Comments on: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories: Could Terrorists Hi-Jack a Plane?

By: BlahBlahBlah

BlahBlahBlah — Sat, 17 Dec 2011 05:46:09 +0000

obviously you know nothing about jet fuel. it burns at about 1700 degrees Fahrenheit that could easily disintegrate or destroy a lot of the jet. plus the fact it crashed could cause it to be smashed. also the plane crash in Pennsylvania didn’t disappear have you not seen pictures of the crash site there are jet parts everywhere. you’re a stupid ignorant idiot who is sucked up into what everyone else is talking about/or doing.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 2 (-2)

By: kiriel

kiriel — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:44:15 +0000

Okay, here’s a question:
If you were on a plane, and a voice came over the intercom saying “We’re gonna crash the play and kill you all!!”, would you
(A) Stay seated on a one-way ticket to death
or
(B) Fight like HELL to get to the cockpit to save you butt?

Personally, I think that it would be almost impossible to hi-jack a plane, even if the terrorists had guns and other weapons. Think about it; about 50 people versus 3 to 5 people with limited ammunition. Overcoming them would be so simple.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: Yurick Hunt

Yurick Hunt — Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:09:28 +0000

No video of a plane hitting the pentagon, no airliner debris and no damage consistent with an airliner crashing into it…….
Who is trying to rewrite history???
(Damn trolls!)

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: Yurick Hunt

Yurick Hunt — Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:01:28 +0000

Just another idiot troll trying to help perpetrate the official story which is total hogwash. Get a life, already!!

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 0 (0)

By: Viking

Viking — Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:32:02 +0000

thats ridiculous for you to think that the plane parts were not from a 757. The panels came from a 757 the wheel, the tire, the landing gear and the compressor from the engine they are all from a 757.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 1 (-1)

By: Daniel

Daniel — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:45:03 +0000

The people whom are the one whom made factious claims about events are those whom only witnessed from afar then stated your opinion as fact.
911truther’s made up historical fiction and attempted to rewrite history that does not support their fictional cover memories for the catastrophic event and they sold books and lectures that were works of elaborate fictional conspiracies
that kept your flock entertaining the delusions you seed.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 0 2 (-2)

By: Daniel

Daniel — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:41:10 +0000

Ye they fell straight down so what hit wtc 3 the Hilton? WTC south

So there goes the they fell straight down lie

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 1 1 (0)

By: Daniel

Daniel — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:38:43 +0000

Since 2004 911truth group have only exposed
> itself as an group of incompetent researchers whom are self proclaimed
> experts on subjects that they have not fully researched and have created
> fantasies using pseudoscience and guesswork without doing full research.
>
> I do not see them having adequate forensic background or Metallurgy background to interpret NIST, FEMA, or any of the samples from Fresh kills
or the incident sites let alone be able to actually read and interpret the
reports accurately.
>
Instead they give people a fantasy of Underwriters lab certifies structural steel and no planes fantasy and how there were no hijackers and other
fantastic fantasy conspiracy.
>
> Te main thing is they have wasted your time creating a false reality that targets those whom are suffering the effects of a catastrophic event and making money off of it.

Terrorism existed before 91101 and most outside the United States understand that.

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 1 2 (-1)

By: mburb

mburb — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 05:51:51 +0000

Is it possible for everyone that calls the “conspiracy theories” crazy, to not accept the opinions of others. They could very well call you crazy for literally speaking the government, trying to shelter us from the facts completely. I think its funny that no body mentioned that Larry Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center, took out an insurance claim of 7.1 billion dollars, just 6 weeks before 9/11,and the insurance claim included terrorists attacks. funny, huh?

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 7 0 (+7)

By: Romey

Romey — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:27:18 +0000

Your quote below…an “adventure day” plane is a lot different from a Boeing 757/767. You clearly know nothing about how difficult such a plane is to fly, let alone crash squarely into a building that barely exceeds the wingspan of the aircraft. You must think it’s like playing a video game with a joystick? Maybe you also think that because you can drive a Honda sedan, you’d have a chance of completing Indy 500, or that because you can pick up a tennis racquet, you might have a chance of beating Roger Federer.”

“I myself could right now purchase an adventure day out where I could fly a plane for 30-60 minutes (depending on where you buy the day out from.) Admittedly I would be with a trained pilot all of the time, but after three times in the air I probably would be able to fly the plane. Not safely enough to get a licence, but well enough to get from the airport to the World Trade Center!”

Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment: 3 0 (+3)