First to even determine if there is a 911 conspiracy, we must find what, if anything, is wrong with the official statement. This for ease of reading has been broken down into two segments/problems with official World Trade Center (WTC) story, and problems with official Pentagon story, which is on the next page.
WTC: Official Story Debunking
The first supposed problems with the official version of the events on September 11th comes before the planes even leave the airport. For the Arab terrorists to have carried out the attack, four of the 19 terrorists would have needed to be able to fly a two engine plane.
Yet none of the terrorists had a pilots licence, and one of the pilots Hani Hanjour, had gone for lessons, and had been deemed unsafe to fly even a one seat plane.
Marcel Bernard, the chief flight instructor at the airport, said the man named Hani Hanjour went into the air in a Cessna 172 with instructors from the airport three times beginning the second week of August and had hoped to rent a plane from the airport. … Instructors at the school told Bernard that after three times in the air, they still felt he was unable to fly solo … — The Prince George’s Journal (Maryland), 2001-09-18, as quoted in Operation 911: NO SUICIDE PILOTS
But there is a difference between being skilled enough to fly a plane professionally, and just being able to fly the thing in the right direction (no need to land etc…). A professional has to take into account airspace, landing, fueling up, airplane checks.
I myself could right now purchase an adventure day out where I could fly a plane for 30-60 minutes (depending on where you buy the day out from.) Admittedly I would be with a trained pilot all of the time, but after three times in the air I probably would be able to fly the plane. Not safely enough to get a licence, but well enough to get from the airport to the World Trade Center!
This is assuming that this was the only time the Arab terrorists had flown a plane.
——————–
But even if the entire 19 terrorists were crack pilots could they have realistically got hold of the planes in the first place on September 11th? The conspiracy theorists think not:
The official story expects us to believe that these alleged nineteen on-board hijackers (acting with military coordination and precision) overpowered the flight attendants (with nothing more than box cutters and shouted commands), forced their way into the cabin (were all eight official pilots absorbed in contemplation of the clouds?), overpowered the pilots (apparently none of them, some ex-military, could offer any resistance to hijackers armed only with box cutters), took command of the planes
This is not such an unbelievable story, since out of the list if people given there, only the eight pilots would have been of any real help in combating the terrorists. (Lets face it, flight attendants are not designed for hand to hand combat.) and even with Ex-military training, 8 Vs 19 is not a good number to have against you. Add to this good planning, and the weapon of surprise, there seems to be nothing wrong theoretically with this approach.
38 responses to 9/11 Conspiracy Theories: Could Terrorists Hi-Jack a Plane?
you are crazy and all of your conspiricies are fake.
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
5 
9 (-4)
The pentagon is round the government is keeping it from us
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
12 
2 (+10)
not without specialised knowledge’ probably gained from a rat within security services
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
5 (-5)
It is Simple to understand.
Some secret organization with help of the US government plans everything… They successfully executed their plan… and they will destory their country very very soon…
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
7 
2 (+5)
Since 2004 911truth group have only exposed
> itself as an group of incompetent researchers whom are self proclaimed
> experts on subjects that they have not fully researched and have created
> fantasies using pseudoscience and guesswork without doing full research.
>
> I do not see them having adequate forensic background or Metallurgy background to interpret NIST, FEMA, or any of the samples from Fresh kills
or the incident sites let alone be able to actually read and interpret the
reports accurately.
>
Instead they give people a fantasy of Underwriters lab certifies structural steel and no planes fantasy and how there were no hijackers and other
fantastic fantasy conspiracy.
>
> Te main thing is they have wasted your time creating a false reality that targets those whom are suffering the effects of a catastrophic event and making money off of it.
Terrorism existed before 91101 and most outside the United States understand that.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
1 
2 (-1)
9/11 Conspiracy Theories: Could Terrorists Hi-Jack a Plane?
100% true. the theories aren’t theories, but they are the truth ####!
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
5 
0 (+5)
The way I think about it the odds are against us. The goverment had already wanted to get involved with iraqs fight but they beeded a reason so I say they made one the one we call 9-11.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
2 
5 (-3)
if we wanted to go to war with iraq so bad, and were setting up this massive conspiracy to do so, then please explain to me why wouldn’t make the hijackers iraqis?????? who blew this assignment in this “conspiracy”? we made most of the hijackers saudi arabians for crying out loud, come on people think for yourselves, this is basic….
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
2 
5 (-3)
you guys are all crazy, stuff happens.
im pretty sure the government wasnt the cause of 911
it was the talibans that decided to attack us, so they found the weakest source,
which is our airports, not anything else
Hot Conspiracy Debate. What do you think?
7 
4 (+3)
The boarding manifest for flight 77 was released by
TWA officials. The FBI tried to stop it from being released.
It showed that not one of the hijackers boarded that flight.
Not a one. Not a single piece of wreckage from flight 77,
(a 757) was foung at the pentagon. Plane parts were found,
but none that would have come from a 757.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
6 
1 (+5)
thats ridiculous for you to think that the plane parts were not from a 757. The panels came from a 757 the wheel, the tire, the landing gear and the compressor from the engine they are all from a 757.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
0 
1 (-1)
To Tim.
People reading your statement might think it was true. It’s not. The airline (American Airlines not TWA who were bought out by AA years ago) released a list of the innocent victims, not a manifest- they excluded those who were suspected of being the hijackers. But still, years later , the same disinformation presented as fact.
The wreakage found in the Pentagon was from American Airlines flight 77 -- the people whose job is was to verify that, verified it. I presume your ‘information’ is taken from some internet site, which was taken from some other internet site, where some self appointed ‘investigator’ performed a fifth hand ‘investigation’ by looking at photographs , never setting foot in the Pentagon or physically handling or examining one piece of debris.And of course had decided in advance what the result would be.
To Katherine.
Surely the most important part of a ‘false flag’ operation is the false flag bit. There is not much point attacking yourself and then not planting the evidence that the people you want to attack were responsible for it. If 911 was a big elaborate ‘inside job’ surely planting the bit of evidence that Iraq was involved in it, either in the planning or financing or execution would be just child’s play. What does the 911 report say about Iraqi involvement? It basically concludes that were not involved. Did they just forget to plant the evidence? Seven years later did they still forget? -having invaded Iraq they still didn’t plant the evidence? Some false flag operation. They forgot the most important part of it.
To Immortal Technique.
A co-ordinated suicide hijacking by terrorists -- that is unbelievable, apparently.
A co-ordinated ‘suicide’ hijacking by the Government made to look like it was done by terrorists involving demolition teams ,false planes,faked plane crashs,missiles,etc. etc. and who knows how many people in the planning ,execution and cover-up afterwards -- for the rest of their lives- that is more believable.
Correction on the pilots -- they all trained in american flight schools and received thier FAA issued commercial pilots licences and then went on to train on commercial jet simulators.
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
7 
2 (+5)
9/11 Conspiracy Theories: Could Terrorists Hi-Jack a Plane?
i think all of you should stop having a go at what eachother is saying. Everyone is entitled to there own opinion.
This is a very sensitive topic and you need to remember the people that gave there lives trying to help the innocent people in those buildings.
What matters is that over two thousand people died that day! and i think that the families of the people lost should get to know once and for all why it happened whether it was the government or a terrorst group.
Yes, it is possible for a terrorist group to hi-jack a plane! You Don’t need to know how to fly it if your not planning on landing it. aslong as you can steer the thing!
But just because it is possible doesn’t mean it was a terrorist group.
Unfortunately 9/11 happened. and nothing anyone says or does can change it. I think everyone should stop looking for people to blame! You cant find what isnt there!
Like or Dislike this Conspiracy Comment:
4 
2 (+2)
9/11 Conspiracy Theories: Could Terrorists Hi-Jack a Plane?
Leave a reply to 9/11 Conspiracy Theories: Could Terrorists Hi-Jack a Plane?