Comments on: Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Camera Problems

By: shitstorm

shitstorm — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:38:13 +0000

For one thing, all cameras that have wire cross hairs in them are used for focusing techniques. Take a look at a door that has horse hair in it, which is what cross hairs consist of or probably consisted of in that day. Because of a structuring anomaly besides the fact that you have absolutely no solid proof what so ever, and the fact that you weren’t there, makes this argument completely irrelevant. Spend your time doing something else.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 1 0 (+1)

By: STMan

STMan — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:03:21 +0000

The “C” was not on the rock, it was only on a duplicate photo, but not the original. The “C” rock photo is AS16-107-17446 you can do a search of the original on NASA’s archive.

http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html

The same rock also is on photo AS16-107-17445, but the “C” never appeared on that photo, proving that it was a flaw or debris on the copy or duplicate negative of only photo AS16-107-17446.

As for the crosshairs, the camera had a glass plate with fine aluminum, crosshairs imbedded in the glass. When a very bright area over a crosshair was exposed, the bright light bled into the film, exposing the small area that was to be blocked by the crosshair, and therefore the crosshair disapeared. You can prove this by looking at all the photos where this happens. It never disappears behind any colored object, only white that is overexposed. End of conspiracy. Now in the words of William Shatner, “Move out of your parents basement, and get a life”.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 1 0 (+1)

By: Miss Science

Miss Science — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:06:13 +0000

it is impossible to have a “hair” on the moon as no one has EVER been to the moon before without having a helmet on as they would die from the chemicals up there…

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 3 (-3)

By: Professor

Professor — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:00:24 +0000

cripes…is this the best people can come up with? a letter C on a photo so it must be a hoax!!! give me a break….

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 1 0 (+1)

By: alur

alur — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:34:03 +0000

Good gosh. This is the first time I saw pictures with the cross-hair and the first time I heard of the “conspiracy” involving the cross-hair being in front of objects.

It’s obvious that the part of the cross-hair that is missing is always over a bright, white object. Simply put, the white overexposes the picture, obscurring the cross-hair.

Geezus, I like a good hoax as well as the next person, but this isn’t one. I’m going to use my valuable time shadowing Elvis because he’s much more fun than cross-hairs.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 1 0 (+1)

By: stevo

stevo — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 05:37:33 +0000

The letter “C” is actually a Moon Worm.

They are fairly common as they feed on the cheese (that the moon is made out of).

-Me

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 3 1 (+2)

By: Is Real

Is Real — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:20:43 +0000

LOL. Biggest problem is..

The foot print photo.

The foot print photo shows the moon having a very FINE dust particles and able to hold its shape w/o moisture..

But all of the pics of the landing sites shows a rougher sandy grain… LOL

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: R

Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:18:07 +0000

I have to say for a hair to form the letter c on a negative is highly improbable. especialy on a rock which it turns out is often used as props. That is a lame excuse.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: Dekkins

Dekkins — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:24:30 +0000

I love the whole “C rock as a movie prop” argument. As a set designer for smaller budget films, I have never, nor ever seen anyone (feature or indy film) mark any prop that was to be placed on a set. No one does this and people that believe they do have never worked on a movie set before

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 3 0 (+3)

By: Matt

Matt — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:33:28 +0000

There are simple answers related to the photography questions. Many photographers and cinematographers can tell you the answers. 9/11 Conspiracies also have simple answers that could just be answered with a simple answer from a photographer who knows his/her stuff.

Wikipedia even has a ‘Conspiracy-Argument’ section on the Moon Landing Hoax page.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)