On all of the Apollo cameras used to take pictures of the moon landing there is a + in the middle of the lens to help with distance but on some of the pictures objects overlap the plus.
This suggests that the plus was added later.
But the answer for this is simple.
If you notice, all of the overlapping objects are bright and white. Because of this, the colour background bleeds into the thin cross, making the cross fade/disappear.
The two images below especially show that if the plus is on a bright colour photograph, then the plus disappears.
But there is still one problem with one of the Apollo moon photos, on the bottom left corner of a photographic, there is a moon rock with the letter c ‘engraved’ on it. What more, the letter c is commonly used on movie props.
But again! There is a answer. For a start, if NASA really did use the alphabet as coding for movie props, then NASA would be limited to only 26 props, which on a ‘set’ as big as the moon landing would seriously limit a billion dollar funded project. What’s more, the photographic negatives, and the smaller prints of the same photo doesn’t show the letter C.
If you zoom into the C you can see a shadow on the top bit of the c. This suggests that the c wasn’t flat on the rock. You can also see, that the c is a different colour to the rock (a dark yellow).
This points to a bit of fiber or hair, which dropped onto the smaller image when it was being enlarged. (Special thanks to lunaanomiles.com).
See our Apollo Moon Landing Forum.
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Camera Problems
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Video Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?
WELL AGAIN, ON A PURELY PRACTICAL LEVEL, WHAT DID WE GAIN FROM THE ‘MOON LANDINGS?’, A FEW NEW MATERIALS, AND WHAT ELSE? IF WE HAD SPENT NASA’S TRILLIONS ON ADVANCING THE HUMAN RACE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN WORTH IT, PUT IT THIS WAY, IN 1969 WE SEND 6 MISSIONS TO THE MOON, ONLY 13, A STAGED EVENT TO GET MORE MONEY IS STAGED, PUBLIC INTEREST IS WANING, AND YET, SINCE THEN, UP TO 2012 WE HAVE NEVER GONE HIGHER THAN 400, YES 400 MILES AND LOST 14 ASTRONAUTS, BEFORE THAT WE WENT 230,000 MILES, SURELY THAT IS PROGRESS IN REVERSE, IF THE YANKS HAD REALLY GONE TO THE MOON IN ’69 DON’T YOU THINK US MERE PEASANTS WOULD NOW BE ENJOYING SPACE TRAVEL, ALBEIT AT A PRICE? YET ALL WE WAIT FOR IS PRIVATEER RICHARD BRANSON, COMPLETE AND UTTER BULLSHIT.
View Comment
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00618/mcam/0618MR0026010620401331E01_DXXX.jpg
Take a look at this photo ( 0618MR0026010620401331E01_DXXX.jpg ) of Mars and look an the second large stone up from bottom right corner going diagonally left. There is a letter ‘C’ EXACTLY similar to the one on the famous “Moon prop rock” shown above. Not a hair now eh? Explain that big boys.
It’s not a C, it’s an O.
And it *looks* like some kind of inclusion (a pebble embedded in a slightly softer matrix rock). It looks like the surrounding matrix has eroded a bit, leaving a small channel around the edge of the pebble.
Or it could be something completely different; n ot a geologist.
So are we saying that the Mars probes are all hoaxes too, now?
I am convinced hoax theorists are liberal just based on the stupid non common sense comments I am reading