s saying the hair must hav fallen on the negative when they were enlarging them because the ‘C’ is not present on the original negative.
June 9, 2008at 9:33 pm
There are simple answers related to the photography questions. Many photographers and cinematographers can tell you the answers. 9/11 Conspiracies also have simple answers that could just be answered with a simple answer from a photographer who knows his/her stuff.
Wikipedia even has a ‘Conspiracy-Argument’ section on the Moon Landing Hoax page.
June 12, 2008at 5:24 pm
I love the whole “C rock as a movie prop” argument. As a set designer for smaller budget films, I have never, nor ever seen anyone (feature or indy film) mark any prop that was to be placed on a set. No one does this and people that believe they do have never worked on a movie set before
July 10, 2008at 4:33 am
[...] Moon Landing Hoax - Photographic Evidence Apollo Moon Landing Hoax - More Photographic Evidence Apollo Moon Landing Hoax - Camera Problems Apollo Moon Landing Hoax - Video Evidence Apollo Moon Landing Hoax - Scientific Evidence Apollo [...]
July 12, 2008at 9:18 am
I have to say for a hair to form the letter c on a negative is highly improbable. especialy on a rock which it turns out is often used as props. That is a lame excuse.